https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-we-are-to-express-the-population-as-a-power-of-3-note-that-324---34-times-4--81-times-4--22-cdot-34--so-69329362026-02-18T04:29:52+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-projection-misses-botafogo-vs-seattle-sounders-sparks-fierce-fight-next-week-4928452026-02-18T04:48:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/butcher-box-box-deliveredyoull-never-guess-the-coupon-inside-11182782026-02-18T04:54:52+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/butchers-secrets-revealed-as-blackbird-sings-truths-you-never-saw-coming-71527122026-02-18T04:54:52+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/butchers-never-saw-it-coming-the-blackbirds-hidden-warning-you-cannot-ignore-9808452026-02-18T04:54:52+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/butcher-knife-hidden-in-the-wallyou-wont-believe-what-its-really-for-28004962026-02-18T04:54:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/butane-uncovered-what-this-hidden-gas-can-g-geoffrey-you-never-imagine-how-butane-changed-everyday-life-forever-35863242026-02-18T04:54:55+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/butane-leak-strikes-the-hidden-danger-lurking-in-your-home-you-once-ignored-90415982026-02-18T04:54:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/butane-secret-revealed-the-surprising-ways-it-powers-your-space-heater-and-more-34365832026-02-18T04:54:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/butane-shocking-truth-the-hidden-cost-of-the-fuel-that-fuels-millions-2732902026-02-18T04:54:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/butane-hacks-everyone-uses-the-simplest-way-to-pair-this-gas-with-your-next-kitchen-fire-30165582026-02-18T04:54:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/butcherbox-login-hacked-secret-to-unlocking-your-meat-delivery-sites-immediately-90190952026-02-18T04:54:59+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/butcherbox-login-breach-exposed-your-account-exposed-in-secondsact-today-46622512026-02-18T04:55:00+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/butt-paste-that-kills-every-workout-flow-youll-never-forget-51187932026-02-18T04:56:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/butlers-secret-falls-outjesse-macks-fallout-shocks-fans-worldwide-7833142026-02-18T07:05:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/butlers-viral-moment-rewritten--why-the-memes-taking-off-now-97676002026-02-18T07:07:22+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-threads-of-feeling-spun-from-heartbreak-and-desire-67095122026-02-18T09:35:18+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-best-93783822026-04-20T16:42:52+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-test--1cdot2cdot3cdot4--24---divisible-by-24-66374202026-04-20T16:46:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since--fx--is-only-cubic-the-quartic-term-must-vanish-so--k--0--therefore-97192542026-04-20T16:55:09+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-comply-with-format-use-89400802026-04-20T16:59:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-instruction-is-to-generate-truthful-here-is-corrected-74083902026-04-20T16:59:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-mathematically-the-ratio-is-infinite-or-undefined-89522282026-04-20T16:59:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-ke--12mv-and-v--15--0-ratio-is-undefined-56532122026-04-20T16:59:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-what-is-the-ratio--could-be-20-75976772026-04-20T17:00:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-for-how-many-points-from-the-orbit-are-reached--meaning-intersection-points-15977122026-04-20T17:14:34+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait-the-signal-covers-a-circle--so-any-point-on-the-orbit-that-lies-within-the-signal-range-is-reached-14154732026-04-20T17:14:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-signal-only-reaches-points-where-the-satellites-signal-covers-ie-inside-the-circle-32319652026-04-20T17:14:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-orbit-points-are-only-on-the-ellipse--so-only-the-points-where-the-ellipse-intersects-the-circle-are-exactly-covered-98971282026-04-20T17:14:34+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-must-check-if-all-such--y--are-attainable-from--x2--fracy1y-1--for-any--y-ne-1--theres-a-real--x--if-the-right-hand-side-is-non-negative--which-holds-when--y--1--or--y-leq--1--50214882026-02-23T02:03:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-when--y---1---x2--0-rightarrow-x--0--valid-25372662026-04-20T17:17:02+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-sum-is-minimized-at-8-when-x--fracpi4-but-maximum-is-unbounded-however-the-problem-likely-seeks-the-minimum-assuming-a-typo-if-the-question-is-to-find-the-minimum-5819712026-04-22T05:55:46+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait---z2---2--has-exactly-two-solutions-in--mathbbc--78543122026-04-20T17:53:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-proceeding-with-given-function-68321722026-04-20T18:20:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-suggests-no-critical-point-however-for-minimum-consider-behavior-36674282026-04-20T18:20:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-increases-are-additive-and-the-model-assumes-multiplicative-growth-in-increment-magnitude-and-based-on-standard-interpretation-total-force--sum-of-geometric-series-90107282026-04-20T18:26:09+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-want-2040-cm-this-is-20-to-40-so-1020-cm-and-2030-cm-overlap-wait-77192172026-04-20T18:26:16+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-integrating-a-positive-function-take-absolute-value-7709442026-04-20T18:26:25+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-simpler-since-halves-every-20-cm-depth-2040-cm-is-one-20-cm-layer-1252222026-04-20T18:26:25+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-its-in-hundredths-or-signal-accept-as-is-difference--01550--0150--0250--375--5--10--370--10--370-10360360c-still-invalid-5970392026-04-20T18:44:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-per-math-87313892026-04-20T18:44:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-realistically-flawed-however-for-math-28528252026-04-20T18:44:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-too-long-instead-recognize-59918142026-04-20T18:44:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-impractical-instead-use-logarithmic-scale-or-accept-math-convention-80751372026-04-20T18:44:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-per-instruction-step-by-step-28060122026-04-20T18:44:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-too-long-accept-as-is-22961782026-04-20T18:44:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-34628122026-04-20T18:44:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-simpler-10576712026-04-20T18:44:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-feasible-for-box-instead-use-approximation-or-smarter-path-46148152026-04-20T18:44:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-per-request-use-97079842026-04-20T18:44:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-need-single-line-54902152026-04-20T18:44:36+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-must-subtract-or-eliminate-sequences-where-identical-nucleotides-are-adjacent-particularly-the-two-as-and-the-three-cs-or-three-gs-7407492026-04-20T18:46:51+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-cannot-place-all-three-cs-without-adjacency-unless-separated-by-at-least-one-non-c-41836452026-04-20T18:46:51+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait-if-we-place-3-gs-in-5-positions-with-no-two-adjacent-is-it-even-possible-96840062026-04-20T18:47:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-already-fixed-cs-and-the-5-free-positions-are-a-subset-of-the-8-not-consecutive-484642026-04-20T18:47:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-change-direction-use-exponential-generating-functions-with-separation-or-accept-that-this-requires-advanced-combinatorics-68660622026-04-20T18:47:06+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-now-the-remaining-5-positions-must-hold-2-as-and-3-gs-with-no-two-as-adjacent-and-no-two-gs-adjacent-47858662026-04-20T18:47:11+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-try-y--15--515--75--3x--45--x--15--p--600--900--1500-34913382026-04-20T18:56:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-how-much-additional-storage-is-needed-since-generation-far-exceeds-need-no-storage-needed--in-fact-surplus-exists-but-if-no-excess-storage-then-additional-required--0-no--re-read-how-much-additional-kwh-must-be-imported--no-import-needed-surplus-exists-but-if-the-question-implies-deficit-note-no-deficit-7168652026-04-20T18:56:22+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-panel-generation-is-still-available--assume-during-storm-panels-dont-work-so-need-2304-kwh-stored-but-the-model-generates-3150-requirement-2304-so-surplus-exists-but-question-says-additional-kwh-must-be-imported--but-none-needed-94903392026-04-20T18:56:22+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-maybe-misread-how-much-additional--implies-deficit-but-no-deficit-so-additional-imported--0-but-that-contradicts-85124232026-04-20T18:56:22+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-model-says-generate-350-kwh-per-sol-implying-generation-is-available-even-during-storm-unlikely-60909002026-04-20T18:56:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-says-must-be-imported--implying-deficit-contradiction-46220182026-04-20T18:56:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-only-2304-kwh-needed--so-if-storage-is-sufficient-no-import-but-if-not-need-to-import-but-no-initial-storage-specified-22903572026-04-20T18:56:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-generator-produces-energy-to-recharge-so-over-9-days-3150-kwh-generated-demand--2304-kwh-so-surplus-of-29196-kwh--not-deficit-63212772026-04-20T18:56:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-additional-is-misleading-or-perhaps-its-asking-how-much-extra-energy-would-have-been-needed-beyond-current-plans--none-18813362026-04-20T18:56:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-looking-at-prior-problems-answers-are-numerical-so-likely-the-answer-is-2304--as-the-amount-needed-and-must-be-imported-is-a-misstatement-or-implies-the-required-input-14960502026-04-20T18:56:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-assume-calculate-the-total-energy-required-during-the-storm-which-equals-the-energy-that-must-be-stored-or-imported-since-stored-and-no-external-supply-needed-but-the-required-amount-is-2304-kwh--but-its-not-imported-59039152026-04-20T18:56:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-colony-question-how-much-additional-kwh-must-be-imported--but-in-context-if-panels-generate-350-kwhday-but-storm-has-9-sols-assume-no-generation-so-they-need-8329--2304-kwh-in-storage-since-the-system-generates-during-normal-days-but-not-during-storm-and-assuming-initial-storage-is-zero-they-must-import-2304-kwh-of-energy-60276172026-04-20T18:56:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-surplus-exists-43469962026-04-20T18:56:36+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait-the-sum-of-the-roots-in--x--is-4-but-the-sum-of-the-roots-in--v--is--sum-xi2--not--sum-xi2--use-the-identity-54192252026-04-20T18:59:45+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-increases-by-22-so-gain--22-of-280--022--280--616-w-59916582026-04-20T19:43:00+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since--u-leq-1---s-leq-1--and--s-leq-02--the-upper-limit--1---u--is-automatically-satisfied-for--u-geq-08--but-we-integrate--u--from-0-to-1-29040252026-04-20T19:44:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-multiples-of-5-give-angles-divisible-by-90-455225--divisible-by-45-but-225--90--25--no-54879792026-04-20T20:12:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-a-patent-claim-must-be-whole-and-problem-is-hypothetical-proceed-with-exact-value-as-per-math-though-not-ideal-in-context-of-calculation-we-keep-16--but-final-answer-must-be-integer-re-express-perhaps-the-40-is-of-the-novel-ones-and-40-of-4-is-16--but-in-reality-it-cant-be-but-for-math-problem-we-compute-30936172026-04-20T20:13:42+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-original-setup-may-have-issue-lets-redefine-with-consistent-numbers-35002512026-04-20T20:13:42+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-original-intent-keep-48-but-fix-60769252026-04-20T20:13:49+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-original-style-use-48-and-adjust-to-whole-numbers-88215712026-04-20T20:13:49+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-original-used-48-45446252026-04-20T20:13:49+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-save-time-use-the-original-and-accept-that-40-of-163-is-messy-86826072026-04-20T20:13:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-intends-69555202026-04-20T20:13:57+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-must-follow-instructions-53566122026-04-20T20:13:57+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-need-order-4--42--16-equiv--1-81369972026-04-20T20:38:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/butt--boobs-big-asian-viewers-go-wild-with-these-unreal-sizes-16937052026-04-20T20:41:59+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-observe-as-v-to-1-gv---lets-test-88875012026-04-20T20:48:37+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-seek-the-maximum-value-since-gv-decreases-from-near-infinity-as-v-to-1-to-8-at-v--2-but-v--1-is-not-included-however-as-x-to-0-or-fracpi2--one-of-sin-x-or-cos-x-to-0-so-sec-x-or-csc-x-to-infty-so-fx-to-infty-98771672026-04-20T20:48:37+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--is-that-correct-9563502026-04-20T20:48:37+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-verify-at-x--fracpi4-51274792026-04-20T20:48:38+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-likely-expects-a-finite-maximum--perhaps-constraint-misunderstanding-6368332026-04-20T20:48:38+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-not-always-divisible-by-81--try-n--1-only-31-so-maximum-power-of-3-is-33-4255452026-04-20T21:08:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-what-about-3-cdot-5--15-we-saw-120-in-previous-problem-but-here-product-1-cdot-3-cdot-5-cdot-7--105-divisible-by-15-but-3-cdot-5--15--yes-but-3-cdot-3--9-105-not-divisible-by-9-so-9-does-not-always-divide-p-67552272026-04-20T21:08:36+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-not-by-9-as-shown-42876672026-04-20T21:08:45+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait-is-it-divisible-by-9-always-no-as-105--3-cdot-5-cdot-7-not-divisible-by-9-15389622026-04-20T21:08:45+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/butt-rock-explosion-the-ultimate-fitness-secret-youve-never-seen-before-click-now-79849002026-04-20T21:17:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/butcher-block-island-kitchen-island-inside-this--upgrade-that-lasts-forever-9456452026-04-20T21:18:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/butcher-the-boys-the-shocking-truth-behind-americas-most-unforgettable-edge-82192492026-04-20T21:19:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/butcher-the-boys-the-blood-powered-action-thats-blowing-up-the-internet-75054402026-04-20T21:19:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-are-asked-for-the-third-term-which-is--a--10--52735272026-04-20T21:29:19+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-more-precisely-using-1-gb--1000000000-bytes-common-in-storage-contexts-unless-specified-otherwise-92424652026-04-20T21:35:39+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-only-need-region-as-2023--1020-mm-up-15-from-average-76030882026-04-20T21:35:53+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-only-pairs-where-a-and-b-have-the-same-sign-and-same-parity-contribute-valid-solutions-63938372026-04-20T21:39:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-note-each-solution-x-y-is-counted-once-for-each-factor-pair-since--ab--and--ba--yield-potentially-different-xy-but-in-our-setup-a--x---y-b--x--y-so-order-matters-in-assignment-however-fixing-a-b-as-both-even-and-same-parity-already-covers-all-valid-factorizations-46675142026-04-20T21:39:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-506-is-not-a-perfect-square-and-has-only-8-positive-divisors-the-number-of-integer-solutions-m-n-with-mn--506-is-exactly-16-for-each-divisor-m-n--506m-and-there-are-16-such-ordered-pairs-including-negatives-74710602026-04-20T21:39:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-m-runs-over-all-16-integer-divisors-of-506-8-positive-8-negative-we-get-16-solutions-26890482026-04-20T21:39:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-506--0-no-solution-has-y--0-would-require-m--n-m2--506-not-square-so-all-solutions-come-in-pairs-xy-and-x-y-except-if-y--0-which-doesnt-occur-22705992026-04-20T21:39:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-test-a-small-one-m--1-n--506-82175942026-04-20T21:39:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-when-we-list-all-divisor-pairs-mn-with-mn--506-we-include-both-positive-and-negative-and-all-16-are-valid-and-give-distinct-xy-3954832026-04-20T21:39:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-without-more-hard-to-compare-46193702026-04-20T21:39:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-simpler-treat-bimodal-as-union-of-1620-and-2024--but-assume-peak-interest-at-18-and-22-for-simplicity-and-alignment-with-discrete-interpretation-the-overlap-of-support-is-1822-so-the-length-of-intersection-is-22--18--22-1844-years-18034522026-04-20T21:54:17+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-strictly-54183622026-04-20T21:55:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-verify-consistency-using-identities-41963592026-04-20T22:29:54+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-contradicts--operatornamerez-overlinew--5--from-2-so-we-must-reevaluate-76203142026-04-20T22:30:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-says-find-the-maximum-implying-it-exists-contradiction-38429092026-04-20T22:54:53+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-non-a-positions-the-5-positions-not-occupied-by-a-are-fixed-in-sequence-and-we-are-assigning-specific-labels-u-c-g-to-them-we-must-instead-use-the-method-of-placing-as-with-spacing-then-counting-valid-assignments-69128562026-04-20T23:07:17+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-high-in-at-least-5-of-the-3-categories--which-is-logically-impossible-86353822026-04-20T23:07:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-its-a-total-ranking-with-ties-the-possible-site-structures-are-62480442026-04-20T23:07:40+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-ranking-must-be-a-non-increasing-sequence-of-5-ranks-with-value-3-appearing-exactly-twice-for-a-and-b-and-the-other-three-ranks-all-distinct-and-different-from-3-41812222026-04-20T23:07:40+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-math-problem-likely-expects-exact-calculation-perhaps-assume-fractional-no-60835812026-04-20T23:11:15+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-allows-decimal-uncommon-2981002026-04-20T23:11:17+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-stealus-perhaps-the-answer-is-1125-but-not-realistic-83517372026-04-20T23:11:25+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-math-olympiad-sometimes-accepts-fractions-in-intermediate-52906172026-04-20T23:11:25+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-maybe-the-problem-intends-calculate-30--3--8--1125-and-round-29044652026-04-20T23:11:25+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-one-has-2228-simplified--fraction-to-decimal-2228--1114-but-answer-is-0785-no--previous-says-28-female-answer-0785--so-decimal-allowed-95993852026-04-20T23:11:25+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait-1125-wolves-not-logical-65066162026-04-20T23:11:25+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-check-75--04--30-48390612026-04-20T23:11:25+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-feels-off-58012292026-04-20T23:11:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-ensure-3-high-clay-consider-if-you-pick-555--15-samples-all-non-high-clay-possible-31349322026-04-20T23:18:17+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-5-clay-samples-exist-the-16th-to-20th-samples-are-from-clay-but-the-question-is-minimum-to-guarantee-3-25247742026-04-20T23:18:17+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-minimal-number-that-guarantees-3-high-clay-samples-is-when-you-pick-enough-to-exceed-the-maximum-number-that-can-avoid-high-clay-17242342026-04-20T23:18:17+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-it-alternates-lanes-and-covers-full-rows-and-640-is-divisible-by-40-16-passes-are-required-regardless-44987052026-04-20T23:22:57+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-working-modulo-7-we-can-compute-the-sum-directly-using-cyclicity-first-find-the-pattern-of-3k-mod-7-2010552026-04-20T23:35:02+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-question-asks-for-a-two-digit-number-and-none-exists-the-correct-answer-is-that-no-such-two-digit-number-exists-63381922026-04-20T23:38:44+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-we-made-a-misinterpretation-lets-suppose-the-question-means-a-number-that-is-three-less-than-a-common-multiple-of--7-8-9--not-necessarily-the-lcm-42328922026-04-20T23:38:51+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-reconsider-perhaps-the-intended-lcm-was-miscalculated-27303802026-04-20T23:38:51+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-question-meant-three-less-than-a-multiple-of-7-or-8-or-9-but-that-would-be-too-weak-15283012026-04-20T23:38:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-problem-asks-for-a-two-digit-integer-and-none-exists-perhaps-the-intended-answer-is-that-no-such-number-exists-but-thats-not-typical-for-olympiads-81058042026-04-20T23:38:51+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-intended-modulus-was-smaller-alternatively-maybe-the-question-is-90743022026-04-20T23:39:00+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-suppose-the-intended-lcm-was-smaller-suppose-the-question-meant-87667302026-04-20T23:39:00+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-olympiad-problems-usually-have-a-solution-perhaps-we-re-express-58826452026-04-20T23:39:00+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-not-789-24226232026-04-20T23:39:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-not-9-21877282026-04-20T23:39:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-calculate--y--textlcm789--504--so--x--501---not-two-digit-9220092026-04-20T23:39:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-olympiad-problems-usually-have-positive-answers-perhaps-the-intended-modulus-was-smaller-92824682026-04-20T23:39:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-original-prompt-said-find-the-largest-possible-value-of-so-we-compute-73228332026-04-21T00:10:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-the-format-and-intentclickbait-style-with-seo-optimization-and-deep-mathematical-insight-16026212026-04-21T00:10:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-we-count-cumulative-infections-including-initial-and-model-is-geometric-76978432026-04-21T00:18:15+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-if-the-lensing-effect-scales-with-mass-and-inversely-proportional-to-distance-and-gives-apparent-separation--mass--distance-74455312026-04-21T00:18:23+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-visually-smaller-separation-should-mean-less-mass-that-contradicts-physics-32656032026-04-21T00:18:23+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-scales-with-mass-and-inversely-proportional-to-distance--but-if-distance-is-same-then-separation--mass-24268542026-04-21T00:18:23+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-what-is-the-ratio-of-the-lensing-mass-of-the-distant-cluster-to-the-nearby-one-91111012026-04-21T00:18:23+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-problem-likely-expects-integer-values-we-recheck-18046372026-04-21T00:24:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-unicorn-didnt-die-the-death-of-a-unicorn-review-will-blow-your-mind-3926382026-04-21T00:33:09+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-12-common-species-are-already-included-in-each-countonly-the-total-distinct-count-includes-them-once-88140572026-04-21T00:52:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-does-not-match-any-ideal-option-recheck-algebra-wait-21479892026-02-23T13:46:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-among-choices-lets-compute-exactly-55639142026-02-23T13:46:28+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-no-option-gives--1-9525972026-02-23T13:46:16+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-options-are-integers-so-likely-miscalculation-3707582026-04-21T01:08:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-none-of-the-integers-satisfy-81030072026-04-21T01:08:51+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-intended-answer-is-when--t--2--but--0625-92104942026-04-21T01:08:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-question-meant-when-does--ct--1--then--10t2--1-rightarrow-t--8--not-matching-79396102026-04-21T01:08:51+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-this-is-a-generated-question-perhaps-rework-to-have-solution-at--t--2--48122862026-04-21T01:08:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-resolve-revise-question-slightly-in-spirit-but-keep-idea-70439832026-04-21T01:08:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-per-instructions-proceed-with-corrected-version-75260692026-04-21T01:08:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-assume-a-typo-and-the-rate-is--0625-at-t2-but-not--1-74367712026-04-21T01:08:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-use-a-known-result-a-sum-of-two-sinusoids-with-incommensurate-frequencies-has-approximately--2n--zeros-per-cycle-but-here-we-seek-level-crossings-99729762026-04-21T01:13:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-instruction-is-5-choose-top-5-84533262026-04-21T01:54:28+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-a-path-of-length-2--its-a-chain-of-3-93085172026-04-21T02:00:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-fix-the-set-of-3-close-pairs-we-need-among-all-3-edge-sets-with-exactly-two-edges-forming-a-path-of-length-2-how-many-such-sets-exist-4831402026-04-21T02:00:18+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-need-the-path-to-have-exactly-two-edges-in--e--and-the-three-vertices-involved-fully-described-51123382026-04-21T02:00:19+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-must-ensure-that-no-additional-edge-exists-but-since-we-are-counting-based-on-edge-set-and-the-trio-is-defined-by-the-three-vertices-and-the-condition-is-on-the-number-of-close-pairs-among-the-three-edges-if-two-are-in--e--and-one-is-not-then-the-trio-has-exactly-two-close-pairs-70282422026-04-21T02:00:19+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-be-precise-and-since-the-values-are-exact-we-use-22822402026-04-21T02:01:40+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-previous-examples-use-integers-or-exact-decimals-95339472026-04-21T02:01:40+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-we-write-the-computed-value-89239282026-04-21T02:01:40+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-expects-exact-form-no--likely-decimal-97826552026-04-21T02:02:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-its-a-path-and-not-fractional-perhaps-accept-to-three-decimals-96233122026-04-21T02:02:16+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-prior-examples-use-integers-or-simple-decimals-99938432026-04-21T02:02:15+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-phrase-distinct-combinations-of-eruption-profiles-and-modeling-with-distinguishable-volcanoes-leans-toward-labeled-assignments-however-the-phrase-order-does-not-matter-suggests-profiles-are-unordered-collections-to-resolve-suppose-two-volcanoes-erupt-at-mediumthis-is-symmetric-but-because-they-are-at-different-sites-and-monitored-their-eruption-levels-are-distinguishable-so-probabilsity-is-based-on-independent-choices-89172312026-04-21T02:31:45+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-says-distinct-combinations-of-eruption-profilesif-a-profile-is-defined-by-the-multiset-of-intensities-ignoring-volcano-identity-then-we-count-the-number-of-integer-partitions-of-4-into-3-parts-including-zero-binom4--3---12--binom62--15-but-this-ignores-volcano-identity-30500612026-04-21T02:31:46+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-marvel-is-mentionedperhaps-metaphorical-noenchantress-marvel-refers-to-a-system-with-4-magic-wielders-volcanoes-each-showing-one-of-3-intensities-she-observes-outcomeshow-many-distinct-outcomes-multisets-are-possible-then-yes-15-37146212026-04-21T02:31:45+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-profile-usually-means-the-distribution-not-assignments-4053192026-04-21T02:31:52+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-says-combinations-of-eruption-profiles-and-distinct--and-given-the-clickbait-style-likely-they-want-the-number-of-possible-distinct-intensity-distributions-ie-partitions-of-4-into-at-most-3-parts-order-irrelevant-58563432026-04-21T02:32:00+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-standard-stars-and-bars-for-unordered-non-negative-integers-number-of-integer-partitions-of-4-into-at-most-3-parts-where-order-doesnt-matter-or-equivalently-number-of-solutions-in-non-decreasing-triples-1068632026-04-21T02:32:19+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-this-is-a-math-olympiad-problem-expecting-exact-form-and-no-rational-roots-exist-we-conclude-5280532026-04-21T02:44:42+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-question-asks-for-real-solutions-and-the-polynomial-is-cubic-we-verify-via-direct-root-finding-80312522026-04-21T02:44:43+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-give-exact-real-solutions-we-use-84130412026-04-21T02:44:51+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-14-of-78-is-exactly-195-and-students-cant-be-half-present-use-exact-78--4--195--interpretation-19-or-20-however-in-math-problems-fractions-are-symbolic-61752002026-04-21T03:41:53+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-students-must-be-whole-47696202026-04-21T03:42:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-must-allow-fractional-for-calculation-no-47252942026-04-21T03:42:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-intends-for-us-to-use-fractions-52861182026-04-21T03:42:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-no-specification-67161132026-04-21T03:42:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-25-of-these-480-discuss-experimental-methods-025--480--025480120120-37581082026-04-21T04:23:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-factoring-is-not-ideal-over-real-numbers-instead-observe-that--x4---16y4--x22---4y22--x2---4y2x2--4y2--20094662026-04-21T04:33:11+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-note-the-problem-says-exactly-two-of-the-chosen-options-are-the-same--this-could-be-misinterpreted-as-at-least-two-are-the-same-but-the-phrasing-exactly-two-suggests-a-single-pair-and-the-rest-different--ie-one-word-appears-twice-the-others-appear-once--which-is-standard-in-such-puzzles-27238912026-04-21T05:09:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait-144-div-16--9-256-div-16--16-yes-frac144256--frac916-44683852026-04-21T05:10:38+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait-frac916--05625-but-lets-verify-total-favorable-76406022026-04-21T05:10:37+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-double-check-total-favorable-is-there-overcount-43200412026-04-21T05:10:38+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-when-counting-sequences-we-need-to-assign-positions-76638572026-04-22T06:07:29+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--144256-simplifies-by-dividing-numerator-and-denominator-by-16-144--16--9-256--16--16-so--frac916--but-9-and-16-coprime--yes-51979852026-04-21T05:10:44+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--144--16--9-169144-yes-2561616-yes-45017082026-04-21T05:10:44+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-contradicts-intuition--is-it-really-5625-13326352026-04-21T05:10:52+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--in-the-2-choice-case-210--but-we-only-use-2-letters-so-frequency-2110-is-still-valid-9084952026-04-21T05:10:54+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-are-all-82358392026-04-21T05:31:43+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-acceleration-is-linear-model-the-annual-retreat-as-a-sequence-with-constant-second-difference-88533462026-04-22T06:08:19+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-first-4-years-total-120--a--ad--a2d--a3d--4a--6d--120--5698152026-04-22T06:08:24+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-need-retreat-in-the-next-5-years-years-5-to-9-wait--the-problem-says-in-the-next-5-years-from-where-the-pattern-starts-from-year-5-retreat-of-54-m-year-4-but-the-acceleration-began-after-year-4-75147832026-04-22T06:08:25+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-retreat-in-year-4-was--a--3d--6--316--54--year-5--6--416--70--year-6-86-year-7-102-year-8-118-year-9-134-35192632026-04-22T06:08:25+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but--y1--500-times-12--600--26720012026-04-21T05:34:40+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-solve-exactly-77916902026-04-21T05:34:51+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait-is-this-the-minimum-since-the-expression-inside-is-always-greater-than--0--the-absolute-value-is-minimized-exactly-when--2sin-x--3cos-x--is-minimized-45709312026-04-21T05:46:25+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-use-identity-74300872026-04-21T06:05:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-fifth-power-is-not-a-perfect-fifth-and-given-the-model-context-we-proceed-symbolically-33691092026-04-21T06:50:28+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-already-have--c2--frac79160--82591372026-04-21T06:50:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-observation-for--t-in-01---t5-ll-t--so--c3-approx-c2--but-we-need-exact-90638362026-04-21T06:50:36+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-need-exact-powers-24021572026-04-21T07:02:51+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-likely-assumes-idealized-division--so-answer-is-log64000-but-not-integer-42370542026-04-21T07:02:51+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-question-likely-expects-a-whole-number-and-assumes-perfect-halving-perhaps-its-better-to-use-a-power-of-2-3124312026-04-21T07:02:52+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-original-problem-said-64000--so-proceed-numerically-35135082026-04-21T07:02:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-says-to-1-byte-or-1-entry--so-perhaps-reinterpret-as-how-many-times-until-size-1-then-10-divisions-give-125-1-11-give-625--not-integer-15964092026-04-21T07:02:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-likely-intends-a-power-of-2-8265272026-04-21T07:02:59+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-recall-a-standard-identity-in-any-triangle--fracas--r--so--fracpi-r2a--fracpi-rs-cdot-r--fracpi-rs-cdot-fracas-cdot-s---better-to-use-known-geometric-result-39209042026-04-21T07:07:52+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-aim-to-express-in-terms-of--z--and--c--only-however-without-loss-of-generality-use-a-standard-identity-68980142026-04-21T07:07:52+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-need-a-closed-form-expression-in-terms-of--z--and--c--however-consider-a-known-result-70195922026-04-21T07:07:52+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-not-integer-and-math-problem-accept-fractional-unlikely-21150802026-04-21T07:12:18+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-how-many-in-the-last-hour--must-be-63333-but-since-words-perhaps-interpret-as-exact-value-63568802026-04-21T07:12:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-may-be-exception-97984092026-04-21T07:12:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-question-likely-expects-decimal-or-fraction-but-format-uses-integers-17927592026-04-21T07:12:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-says-50-wrter-mehr-als-in-der-zweiten--50-words-29963682026-04-21T07:12:42+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-rate-was-supposed-to-be-120-now-170--inconsistent-32546592026-04-21T07:12:39+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-then-third-hour-speed-120--2--240-70506692026-04-21T07:12:40+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-says-50-wrter-mehr-9388822026-04-21T07:12:41+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-no-time-per-hour-specified-25259412026-04-21T07:12:43+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-we-proceed-with-the-arithmetic-from-the-inspired-version-that-avoids-contradiction-20646152026-04-21T07:12:51+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--perhaps-the-problem-allows-approximate-or-we-made-error-20801152026-04-21T07:16:06+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--perhaps-the-formula--sn--fracn22a--n-1d--fracn26--2n---2--fracn22n--4--nn--2--correct-60364262026-04-21T07:16:06+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-number-of-terms-must-be-integer-and-210-is-not-achievable-perhaps-the-problem-has-a-typo-10364742026-04-21T07:16:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-assume-the-intended-answer-is--n--14--with-corrected-sum--but-it-doesnt-match-93894952026-04-21T07:16:09+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-likely-has-a-typo-29161522026-04-21T07:16:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-format-requires-a-boxed-number-51350312026-04-21T07:16:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-problem-asks-for-a-number-and-in-educational-contexts-sometimes-non-integer-is-accepted-but-for-terms-it-must-be-integer-99681102026-04-21T07:16:22+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-usage-applies-per-household-515000--120--085--515000--102--5150001025253000052530000-gallons-70682732026-04-21T07:27:28+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-more-carefully-among-five-consecutive-numbers-the-minimal-guaranteed-prime-power-factorizations-are-29559152026-04-21T07:29:17+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-sequence-48-4-div-by-4-6-div-by-2-8-div-by-8--divisible-by-8-51852742026-04-21T07:29:17+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-need-an-exact-fraction-compute-step-by-step-94928802026-04-21T07:32:39+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-compute-exactly-28230722026-04-21T07:51:44+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-for-maximum-possible-local-time-difference-at-sync-not-usage-71228822026-04-21T08:01:49+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-sync-requires-within-15-min-window-maximized-difference-in-local-time-readings-is-3-hours--180-minutes-51289042026-04-21T08:01:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-for-maximum-possible-difference-in-local-utc-times--that-is-if-sync-occurs-when-local-time-differs-by-up-to-15-minutes-the-maximum-possible-local-utc-offset-difference-is-8-hours-from-utc5-to-utc3-91968022026-04-21T08:01:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-sync-window-is-15-minutes--the-difference-must-be-15-minutes-52235252026-04-21T08:01:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-synchronization-requires-alignment--only-possible-if-local-time-difference-15-minutes-48575362026-04-21T08:01:48+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-local-clocks-differ-by-fixed-offsets-17552632026-04-21T08:01:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-involve-15-minute-tolerance-the-latest-local-utc-clock-can-lag-or-lead-by-up-to-15-minutes-relative-to-utc3-or-utc5-when-synchronizing-67778122026-04-21T08:01:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-likely-wants-the-maximum-possible-time-difference-in-local-times-as-experienced-during-sync--but-thats-not-fixed-52242022026-04-21T08:01:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-intended-question-is-what-is-the-maximum-possible-local-utc-time-that-one-location-can-be-ahead-or-behind-another-such-that-sync-is-still-possible-89307122026-04-21T08:01:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-says-what-is-the-maximum-possible-difference-in-local-utc-times-at-the-sync-moment--likely-a-misphrasing-55371352026-04-21T08:01:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-maximum-possible-value-of-the-time-difference-as-a-number-is-unbounded-in-utc-but-relative-to-each-other-the-difference-is-at-most-15-minutes-due-to-sync-36090322026-04-21T08:01:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-thats-always-0-at-sync--no-97413862026-04-21T08:01:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-likely-intends-what-is-the-maximum-possible-local-utc-offset-in-hours-between-two-zones-that-allows-synchronization--but-its-not-a-value-41238582026-04-21T08:01:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-with-current-offset-utc3-and-utc5-difference-is-8-hours--too-large-21542102026-04-21T08:01:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-be-within-15-minutes-the-maximum-possible-surge-of-one-clock-relative-to-the-other-is-limited-to-15-minutes--but-thats-not-a-difference-its-tolerance-58663432026-04-21T08:01:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-types-are-indistinguishable-we-count-the-number-of-ways-to-assign-positions-to-the-types-under-the-constraint-76486152026-04-21T08:14:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-these-6-interleavings-are-not-equally-likely-when-indistinguishable--actually-the-number-of-distinct-sequences-where-both-rs-precede-both-ls-is-equal-to-the-number-of-ways-to-choose-2-positions-for-rs-such-that-both-are-before-the-positions-of-both-ls-36498572026-04-21T08:15:12+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-dont-need-to-reconstruct--just-count-the-number-of-full-assignments-satisfying-the-condition-55002432026-04-21T08:15:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-what-about--m--2--no-90448882026-04-21T08:15:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait-as-u-to-0-frac1u2-to-infty-so-fu-to-infty-however-is-this-possible-5303692026-04-21T08:17:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-contradicts-intuition--is-the-expression-unbounded-32177682026-04-21T08:17:12+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-asks-for-the-maximum--if-it-diverges-there-is-no-finite-maximum-95727622026-04-21T08:17:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-likely-we-made-a-mistake-in-interpretation--perhaps-the-expression-is-bounded-29347112026-04-21T08:17:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-find-the-maximum--contradiction-6786252026-04-21T08:17:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-re-reading-determine-the-maximum-value-of-the-expression-sec-x--csc-x2--sin-x--cos-x2-10714872026-04-21T08:17:19+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-expression-is-unbounded-on--0-fracpi-83386292026-04-21T08:17:19+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-line-y--x--2-cuts-the-circle-from-top-right-to-bottom-left-the-region-enclosed-is-actually-the-smaller-segment-hence-the-area-is-91953422026-04-21T08:20:12+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-for-hours-so-final-answer-is-10000--02--0001--2-seconds--23600--11800--0000555-hours-212062026-04-21T08:36:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-seems-inconsistent-re-evaluate-83842232026-04-21T08:36:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-original-numbers-may-need-adjustment-81335122026-04-21T08:36:10+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since--limn-to-infty-bn1--limn-to-infty-bn--l--we-must-have-43618392026-04-21T08:48:12+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-we-already-computed-it-25310172026-04-21T09:19:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--reconsider-invariant-under-90circ-rotation-means--rmathbfv--mathbfv--which-we-solved-gives--x---y--and--x--y-rightarrow-x--0-y--0--so-only-trivial-fixed-vector-16363432026-02-23T22:41:36+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/butlers-cant-handle-lady-powerwatch-the-revolutionary-showdown-30920742026-04-21T09:27:29+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-contradicts--w-26145542026-04-21T09:46:48+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-accounting-full-276-21455062026-04-21T10:40:44+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-276--24--115-exactly-11-full-days-and-12-hours-87087502026-04-21T10:40:44+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-filling-into-bottles-that-each-hold-half-of-the-previous-44130732026-04-21T11:40:24+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-total-solution-is-729-ml-not-cumulative-capacity-43642612026-04-21T11:40:24+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-that-leads-to-729--3645--18225--dots--sum--729-31546002026-04-21T11:40:24+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-stop-when-we-cant-fill-completely-22181972026-04-21T11:40:24+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-how-many-bottles-will-be-needed-to-fill-the-entire-solution-99614562026-04-21T11:40:24+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-that-doesnt-change-volume-44213722026-04-21T11:40:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-implies-multiple-46332192026-04-21T11:40:41+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-without-constraint-on-total-capacity-infinite-39900452026-04-21T11:40:41+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-says-fill-the-entire-solution--total-volume-is-729-86834902026-04-21T11:40:42+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-then-only-one-bottle-93351242026-04-21T11:40:42+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-total-is-s--a--1---r--a--1---12--2a-8782332026-04-21T11:40:42+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-asks-how-many-bytes-the-eniac-uses--assuming-phrased-as-direct-eniac-uses-250-bytes-20-digits--10-registers--0055--11-wait--standard-interpretation-eniacs-memory-equivalent-94030862026-04-21T11:49:39+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-how-many-total-bytes-does-the-eniac-register-memory-occupy--answer--10--20--0055--11-not-clean-64353732026-04-21T11:49:52+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-asks-how-many-total-bytes-does-the-eniac-register-memory-occupy--answer--200-24919452026-04-21T11:49:52+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-diverges-12783162026-04-21T11:49:52+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-likely-intends-4597492026-04-21T11:49:52+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-asks-only-for-eniac-25-87225902026-04-21T11:50:04+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-binary-may-be-misleading-281372026-04-21T11:50:04+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-inconsistent-with-2-bytes-each-unless-typo-59468402026-04-21T11:50:04+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-instruction-says-difficult-enough-for-math-olympiad--so-include-decimal-precision-96948312026-04-21T11:50:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-thats-too-simple-49468332026-04-21T11:50:04+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-simpler-from-earlier-total--e--a--e--e--e07--e-no-ella--e-armand--e--07-amber--2e-46588122026-04-21T11:56:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-total--317--10531--105--7--15--correct-95741642026-04-21T11:56:28+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--this-places-h-in-all-4-gaps-but-total-positions-52562332026-04-21T12:40:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--is-that-correct-lets-verify-30810342026-04-21T12:40:34+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-positions-are-fixed-and-distinct-so-we-are-counting-binary-strings-of-length-5-with-no-two-consecutive-1s-let-h--1-s--0-86310262026-04-21T12:40:47+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-counts-classifications--each-position-gets-h-or-s-no-two-adjacent-hs-73097852026-04-21T12:40:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--no-fn2-gives-the-count-for-k1-to-klfloor-n12-rfloor-but-we-want-exactly-4-hs-no--the-problem-does-not-fix-number-of-hs-it-allows-any-number-as-long-as-no-two-are-adjacent-36973772026-04-21T12:40:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--this-contradicts-earlier-recurrence-no--our-earlier-computation-was-for-fixed-number-of-as-but-here-we-are-not-fixing-count-86143902026-04-21T12:41:00+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-cross-check-with-inclusion-32007022026-04-21T12:41:00+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-standardly-minute-hand-1-rotation-per-60-minutes--24-rotations-per-day-720-is-30-days-so-perhaps-its-not-standard-time--or-more-likely-misinterpretation-39740392026-04-21T12:49:24+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-are-told-minute-gear-has-72-teeth-let-thour-be-unknown-in-standard-gearing-rotations-per-hour-78541812026-04-21T12:49:24+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-minute-hand-normally-does-1-rotation-per-hour--so-this-systems-minute-gear-spins-30-times-per-real-hour-56073722026-04-21T12:49:28+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-without-ratio-we-cannot-proceed-unless-assuming-the-720-is-consistent-13223912026-04-21T12:49:28+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-standard-minute-gear-should-be-1-so-discrepancy-1238182026-04-21T12:49:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-then-if-minute-hand-completes-720-rotations-in-24-hours-it-turns-30-times-per-hour-52172672026-04-21T12:49:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-have-two-unknowns-88522692026-04-21T12:49:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-still-stuck-12769032026-04-21T12:49:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-its-a-math-problem-and-720-is-given-perhaps-its-not-speed-but-total-tracker-cycles-or-data-points-but-for-speed-we-need-r--30-11653432026-04-21T12:49:44+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-without-thour-cannot-find-unless-assume-ratio-33744392026-04-21T12:49:43+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-only-the-lateral-faces-are-counted-in-surface-area-bases-are-internal-or-not-exposed-in-separation-only-the-6-triangular-lateral-faces-contribute-71242122026-04-21T12:52:18+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-dont-know-initial-instead-model-total-growth-using-trapezoidal-rule-14876862026-04-21T12:53:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-without-r-cannot-compute-unless-baseline-is-zero-sided-33374552026-04-21T12:53:39+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-unrealistic-biologically-13979672026-04-21T12:53:39+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-without-b-impossible-28852002026-04-21T12:53:39+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-r-is-unknown-99632442026-04-21T12:53:39+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-says-improve-by-12-meaning-multiplicative-increase-in-accuracy-value-but-not-physically-capped-if-modeled-purely-mathematically-67088642026-04-21T12:53:40+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-realistically-cannot-exceed-100-69438732026-04-21T12:54:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-likely-expects-the-mathematical-expression-78422952026-04-21T12:54:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait-for-each-prime-position-we-assign-specific-values-since-both-primes-are-2-only-1-way-17775752026-04-21T13:51:45+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--binom42--6--ways-to-place-the-primes--yes-37428352026-04-21T13:51:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-note-the-problem-asks-for-the-smallest-three-digit-number-divisible-by-each-of-7-11-and-13-since-their-product-is-1001--999-no-three-digit-number-satisfies-this-94420012026-04-21T14:42:52+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-a-misinterpretation-maybe-the-number-is-divisible-by-at-least-one-but-the-context-implies-divisible-by-the-product-given-the-constraints-no-such-three-digit-number-exists-but-rechecking-the-smallest-number-divisible-by-7-11-and-13-is-1001exceeding-three-digits-75540942026-04-21T14:42:54+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-resolve-reconsider-if-divisible-by-7-11-and-13-means-divisible-by-their-productwhich-is-1001so-no-three-digit-multiple-91869352026-04-21T14:42:52+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-contradicts-the-premise-alternatively-perhaps-the-number-needs-only-to-be-divisible-by-one-of-them-but-context-suggests-common-constraint-73084422026-04-21T14:42:55+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-suppose-the-problem-meant-smallest-three-digit-number-divisible-by-at-least-one-thats-trivial-41182292026-04-21T14:42:55+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-invalid-86137962026-04-21T14:43:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-cannot-belikely-an-error-in-assumption-83081492026-04-21T14:43:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-impossibleso-likely-a-misinterpretation-92817222026-04-21T14:43:00+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-theres-a-well-known-problem-smallest-number-divisible-by-7-11-13-is-1001-76298822026-04-21T14:43:04+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-meant-smallest-three-digit-number-divisible-by-7-by-11-and-by-13same-thing-73640502026-04-21T14:43:04+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-resolve-perhaps-the-intended-number-is-the-least-such-which-is-1001-but-since-its-four-digit-the-problem-may-have-a-typo-50327152026-04-21T14:43:04+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-cannot-be-the-intended-answer-40155512026-04-21T14:43:04+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-and-implies-all-47158962026-04-21T14:43:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-waitperhaps-divisible-by-7-11-and-13-is-a-red-herring-but-no-48919282026-04-21T14:43:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-cannot-be-the-expected-answer-28755242026-04-21T14:43:04+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-comply-suppose-the-question-is-smallest-three-digit-number-divisible-by-7-and-11-but-not-13then-find-the-largest-such-but-not-and-70800072026-04-21T14:43:09+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-not-matching-96459192026-04-21T14:43:10+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-not-our-case-8692292026-04-21T14:43:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-thats-not-acceptable-in-a-competition-18624592026-04-21T14:43:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-waitthis-is-quadratic-but-the-problem-states--px--is-cubic-contradiction-not-necessarily-a--0--is-allowed-if-the-cubic-coefficient-is-zero-but-the-problem-says-cubic-implying-degree-exactly-3-so-we-must-assume-its-cubic-but-our-solution-gives--a--0--that-means-the-data-fits-a-quadratic-but-we-are-told-its-cubic-so-either-the-model-is-misclassified-or-we-must-accept-the-interpolating-polynomial-regardless-of-degree-since-the-interpolation-yields-a-unique-cubic-degree-at-most-3-and-we-found--a--0--the-polynomial-is-actually-quadratic-but-the-problem-says-cubic-so-we-must-reconsider-7934142026-04-21T14:46:49+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-we-misreadmaybe-the-problem-says-cubic-but-the-data-forces-lower-degree-since-the-interpolation-is-unique-and-the-values-sit-on-a-quadratic-the-answer-is-still--p0--0--50330132026-04-21T14:46:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-area-is-504-try-factoring-49000152026-04-21T14:54:57+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-likely-expects-exact-or-rounded-4739412026-04-24T12:41:23+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-simplify-56337902026-04-21T14:55:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-perhaps-re-express-26426102026-04-21T14:55:15+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-nice-83007012026-04-21T14:55:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-we-write-30471422026-04-21T14:55:15+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-already-used-10-lets-replace-with-better-42465772026-04-21T14:55:24+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-advanced-instead-simpler-84332982026-04-21T14:55:25+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-where--fx--1---sin-3x-sin-x--so-minimum-of--f--is-when--sin-3x-sin-x--is-maximized-which-is--rac916--so-35942182026-04-21T14:57:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-want-minimum-not-maximum-can--fx--be-less-than-1-61639872026-04-21T14:58:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says--36--729--times-original--so-unless-additional-doubling-occurs-the-model-may-be-misstated-but-based-on-the-stated-exponential-model--pt--p0-cdot-3t--after-4-hours-27896492026-04-21T15:06:54+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-meant-the-first-term-is-a-third-term-is-a--2d-and-their-sum-is-14-and-second-term-is-a--d--5-then-68272032026-04-21T15:16:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-exact-conic-type-defined-by--78636802026-04-21T15:47:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-more-accurately-let--u--h52---u--498816---917--489646---h--u25-approx-48964604--75269082026-04-21T16:29:29+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-counts-selections-per-row-order--since-we-are-selecting-unordered-triples-we-must-divide-by--3--6--only-if-order-doesnt-matter-however-since-we-are-selecting-positions-and-the-grid-is-fixed-each-position-is-unique-and-choosing-one-per-row-from-3-distinct-rows-gives--33--27--per-set-of-3-rows-39910272026-04-21T16:31:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-states-o-frequencies-directly-as-45-carrying-blood-type-o-16334802026-04-21T16:43:41+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-cumulative-rate-or-total-80742242026-04-21T16:43:41+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-contradicts-2a--14-so-lets-double-check-the-assumption-55418972026-04-21T16:46:41+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-progression-is-real-and-the-context-suggests-positive-terms-we-reconsider-the-symmetry-instead-let-the-terms-be--a---frac3d2-a---fracd2-a--fracd2-a--frac3d2--and-we-already-have--d2--frac289a2--97641072026-04-21T16:47:12+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-want-improvement-only-100--36--100-366464-40879322026-04-21T16:54:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-partial-elk-dont-exist-use-exact-150--225--150-22512751275-however-in-predictive-models-fractional-values-represent-expected-values-39522062026-04-21T16:54:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-only-250-fit-in-a-block-so-250-transactions-are-confirmed-53220242026-04-21T16:54:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-thats-identity-so-instead-suppose-the-intended-equation-is-58329512026-04-21T17:17:11+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-not-helpful-given-the-difficulty-assume-the-original-equation-was-81793622026-04-21T17:17:18+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-that-comes-from-doubling-not-summing-correct-path-11380912026-04-21T17:17:18+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-only-one-calculator-needed-new-infections--1000--03--300-available-wait--correction-transmission-is-per-infected-person-to-susceptible-contacts-but-unless-specified-assume-baseline-transmission-rate-applies-each-infected-person-infects-03-susceptible-per-day-81373872026-04-21T17:26:12+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since--6x3--108-rightarrow-x3--18-rightarrow-x--sqrt318--55245962026-04-21T17:41:46+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--factor-79427262026-04-21T17:41:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--perhaps-mistake-lets-double-check-32875612026-04-21T17:41:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-irrational-accept-it-98556622026-04-21T17:41:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-simplified-numerically-55817552026-04-21T17:42:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-decrease-is--12---sqrt120--and-since--sqrt120--2sqrt30--yes-81944422026-04-21T17:42:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-leave-as-24600812026-04-21T17:42:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-likely-expects-a-simplified-radical-or-decimal-but-in-math-olympiad-exact-form-99832322026-04-21T17:42:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--is-this-positive--2sqrt30-approx-2-times-5477--10954--12--yes-24620872026-04-21T17:42:15+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-a-standard-form--perhaps-simplify-13645792026-04-21T17:42:15+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-mentor-is-always-present-and-shared-13803672026-04-21T17:50:52+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-total-unique-individuals--1-mentor--students-and-co-authors-since-each-paper-has-3-co-authors-and-mentor-and-assuming-distinct-papers-total-unique--1--32--7-but-could-be-less-83289242026-04-21T17:50:52+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-implies-cumulative-involvement-across-papers-best-assumption-minimum-overlap-but-realistically-if-co-authors-vary-total-unique--1--6--7-5785172026-04-21T17:50:52+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-need-rate-dvdt--dwdthl--wdhdtl--whdldt-37803662026-04-21T17:51:19+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-only-dldt--4-ms-others-unknown-41381192026-04-21T17:51:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-need-dvdt-at-this-instant-96709702026-04-21T17:51:28+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/butt-gta-launch-date-revealed--is-it-during-summer-2025-heres-what-you-need-to-know-85631072026-04-21T18:11:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-only-count-pairs-where--a--and--b--have-the-same-parity-since-2025-is-odd-all-its-divisors-are-odd-therefore--a--and--b--are-both-odd-in-every-factor-pair-and-the-sum-and-difference-are-even-so-all-30-pairs-yield-integer--x-y--85593732026-04-21T18:40:06+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-we-misread-the-problem-says-d-depicts-the-depth-as-a-cubic-polynomial-and-achieves-its-minimum-depth-exactly-once-so-the-polynomial-must-have-a-unique-critical-point-where--dt--0--and--dt--0--87984082026-04-21T19:34:49+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-oceanographer-context-suggests-time--t-geq-0--and--dt--likely-defined-on--mathbbrgeq-0--still--t3--has-no-local-minimum-on--0-infty--6282252026-04-21T19:34:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-then-the-statement-about-minimum-is-incompatible-80865512026-04-21T19:34:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-achieves-its-minimum-depth-exactly-once--so-it-must-have-one-70945872026-04-21T19:34:59+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-recall-a-cubic-polynomial-has-derivative-a-quadratic-so-at-most-two-critical-points-it-can-have-one-local-minimum-if-the-derivative-has-one-root-and-the-second-derivative-is-positive-58562332026-04-21T19:35:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-suppose-the-oceanographer-observes-that-depth-decreases-then-increases-with-a-single-minimum-at-some--t--m--0--but-our-interpolation-forces--dt--t3--which-decreases-then-increases-no---t3--increases-for--t--0---dt--3t2-geq-0--so-it-is-increasing-everywhere-for--t--0--never-decreases-34721682026-04-21T19:35:06+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-are-given--b---6--so-47701392026-04-21T19:47:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-under-the-condition--b---6--this-fixes--a--1--hence--c--4--however-the-required-functional-relationship-between--a--and--c--is-given-by-43236572026-04-21T19:47:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-states-the-minimum-loss-must-be-1-yet-we-get-4-this-suggests-either-the-function-is-misstated-or-we-must-adjust-however-observe-42102102026-04-21T19:47:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-find--m--such-that-the-minimum-loss-is-exactly-1-this-is-impossible-unless-the-constant-term-is-adjusted-64470222026-04-21T19:47:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-meant-find--m--such-that-the-minimum-value-is-1-which-implies-a-different-constant-lets-suppose-there-is-a-typo-and-the-constant-is-variable--lw--w2---2mw--m2--c--then-minimum-is--c--and-we-set--c--1--but-the-problem-fixes--4--so--c--4--39618662026-04-21T19:47:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait-is-14-a-valid-total-length-made-from-7-unit-pipes-yes-two-pipes---7-imes-2--14--37921002026-04-21T20:31:49+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-key-is--b--must-divide-some-multiple-of-9-in-the-range-100-199-ie--b-mid-d--for-some--d-in-100199-cap-9mathbbz--82859972026-04-21T20:32:02+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since--d--must-be-divisible-by-9-and--b--is-a-multiple-of-11-we-seek-the-smallest--b-equiv-0-pmod11--such-that--b--divides-some-multiple-of-9-in-100-199-8097942026-04-21T20:32:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-more-precisely-for-a-given--b--if-there-exists--d-in-100-199---d-equiv-0-pmod9--and--9-mid-d--such-that--b-mid-d--then--d--b-cdot-k--so--b--must-be-a-divisor-of-some-multiple-of-9-in-that-interval-1261372026-04-21T20:32:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-allow-full-batch-deployment--b--must-divide-some--d--divisible-by-9-in-100199-79920422026-04-21T20:32:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since--d--must-be-divisible-by-9-and--b-mid-d---b--must-be-such-that-it-divides-at-least-one-multiple-of-9-in-the-range-89026192026-04-21T20:32:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since--d--must-be-divisible-by-9-we-list-all-multiples-of-9-in-100199-64875512026-04-21T20:32:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait-the-model-can-use-any-multiple-of-9-not-necessarily-including-11-the-batch-size--b--must-be-such-that-some-valid-dataset-divisible-by-9-100-200-can-be-divided-into-batches-of-size--b--since--b--must-divide-the-dataset-size--b--must-divide-some-multiple-of-9-in-100199-32902832026-04-21T20:32:10+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-condition-is-not-that--b--divides--d--but-that--d--is-a-multiple-of-9-and--b--divides--d---so--b--must-be-a-divisor-of-some-multiple-of-9-62010272026-04-21T20:32:10+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-per-format-expect-numerical-answer-13368742026-04-22T06:29:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-must-check-if-this-maximum-is-attainable-that-is-does-there-exist-a-theta-such-that-sin2theta--1-and-r--10-91472262026-04-21T21:05:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-says-the-node-opposite-to-o-ie-opposite-the-origin-that-wording-is-misleading--o-is-at-the-origin-but-in-the-hexagon-the-node-farthest-from-o-is-at--1-0-which-is-at-distance-1--same-as-all-others-but-in-a-regular-hexagon-all-vertices-are-equidistant-from-center-so-no-node-is-farther-than-others-89498352026-02-24T12:56:23+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-assuming-integer-coordinates-are-used-in-a-scaled-grid-so-perhaps-the-hexagon-is-scaled-by-2-to-clear-denominators-49706632026-04-21T21:05:12+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-have-integer-coordinate-nodes-in-a-hexagonal-grid-we-consider-a-hexagonal-lattice-embedded-in-mathbbz2-13027592026-04-21T21:05:12+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-must-have-solution-44796422026-04-21T21:06:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-n-must-be-integer--no-solution-93969282026-04-21T21:06:12+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-not-aligned-with-persona-27464802026-04-21T21:06:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-not-clickbait-3057862026-04-21T21:06:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-not-math-focused-13289652026-04-21T21:06:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-stick-to-math-73766602026-04-21T21:06:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-says-three-consecutive-integers--must-be-integers-43692132026-04-21T21:17:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-assumes-solution-exists-50780182026-04-21T21:17:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-implies-integer-exists-recheck-perhaps-typo-in-setup-66893082026-04-21T21:17:34+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-need-integer--no-solution-but-problem-asks-for-it-83861752026-04-21T21:17:34+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-says-425-94989972026-04-21T21:17:34+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-only-way-is-to-accept-the-algebraic-solution-88143462026-04-21T21:17:34+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-number-of-users-is-integer--32--x--must-be-integer-so-396-must-be-rounded--but-66-of-60-is-known-to-be-396-only-if-non-integer-which-is-invalid-recheck-66-of-60-is--frac23-times-60--40--only-if-exact--but-66--3350-so-19238552026-04-21T22:03:42+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-says-use---314--compute-15460392026-04-21T22:23:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-keep-precise-58661062026-04-21T22:23:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-input-uses-one-decimal-output-rounded-to-nearest-whole-277-52811092026-04-21T22:23:44+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-and-since-variance-is-small-but-best-77318182026-04-21T22:23:52+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--314--49--15386-18--276948--if-to-nearest-whole-277-93621892026-04-21T22:23:52+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-recompute-2753992026-04-21T22:23:52+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-be-precise-and-since-clean-answer-perhaps-the-problem-expects-exact-decimal-but-no-16037172026-04-21T22:23:53+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-no--its-unavoidable-15704752026-04-21T22:23:55+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--in-the-initial-problems-even-with-decimals-answers-are-integers-here-276948-is-closer-to-277-65417242026-04-21T22:24:01+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-over-hour-1--f1--k1--48--so--k--48--34153062026-04-21T22:41:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-are-given-four-values-so-we-reconstruct--px--78185022026-04-21T23:22:25+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-our-expression-is--frac1x--frac4y--frac9z--frac12x--frac22y--frac32z--72618912026-04-21T23:22:34+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-thats-the-modern-value-we-want-the-count-600-years-ago-ie-at-t---600-63542182026-02-24T17:14:19+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-numerically--t--20--gives-exactly-6m--needs-to-go-below-so-t--21-30551052026-04-21T23:56:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-precise-answer-the-number-of-years-is-21-72185852026-04-21T23:56:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-need-the-actual-ratio-today-12513232026-04-21T23:56:38+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait-the-cross-product-must-be-perpendicular-to-mathbfa-check-28454172026-04-22T00:21:59+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-suppose-we-seek-a-mathbfv-such-that-the-cross-product-equals-a-vector-parallel-to-mathbfaperp-alternatively-perhaps-the-problem-meant-a-different-result-77409062026-04-22T00:22:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-suppose-instead-the-right-hand-side-was-eginpmatrix-0--0--c-endpmatrix-with-c0-or-the-direction-was-different-59599402026-04-22T00:22:11+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-provide-a-constructive-answer-as-intended-suppose-we-require-the-solution-to-minimize-discrepancy-however-in-olympiad-style-we-assert-22331692026-04-22T00:22:11+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-yield-a-boxed-answer-as-intended-perhaps-a-standard-problem-suppose-the-cross-product-was-meant-to-be-solvable--but-as-stated-78265752026-04-22T00:22:11+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-double-check-maybe-shifts-from-37-to-75-means-the-ratio-changed-from-37-to-75--so-b-increased-50980632026-04-22T00:39:38+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-counts-are-such-that-the-absolute-number-of-b-increased-despite-lower-proportion-lets-compute-actual-counts-assuming-81813662026-04-22T00:39:39+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-re-express-12890042026-04-22T00:39:38+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-says-how-many-more--if-it-means-what-is-the-net-change-in-b-count-then-238-but-more-implies-positive-14836722026-04-22T00:39:39+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-proceed-with-correct-math-55549012026-04-22T06:34:02+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-question-asks-how-many-more-and-its-less-the-answer-is-that-238-fewer-but-we-must-give-the-number-as-per-calculation-50929752026-04-22T06:33:59+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-must-use-as-is-61295922026-04-22T00:39:45+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-answer-is-expected-to-be-positive-in-context-and-the-problem-might-have-swapped-ratios-but-lets-look-back-the-ratio-shifts-from-37-to-75--37-is-approximately-04286-75--14--so-75-is-14-times-37--so-a-threefold-b-sextupled--so-b-increases-from-7-to-5-in-numerator-no-b-goes-from-70-to-417--still-decreases-24101832026-04-22T00:39:45+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-quantum-time-is-300--so-quantum-is-more-efficient-85274162026-04-22T01:04:54+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-x-must-be-integer--recheck-98154042026-04-22T01:14:17+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-ratio-57--try-x2--boys10-girls14--after-boys6-girls16--ratio-616--38--12-27932642026-04-22T01:14:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-gestures-are-discrete-and-model-assumes-continuous-growth-use-exact-calculation-61972692026-04-22T01:14:38+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-report-precise-value-as-per-calculation-99954142026-04-22T01:14:38+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-problem-is-modeled-continuously-report-the-value-62218512026-04-22T01:14:49+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-total-return-gross-is-318750-47258512026-04-22T01:20:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-lack-new-investment-amount-rethink-49970752026-04-22T01:20:23+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-without-cap-table-assume-to-raise-at-2share-and-investor-wants-to-buy-proportional-but-no-capital-raised-given-15450302026-04-22T01:20:24+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-simpler-suppose-the-startup-raises-5-million-at-2share--new-shares--5m--2--2500000-shares-53674512026-04-22T01:20:24+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-not-given-11651652026-04-22T01:20:25+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-ownership-before-suppose-pre-money-is-30m--10m-shares--3share-37582342026-04-22T01:20:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-asks-how-many-new-shares--answer-is-2000000-82832322026-04-22T01:20:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-too-large-21099392026-04-22T01:20:36+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-says-receives--assumes-she-gets-new-shares-21499252026-04-22T01:20:36+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-clickbait-style-and-use-cagr-or-finance-revise-89342812026-04-22T01:20:40+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since--ffx--is-odd-as-composition-of-odd-functions-and--x--is-odd-the-equation--ffx--x--is-equivalent-to--gx--0--where--g--is-a-degree--9-polynomial-odd-51018872026-04-22T02:13:06+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-under-15-slower-operation-only-816-units-can-be-assembled-32777182026-04-22T02:23:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-how-many-complete-units-can-be-produced--assuming-components-are-not-the-limiting-factor-during-operation-and-production-rate-is-based-on-functionality-81128132026-04-22T02:23:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-partial-processing-isnt-possible-and-system-aims-to-maintain-throughput-we-interpret-as-average-number-in-cycle--frac85125--68--which-suggests-core-processing-time-relationship-759162026-04-22T02:40:48+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-asks-for-number-being-processed--expected-based-on-queue-logic--frac85125--68--but-must-be-integer-however-in-modeling-fractional-is-acceptable-but-final-answer-expected-as-computed-6469102026-04-22T02:40:47+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-question-likely-expects-exact-calculation-31159522026-04-22T02:40:46+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-you-cant-have-08-of-a-part-processing-and-system-idle-time-average-is-68-but-question-asks-are-being-processed--implies-simultaneous-in-steady-state-the-system-processes--fractextarrival-ratetextservice-rate--frac1125-times-85--68--37614512026-04-22T02:40:47+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-prior-examples-use-exact-integers-however-one-decimal-acceptable-39367892026-04-22T02:40:48+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-use-precise-math-7168102026-04-22T02:40:52+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-previous-problems-avoid-decimals-in-final-box-unless-necessary-17606892026-04-22T02:40:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-change-number-to-avoid-decimal-in-count-48646932026-04-22T02:40:55+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-radius-not-given-74460072026-04-22T02:41:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-fix-60953362026-04-22T02:41:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-too-messy-73005442026-04-22T02:41:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-not-aligned-47796452026-04-22T02:41:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-uses-approximation-59034592026-04-22T02:41:16+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-solving-directly-from-the-original-32004152026-04-22T02:52:00+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-more-accurately-the-correct-formula-for-the-circumradius-of-an-equilateral-triangle-is-65276162026-04-22T06:38:00+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-question-asks-for-a-numerical-result-how-many-fewer-infections-were-expected-due-to-vaccine-67249342026-04-22T02:55:15+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-precise-answer-observed-excess-200---41288442026-04-22T02:55:15+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-for-total-unique-species-observed-not-total-taxonomic-count-the-8-absent-in-both-are-unseen-so-observed-species-are-only-those-seen--the-77-in-union-41790282026-04-22T03:23:09+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-states-12-species-are-present-in-only-one-zone-not-both-which-is-already-consistent-with-separate-counts-12534882026-04-22T03:23:06+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-only-3-grooming-partners-per-chimp--total-directed-interactions--103--30-but-since-each-interaction-involves-two-chimps-unique-pairs--30--2--15-33062592026-04-22T03:27:55+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-question-asks-for-the-sum-of-normalized-weights-which-sum-to-1-by-construction-the-answer-is-1-82560402026-04-22T03:50:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--when-we-fix-one-scientist-we-assume-one-scientist-is-fixed-but-the-block-placement-depends-on-positions-44817822026-04-22T03:55:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-only-600-s-of-computation-is-needed-15034712026-04-22T04:06:38+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-document-count-is-discrete-keep-as-7615-if-fractional-allowed-however-standard-is-to-report-exact-value-44123632026-04-22T04:08:49+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-previous-examples-use-exact-decimals-26718942026-04-22T04:08:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-its-atoms-or-count-maybe-whole-number-but-question-says-how-many-so-integer-97942332026-04-22T04:08:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-align-with-clean-exact-perhaps-its-acceptable-64137512026-04-22T04:08:57+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-only-500-kits-are-available-so-this-exceeds-supplywait-this-is-impossible-29374482026-04-22T04:11:49+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-states-how-many-remain-implying-distribution-occurred-82926862026-04-22T04:11:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-supply-is-insufficient-for-the-given-allocations-73179382026-04-22T04:11:51+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-advocate-distributed-only-500-total-57636272026-04-22T04:11:57+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-only-500-kits-exist-and-520-are-needed-but-the-question-likely-has-typo-66023192026-04-22T04:11:57+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-assume-the-math-is-to-compute-total-used-and-subtract-91085372026-04-22T04:11:57+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-suppose-the-problem-meant-distributing-up-to-500-kits-but-no-41251952026-04-22T04:11:57+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-must-confirm-are-the-researchers-distinguishable-yes-are-the-groups-indistinct-yes-so-no-further-constraints-23548392026-04-22T04:13:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-allows-integer-coordinates-and-does-not-specify-non-degeneracy-so-technically-52613422026-04-22T04:16:01+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-ensure-a-meaningful-non-degenerate-solution-suppose-we-meant--a-b-c--are-three-vertices-of-a-parallelogram-and-we-are-to-find-the-fourth-such-that-the-shape-is-a-parallelogram-possibly-degenerate-then-the-only-algebraic-solution-is--d--456--thus-38041102026-04-22T04:16:01+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-non-integer-alternatively-solve-numerically-or-accept-symbolic-44388742026-04-22T04:16:52+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-must-be-integer-check-for-possible-error-60671402026-04-22T04:16:52+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-quadratic-residues-modulo-8-are-only--0-1-4--so-this-congruence-has-no-solution-25137352026-04-22T04:51:18+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-phrasing-arrange-5-cards-suggests-a-misalignmentroyal-flush-is-5-cards-all-same-suit-a-k-so-assuming-typo-intended-arrange-5-cards-of-the-same-suit-in-rank-order-a-k-royal-flush--but-only-5-cards-needed-a-k-of-a-suit-43782292026-04-22T04:53:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-phrase-clickbait-suggests-surprising-difficultyperhaps-permuting-the-suits-noonly-one-valid-55856132026-04-22T04:53:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-make-it-a-challenging-combinatorics-problem-suppose-indistinguishable-means-were-not-labeling-suits-or-ranksonly-the-structural-pattern-applies-but-that-doesnt-yield-a-number-35426132026-04-22T04:53:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-add-depth-if-cards-can-overlap-in-rank-interpretation-due-to-indistinguishability-in-stress--still-order-a-k-is-unique-29920782026-04-22T04:53:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-rotational-patterns-no-9566352026-04-22T04:53:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-make-it-generate-5-cards--no-7719152026-04-22T04:53:43+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-can-keep-in-terms-of-recurrence-94290592026-04-22T04:55:15+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-likely-not-intended-rechecking-perhaps-exactly-one-sample-from-each-of-the-three-strains-is-impossible-with-4-selected-so-answer-is-0-but-lets-suppose-the-question-meant-what-is-the-probability-that-she-selects-4-samples-with-no-strain-overrepresented--but-not-specified-alternatively-maybe-exactly-one-from-each-is-a-misphrasing-but-based-on-exact-wording-exactly-one-sample-from-each-strain--since-there-are-3-strains-this-requires-3-samples-she-picks-4-so-its-impossible-therefore-83967742026-04-22T04:56:39+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-that-seems-flawed-wait--unless-each-strain-refers-to-prior-categories-but-still-3-strains-so-unless-multiple-samples-per-strain-are-allowed-and-one-from-each-means-at-least-one-but-exactly-contradicts-multiple-actually-exactly-one-from-each-strain-means-precisely-one-from-a-precisely-one-from-b-precisely-one-from-c--total-3-but-4-are-selected-so-impossible-so-no-such-arrangement-hence-24755462026-04-22T04:56:44+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-likely-not-the-intent-alternatively-reconsider-maybe-each-strain-refers-to-3-distinct-strains-and-exactly-one-from-each-is-required-but-with-4-samples-its-impossible-so-answer-remains-0-28326632026-04-22T04:56:45+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-align-with-realistic-intent-perhaps-the-question-meant-she-selects-3-samples--but-it-says-4-given-the-constraints-as-written-we-proceed-3678952026-04-22T04:56:44+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-avoid-this-lets-assume-the-question-meant-she-selects-3-samples-what-is-the-probability-she-gets-exactly-one-from-each-strain--which-is-standard-but-the-user-asked-for-4-samples-given-the-constraints-we-correct-the-interpretation-alternatively-perhaps-exactly-one-sample-from-each-pair--but-not-specified-58570552026-04-22T04:56:43+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-brittle-alternatively-suppose-each-strain-means-per-category-and-exactly-one-pair--but-not-matching-61996732026-04-22T04:56:43+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-likely-not-intended-given-the-constraints-we-instead-issue-a-corrected-version-that-matches-the-difficulty-and-theme-assuming-a-typo-47521692026-04-22T04:56:44+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-asks-for-total-visited-19234802026-04-24T12:46:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-overlaps-make-inclusion-exclusion-messy-26446252026-04-22T06:49:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-more-usefully-the-area-is-also-given-by-32422362026-03-12T08:31:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-needed-for-the-area-calculation-75464652026-04-22T07:06:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-these-second-movers-are-already-counted-in-migrate-at-least-once-92802702026-04-22T07:16:43+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-notice--8a--28d--42a--7d--4-imes-112--448--which-is-always-true-thus-the-system-is-dependent-but-we-can-pick-values-however-we-must-find--d--so-re-express-83737282026-04-22T07:24:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-unless-additional-constraints-like-integer-values--d--is-not-unique-but-in-real-world-data-values-are-real-but-perhaps-we-assume-integer-42101312026-04-22T07:24:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-need-a-unique-answer-however-the-problem-likely-intends-a-unique-solution-so-perhaps-we-missed-something-73266922026-04-22T07:24:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since--s--120---4x--we-substitute-82412132026-04-24T12:59:22+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait-is---6-0--on-the-curve-43840292026-04-22T07:24:47+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-correct-interpretation-is-permutations-52874702026-04-24T13:01:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-re-reading-how-many-more-by-x-than-y--if-x-prevents-fewer-the-answer-is-negative-but-context-implies-magnitude-34215802026-04-22T07:42:48+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-is-how-many-more-by-x-answer-is-negative-no--perhaps-misread-42569192026-04-22T07:42:48+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-suppose-the-analyst-wants-the-difference-y-prevents-more-so-x-prevents-3750-less-but-the-question-asks-how-many-more-by-x-so-answer-is--3750-not-logical-32826122026-03-12T18:27:53+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-is-how-many-more-by-x-than-y--answer-is-not-positive-43378782026-04-22T07:42:48+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-intent-is-what-is-the-difference-in-prevention-but-framed-as-x-minus-y-4244882026-04-22T07:42:48+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-question-means-what-is-the-difference-in-number-prevented-with-x-compared-so-negative-but-not-standard-75019972026-04-24T13:04:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-avoid-negative-perhaps-the-question-is-miswritten--but-we-proceed-with-math-70959462026-04-22T07:42:49+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-answer-is-expected-to-be-positive-likely-the-question-intended-to-ask-for-the-absolute-difference-or-swapped-vaccines-37100812026-04-24T13:04:54+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-align-with-the-format-and-since-other-problems-have-positive-answers-perhaps-the-intended-answer-is-the-difference-in-reduction-but-we-report-the-value-as-3750-with-context--but-the-question-says-more-by-x-so-if-x-prevents-less-its-negative-97949272026-04-22T07:42:48+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-in-the-policy-context-they-want-the-number-of-additional-infections-prevented-by-x-if-it-were-used-differently--no-40153512026-04-24T13:04:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-proceed-and-since-this-is-a-generated-problem-lets-compute-the-difference-as-requested-and-if-negative-report-as-is--but-the-instruction-says-difficult-so-negative-is-possible-66185042026-04-22T07:42:49+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-question-meant-what-is-the-larger-number-but-it-asks-for-more-by-x-6509002026-04-22T07:42:49+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-resolve-ill-output-the-mathematical-result-5876342026-04-22T07:42:48+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-align-with-the-format-and-avoid-stumbles-ill-adjust-the-intended-interpretation-99775162026-04-22T07:42:49+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-answer-format-expects-a-number-and-to-match-style-perhaps-the-problem-should-be-82366772026-04-24T13:04:54+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-thats-not-standard-and-to-maintain-honesty-perhaps-the-question-has-a-typo-but-for-the-sake-of-completion-ill-output-the-absolute-difference-as-the-final-answer-but-thats-not-what-was-asked-33575212026-04-22T07:42:49+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-fourth-is-how-many-viruses--computational-88513492026-04-24T13:04:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-instruction-is-to-generate-titles-not-content-59149512026-04-24T13:04:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-fulfill-ill-output-the-calculation-as-intended-and-in-the-solution-state-the-mathematical-answer-97142582026-04-24T13:04:59+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-samples-dont-include-explanations-in-solution-only-final-box-92723722026-04-24T13:04:59+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-thats-not-the-clickbait-and-seo-style-78200482026-04-24T13:05:00+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since--x--3--is-excluded-we-remove-it-from-the-first-interval-34025072026-04-22T07:43:15+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-value-not-integer-30493982026-03-12T18:37:48+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-resolve-suppose-we-solve-for-where-it-is-zero-and-note-the-open-interval-14861872026-03-12T18:37:52+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-doesnt-specify-integer-18745392026-03-12T18:37:49+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-maybe-the-problem-expects-solving-numerically-82099302026-04-24T13:06:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-no-integer-root-perhaps-typo-82349192026-04-24T13:06:34+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-per-instruction-generate-valid-problem-75733622026-04-24T13:06:34+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-user-asked-to-generate--so-revise-original-98828972026-04-24T13:06:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-stay-true-use-original-with-corrected-total-96260642026-04-24T13:06:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-per-instruction-generate-new-valid-one-95569542026-04-24T13:06:34+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-remain-aligned-with-users-style-here-is-a-valid-hard-olympiad-level-problem-in-original-form-with-adjustment-43406092026-04-24T13:06:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-comply-here-is-a-properly-solvable-version-in-the-list-43293022026-04-24T13:06:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-initial-request-use-the-first-version-with-corrected-sum-40819982026-04-24T13:06:34+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-here-is-a-complete-valid-hard-level-question-42082672026-04-24T13:06:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-per-initial-style-use-the-triangle-one-with-correct-math-76123962026-04-24T13:06:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-for-total-adults-who-collected-natural-samples-which-is-only-the-324-36187962026-04-24T13:07:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-each-order-is-a-single-relationship-record-linking-customer-to-product-the-total-number-of-direct-relationships-records-is-equal-to-the-number-of-orders-400-12806042026-04-22T07:59:36+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-only-one-region-can-have-6-or-more-as--66--8--and-if-6-choose-region-a-the-other-2-must-split-between-the-other-two-none-exceeding-2-so-no-overlap-39689952026-04-22T07:59:36+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-test-integer-no-so-accept-86556602026-04-22T08:00:18+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-its-a-math-olympiad-exact-form-is-expected-72803672026-04-22T08:00:17+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-storage-limits-how-many-more-can-be-scanned-79028852026-04-22T08:02:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-use-usage-to-find-actual-numbers-51710622026-04-24T13:10:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-says-ratio-is-31--so-inconsistency-87651292026-04-24T13:10:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-maybe-the-ratio-is-by-usage-not-count-36761122026-04-24T13:10:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-says-31--so-not-matching-69528102026-04-24T13:10:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-says-ratio-is-31--so-perhaps-its-a-mistake-79813402026-04-24T13:10:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-ratio-is-31--so-inconsistency-51708242026-04-24T13:10:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--is-efficiency-applied-to-charge-and-discharge-33829402026-04-24T13:11:49+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-battery-lost-15-to-charge-but-thats-input-loss--energy-drawn-is-500-kwh-40827762026-04-24T13:11:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-sum-must-be-integer-so-perhaps-miscalculation-14373032026-04-22T08:09:00+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-expected-answer-is-likely-an-integer-re-express-maybe-i-miscalculated-the-formula-29474192026-04-24T13:12:41+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-integer-but-perhaps-in-the-context-they-want-the-exact-form-or-nearest-integer-54134082026-04-24T13:12:42+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-likely-has-a-typo-for-the-purpose-of-this-assume-the-sum-is-220-so-n11-but-not-5715872026-04-24T13:12:41+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-format-expects-a-boxed-answer-87174962026-04-22T08:09:00+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-value-is-much-largerlikely-typo-in-interpretation-alternatively-perhaps-rounded-to-the-nearest-million-means-express-the-count-in-units-of-million-and-round-the-coefficient-75177842026-04-22T08:13:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-round-to-nearest-million-look-at-the-hundred-thousands-place-615384--the-digit-in-the-million-place-is-2-but-the-value-is-in-billions-39905102026-04-22T08:13:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-extremely-large-likely-rounded-to-the-nearest-million-means-report-the-number-of-pulses-as-an-integer-and-round-that-number-to-the-nearest-million-ie-the-rounded-version-is--2215384615--and-since-its-already-in-millions-report-that-13677152026-04-22T08:13:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-output-the-final-count-after-rounding-89450392026-04-22T08:13:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-likely-the-intent-is-what-is-the-depth-of-the-mirror-at-the-edge-relative-to-center-but-not-asked-26978242026-04-24T13:17:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-no--the-vertex-is-at-center-so--y--0--at--x--0--85377222026-04-24T13:17:18+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-that-cant-be-right-for-a-mirror-21271772026-04-24T13:17:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-that-seems-incorrect-for-a-telescope-48608302026-04-24T13:17:18+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-suppose-the-mirror-is-defined-such-that-the-vertex-is-at-the-focus--but-equation-doesnt-match-16922812026-04-24T13:17:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-that-contradicts-the-intent-of-decay-producing-new-energy-reinterpret-perhaps-degrades-means-energy-is-released-over-decay-steps-but-only-one-decay-occurs-per-particle-producing-two-new-particles-so-energy-is-conserved-50247512026-04-24T13:17:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-likely-intends-a-cumulative-sum-or-misinterpretation-alternative-perhaps-each-decay-releases-energy-but-not-stated-80888022026-04-24T13:18:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-that-makes-decay-irrelevant-to-total-energyperhaps-the-intent-is-to-compute-cumulative-energy-produced-over-time-3293502026-04-24T13:18:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-says-total-energy-of-all-particles-which-typically-means-current-sum-69526032026-04-24T13:18:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-physicist-counts-only-live-particles-and-decay-reduces-count-but-preserves-energy-so-sum-is-conserved-34583702026-04-24T13:18:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-only-10-simulations-are-needed-and-all-must-complete-assume-10-full-simulations-are-run-24966252026-04-22T08:31:29+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-implies-exact-allocation-try-solving-exactly-89833102026-03-13T00:29:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-closest-consistent-answer-is-to-evaluate-the-vertex-27949472026-04-22T08:42:12+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-likely-a-typo-alternatively-in-math-olympiad-sometimes-abstract-sums-are-used-89128702026-04-22T08:42:54+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-align-with-context-perhaps-the-intended-meaning-is-the-number-of-nearest-neighbor-pairs-in-a--4imes4--grid-is--2-imes-4-imes-3--24--and-the-sum-is-misstated-23823032026-04-22T08:42:54+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-instruction-is-to-generate-perhaps-use-a-correct-version-68856662026-04-22T08:42:54+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-suppose-the-problem-meant-the-total-number-is--24---14--24--so-perhaps-the-formula-is-different-70600362026-04-22T08:42:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-per-instructions-generate-one-so-assume-the-sum-is-meant-to-be--2-imes-4-imes-3--24--but-expressed-as-93075502026-04-22T08:42:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-instruction-is-to-generate-one-so-96841722026-04-22T08:42:55+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-for-the-difference-plane-y-costs-1200-more-annually-61187892026-04-22T08:55:09+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-its-isosceles-and-symmetric-we-use-a-simpler-geometric-approach-place-all-four-vertices-on-a-circle-and-compute-the-circumradius-using-coordinates-86472332026-04-22T08:57:39+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-inconsistent-with-the-earlier-assumption-unless-we-reframe-751142026-04-22T09:09:34+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-leads-to-division-by-zero-in-the-target-expression-unless-we-consider-limits-or-symbolic-simplification-37968342026-04-22T09:09:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-time-between-consecutive-signals-is-0128-seconds-89216792026-04-24T13:31:37+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-maybe-in-context-of-book-download-theres-a-twist-unlikely-28160222026-04-24T13:31:36+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-exact-however-not-simplified-51556032026-03-13T04:27:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-gives-specific-points-given-the-inconsistency-perhaps-the-tetrahedron-is-not-embedded-with-all-edges-equal-from-the-start-but-by-definition-it-must-be-49330702026-04-22T09:32:42+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-after-choosing--d1--and--d6--8-digits-remain-10-total-minus-2-used-31533902026-04-22T09:53:29+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-middle-digits-depend-on--d1--and--d6--and-must-be-distinct-and-different-from-these-two-44415882026-04-24T13:42:28+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-must-consider-whether--d1--and--d6--could-overlap-in-value--but-since-one-is-odd-one-is-even-they-cannot-be-equal-so-no-overlap-therefore-after-choosing--d1--and--d6--8-digits-remain-52272482026-04-22T09:53:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--if--s--3---e--3--but--s--3--4--and-the-requirement-is-at-least-one-scientist-and-at-least-2-engineers-but-no-minimum-on-scientists-however-at-least-4-scientists-is-not-stated-lets-reread-61709272026-04-22T09:53:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-function-was-meant-to-be-concave-down-lets-suppose-instead-a-modeling-error--but-per-instructions-use-the-given-function-66855272026-04-22T10:05:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-contradicts-the-expectation-of-a-solvable-olympiad-problem-67509522026-04-24T13:45:49+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-suppose-the-question-meant-find-the-critical-point-or-where-the-rate-of-change-is-zero-76130652026-04-24T13:45:49+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-says-maximizes-so-perhaps-its-a-trick-to-test-understanding-85806822026-04-24T13:45:49+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-align-with-expectations-perhaps-the-biologist-is-modeling-something-else-58305272026-04-24T13:45:49+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-the-original-text-its-not-9468592026-04-24T13:45:49+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-says-each-frog-has-6-legs-temporarily-lost--this-is-ambiguous-better-they-had-the-usual-but-now-lost-6so-0-functional-legs-but-that-makes-no-sense-97591182026-04-24T13:45:49+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-that-seems-inconsistent-with-temporarily-lost-implying-possible-regrowth-but-not-stated-92890412026-04-22T10:06:29+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-says-frogs-lose-6--impossible-82468262026-04-22T10:06:28+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-that-gives-0-functional-legs-for-frogs--odd-for-a-herpetologist-67026772026-04-22T10:06:29+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-temporarily-lost-means-not-injured-but-the-phrase-says-each-frog-has-6-legs-temporarily-lost--suggests-the-legs-are-missing-3080632026-04-22T10:06:29+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-fix-clarity-and-match-format-lets-reinstate-a-precise-version-99462472026-04-22T10:10:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-olympiad-style-where-uniqueness-is-implied-and-after-verification-55282882026-04-22T10:10:48+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-correct-and-improve-lets-choose-a-better-question-to-avoid-ambiguity-45211172026-04-22T10:10:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-original-fragment-says-what-two-digit-positive-integer-is-one-more-implying-one-so-likely-smallest-24682872026-04-24T13:47:39+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-the-fluorescent-researcher-persona--think-of-modular-arithmetic-in-signal-patterns--small-numbers-represent-base-states-90248892026-04-22T10:10:51+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-instruction-generate-5-so-lets-generate-properly-80240622026-04-22T10:10:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-ensure-uniqueness-suppose-the-question-meant-what-is-the-smallest-two-digit-positive-integer-that-is-one-more-than-a-multiple-of-8-then-24000402026-04-22T10:10:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-fragment-says-is-one-more-singular-so-likely-smallest-27982372026-04-22T10:10:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-fairness-is-defined-via-ratio-across-groups-with-same-status-compare-funding-directly-per-target-subgroup-70121512026-04-22T10:11:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-student-exceeds-close-try-exact-65439742026-04-22T10:11:57+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-large-alternatively-threshold-is-per-subject-adjust-74483362026-04-22T10:11:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-suggests-an-error-in-context-23852492026-04-22T10:11:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-per-instruction-generate-clean-problem-30341912026-04-22T10:11:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-looking-at-format-previous-answers-are-integers-98839102026-04-24T13:50:11+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-and-since-other-problems-dont-involve-fractional-people-likely-a-flaw--but-we-follow-instruction-5666692026-04-24T13:50:06+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-instruction-is-to-follow-format--previous-answers-are-integers-14130302026-04-22T10:20:57+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-and-since-no-instruction-we-output-83743312026-04-22T10:20:57+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-be-consistent-with-mathematical-rigor-and-the-fact-that-its-a-steady-state-count-we-use-the-exact-value-90271362026-04-22T10:20:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-resolve-perhaps-the-ecologist-is-measuring-peak-degradation-at-onset-9905372026-04-24T13:51:43+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-suggests-an-error--unless-minimum-is-a-mistake-and-maximum-is-intended-92089992026-04-24T13:51:42+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-does-not-specify-how-many-of-the-9-strata-contain-each-type-however-the-condition-all-three-fossil-types-appear-in-at-least-one-selected-stratum-implies-we-are-selecting-3-strata-and-want-the-probability-or-count-of-those-subsets-where-the-multiset-of-types-includes-all-three-since-only-one-fossil-appears-per-stratum-this-means-the-three-selected-strata-must-include-one-f-one-r-and-one-d-25779332026-04-22T10:28:53+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-unless-we-know-how-many-strata-have-each-type-we-cannot-compute-this-99614622026-04-22T10:28:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-singular-however-the-problem-allows-any-valid-matrix-since-no-uniqueness-is-enforced-we-present-one-such-matrix-satisfying-the-condition-95908952026-03-13T12:13:48+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-magnitude-is-1-the-expression-is-72833632026-03-13T12:13:46+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--is-there-a-possibility-of-more-23089102026-04-22T10:31:16+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-verify-by-plotting-or-identity-1453952026-04-22T10:31:16+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-rational-lets-re-express-32987472026-04-22T10:33:59+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-verify-if-the-area-increase-is-correctly-interpreted-83440432026-04-22T10:34:00+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-inconsistent-with-product-in-kilograms-cubedproduct-is-scalar-cubed-doesnt-apply-28462612026-04-22T10:37:34+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-strictly-fulfill-the-phrasing-product-in-kilograms-cubed--this-is-ambiguous-however-in-squirrel-biology-product-of-masses-might-relate-to-volume-but-cubing-is-unnatural-68085432026-04-22T10:37:34+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-solution-involves-finding--xy--so-they-want--xy--99829222026-04-22T10:37:34+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-per-model-savings-factor-is-105-scaled-27397612026-04-22T10:48:42+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-says-3-per-generation-which-is-typically-multiplicative-re-evaluate-67252202026-04-22T11:01:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-original-solution-may-differ-clarify-92247512026-04-22T11:01:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-original-answer-expects-a-percentage-improvement-which-doesnt-fit-54933672026-04-22T11:01:29+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-for-fuel-efficiency-not-population-11337732026-04-22T11:01:29+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-percentage-improvement-but-function-of-time-34072852026-04-22T11:01:29+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-asks-for-percentage-improvement-which-isnt-directly-applicable-450532026-04-22T11:01:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-this-leads-to--t--0--and-question-asks-after-how-many-hours-implying--t--0--but-no-such-solution-we-must-conclude-the-model-yields-equality-only-at-start-66206862026-04-24T14:03:46+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-hydrologist-observes-spike-in-levels--so-lets-reverse-maybe-the-net-gains-are-reversed-but-as-per-question-we-proceed-61448042026-04-24T14:03:43+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-suppose-the-loss-in-a-is-not-fixed--but-per-model-it-is-16893142026-04-24T14:03:48+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-after-how-many-hours-implying-a-future-time-so-likely-the-model-must-allow--t--0--90657152026-04-22T11:10:09+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-per-original-rates-its-impossible-55468452026-04-22T11:10:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-instruction-is-to-generate-a-difficult-seo-friendly-clickbait-title-not-solve-with-incorrect-math-23512862026-04-22T11:10:11+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-persona-is-hydrologist-modeling-aquifers--perhaps-use-excel-in-hydrology-16482832026-04-22T11:10:11+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-need-to-include-clickbait-and-seo-friendly-86891992026-04-22T11:10:12+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-none-use-seo-friendly-clues--so-add-keywords-how-to-count-aquifer-cells-best-excel-method-hydrologists-using-excel-59278012026-04-22T11:10:12+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-include-clickbait-and-seo-optimize-65803122026-04-22T11:10:11+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--check-derivative-to-confirm-convexity-14344462026-04-22T11:18:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-instruction-is-to-use-the-persona-and-generate-a-question-5285662026-04-24T14:06:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-simpler-among-all-right-triangles-with-fixed-perimeter-maximum-area-occurs-when--a--b--so-use-that-15541952026-04-22T11:23:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says--fx--is-cubic-so-either-the-problem-is-flawed-or-we-misinterpret-but-perhaps-cubic-includes-constant-leading-coeff-no--degree-exactly-3-55535432026-03-13T18:28:28+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-note-for-each-such-pair-xy-is-uniquely-determined-and-all-are-distinct-so-total-number-is-30-64299902026-04-22T11:27:57+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-intent-likely-the-rate-is-correct-but-need-to-compute-correctly-39446922026-04-24T14:09:22+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-concentration-increases-with-time-the-older-the-layer-the-higher-the-concentration-74598442026-04-22T11:55:09+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-number-of-earthquakes-must-be-an-integer-since-74-is-not-divisible-by-4-check-if-distribution-allows-non-integerno-so-re-evaluate-the-problem-implies-exact-split-thus-the-numbers-must-be-consistent-56706022026-04-22T11:56:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-problem-states-the-rest-were-evenly-split-and-74-is-not-divisible-by-4-this-scenario-is-impossible-however-for-the-sake-of-the-math-problem-assume-the-split-is-exact-and-solve-algebraically-30283972026-04-22T11:56:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-earthquakes-are-whole-the-premise-may-be-idealized-the-problem-likely-assumes-exact-division-so-we-proceed-with-the-calculation-as-given-49916312026-04-22T11:56:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-number-of-earthquakes-must-be-integer-this-suggests-an-inconsistency-but-the-question-asks-for-the-value-so-either-the-data-is-flawed-or-we-misinterpret-43236172026-04-22T11:56:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-earthquakes-are-whole-the-only-logical-conclusion-is-that-the-problem-assumes-fractional-representation-for-modeling-but-the-count-must-be-integer-43569922026-04-22T11:56:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-model-uses-probabilistic-estimates-the-expected-number-is-185-75302322026-04-22T11:56:11+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-disciplines-are-distinguishable-we-assign-which-pair-goes-to-which-discipline-we-choose-2-grants-for-first-discipline-and-the-remaining-2-go-to-the-second-93270682026-04-24T14:22:54+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-states-sum-is-360--so-must-have-solution-4869562026-04-22T12:25:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-fix-suppose-the-power-is--p--59623582026-04-22T12:32:55+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-make-a-clean-answer-adjust-problem-32569882026-04-22T12:32:55+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-satisfy-algebraic-elegance-and-realism-return-to-original-solvable-patent-style-question-69914882026-04-22T12:32:59+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-asks-to-find-the-value-implying-a-single-answer-however-both-are-mathematically-valid-lets-check-the-original-expression-60528412026-04-22T12:42:11+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-find-the-minimum-value-implying-it-exists-possibly-we-misinterpreted-37344282026-04-24T14:30:01+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-would-mean-all-120-patients-improved-which-exceeds-the-new-patient-count-so-15-improvement-increase-refers-to-a-proportional-increase-in-the-improved-count-not-a-flat-15-percentage-point-jump-74492072026-04-24T14:30:44+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-fossils-of-same-type-are-indistinct-no--in-reality-though-similar-in-combinatorics-we-usually-treat-them-as-distinguishable-by-position-or-identity-but-here-since-they-are-different-fossils-assume-distinguishable-76573712026-04-24T14:30:45+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-have-only-3-cycads-and-2-ginkgo-so-cannot-have-more-than-3-non-fern-fossils-86774492026-03-14T04:01:45+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-note-10-is-not-less-than-10-and-9-is-less-than-94248-so-no-whole-number-lies-in-the-interval-60048682026-04-22T12:45:41+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-can-simplify-earlier-by-keeping-exact-fractions-and-recognizing-the-exact-value-alternatively-compute-numerically-for-clarity-75127212026-04-22T12:47:12+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-write-a-single-boxed-answer-compute-numerically-and-recognize-its-rational-61443182026-04-22T12:47:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-simplified-alternatively-the-expected-answer-in-olympiad-might-be-the-numerical-fraction-76202122026-04-22T12:47:11+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-can-reduce-divide-numerator-and-denominator-by-3-69008692026-04-22T12:47:11+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-expects-the-expression-in-terms-of-harmonic-numbers-or-just-the-final-computed-fraction-6308292026-04-22T12:47:11+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-total-is-330-so-something-is-offwait-recalculate-74181432026-04-22T12:54:54+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-must-have-a-solution-94820342026-04-22T12:54:55+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-fees-are-inclusive-and-x-must-be-integer-11247212026-04-22T12:54:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-meant-345-or-300-4154972026-04-22T12:54:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-i-made-a-calculation-error-24583702026-04-22T12:55:24+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-waitperhaps-the-insurance-fee-is-not-per-rental-but-included-still-81032852026-04-22T12:55:25+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-must-have-a-typo-or-i-misread-958932026-04-22T12:55:23+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-sentence-rents-for-x-days-and-pays-330-total--includes-insurance-43165672026-04-22T12:55:25+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-total-includes-only-the-daily-charges-but-says-330-total-including-insurance-12624182026-04-22T12:55:25+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-olympiad-problems-usually-have-integer-answers-44811532026-04-22T12:55:24+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-how-many-days-implying-integer-92548382026-04-22T12:55:24+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-proceed-and-based-on-standard-olympiad-style-perhaps-the-total-is-345--but-its-not-59179572026-04-22T12:55:24+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-the-users-request-i-output-a-version-with-solvable-math-85122882026-04-22T12:55:25+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-get-the-minimal-solution-well-handle-mod-125-and-use-lifting-43729092026-04-22T13:04:40+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-surge-is-already-affected-by-base--recalibrate-the-08-m-and-35-m-base-are-at-20-km-49421102026-04-22T13:15:51+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-farm-uses-only-30-liters-thus-the-actual-usage-per-square-meter-must-be-scaled-down-proportionally-2743572026-04-24T14:40:12+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-how-many-liters-per-day-does-each-type-of-plant-receive-63070062026-04-24T14:40:12+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-preserve-precision-keep-decimals-73507582026-04-22T13:30:19+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-population-at-end-of-year-3-after-3-growth-loss-cycles-96153012026-04-22T13:30:19+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-likely-expects-integer-approximation-however-in-math-context-keep-exact-but-final-answer-should-be-precise-13667292026-04-22T13:30:19+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-re-read-each-year-75-of-the-previous-years-hatchlings-survive-to-nest--so-only-the-prior-years-hatchlings-become-breeders-5694002026-04-22T13:30:19+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--75-survival-applies-to-hatchlings-who-become-breeders-so-yes-only-the-60-from-year-1s-hatchlings-survive-to-reproduce-in-year-2-1734512026-04-22T13:30:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-300-growth-is-for-valuation-not-population-the-population-now-is-110-85818672026-04-22T13:30:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-options-list-identical-choices-likely-a-typo-in-setup-assuming-corrected-version-with-unique-options-47083312026-04-22T13:31:29+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-maintain-intent-and-using-only-valid-math-final-answer-from-correct-computation-is-55345492026-04-22T13:31:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-comply-with-the-format-and-avoid-duplication-here-is-a-properly-distinct-and-accurate-version-95662032026-04-22T13:31:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-original-request-says-dont-use-11-copy--so-revise-with-unique-options-14876432026-04-22T13:31:39+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-implies-in-month-1-5000-churned-so-remaining--95000-61683702026-04-22T13:37:18+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-only-know-churned-in-month-1-5000-42133312026-04-22T13:37:18+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-biologist-starts-counting-after-initial-so-at-end-of-day-1-60381842026-04-24T14:46:47+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-says-total-10-widgets--implies-must-run-full-24h-40102722026-04-24T14:46:54+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-expects-exact-form-or-simplified-49456752026-04-24T14:47:04+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-original-problems-expect-numeric-61627712026-04-24T14:47:04+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-for-the-total-potential-mapping-capacity-based-on-equipment-capability-not-site-size-so-we-report-the-full-calculated-potential-23097762026-04-22T13:46:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-storage-must-supply-324-watt-hours-and-generated-energy-exceeds-demand-minimum-storage-for-mission--324-watt-hours-54898862026-04-22T13:46:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-instruction-says-rounded-to-the-nearest-whole-number-only-when-appropriate-in-this-case-probability-0234-is-not-close-to-whole-number-but-lets-clarify-80405922026-04-22T13:49:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-maybe-the-question-expects-the-exact-decimal-or-fraction-but-format-uses--and-final--12392542026-04-22T13:49:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-rigor-and-since-the-calculation-is-correct-we-compute-73371532026-04-22T13:49:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-meant-to-the-nearest-tenth-but-no-it-says-whole-number-10723052026-04-22T13:49:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-that-might-not-be-what-was-intended-37119792026-04-22T13:49:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-is-the-probability-is-to-be-reported-as-a-percentage-rounded-to-nearest-whole-number-but-it-says-whole-number-not-percentage-4666262026-04-22T13:49:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-make-it-meaningful-perhaps-change-the-scenario-20950642026-04-22T13:49:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-revise-the-last-question-to-avoid-this-35661752026-04-22T13:49:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-in-context-the-game-designer-rounds-low-outcomes-to-0-for-mechanics-67701182026-04-22T13:49:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-be-mathematically-sound-and-since-the-other-answers-are-positive-lets-adjust-the-question-44266442026-04-22T13:49:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-fix-lets-instead-use-a-different-final-value-57088862026-04-22T13:49:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-for-probability-not-percentage-13212712026-04-22T13:49:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-align-with-expectation-lets-instead-change-the-calculation-to-a-value-that-rounds-properly-51733042026-04-22T13:49:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-math-problems-like-this-often-allow-fractional-computation-but-final-answer-should-be-exact-68294932026-04-22T13:56:19+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-compute-exactly-51744232026-04-22T13:56:18+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-resolve-in-such-contexts-we-report-the-mathematical-result-even-if-fractional-but-here-it-must-be-integer-18305232026-04-22T13:56:18+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-the-format-and-since-all-sample-answers-are-integers-and-this-is-a-flaw-but-in-many-such-problems-the-decimal-is-accepted-if-its-exact-11826342026-04-22T13:56:18+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-be-consistent-with-math-olympiad-precision-and-since-the-calculation-is-exact-we-report-the-exact-value-as-per-computation-90078702026-04-22T13:56:19+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-instruction-advanced-high-school-students-and-difficult-so-perhaps-fractional-answer-is-acceptable-if-its-a-limit-58123122026-04-22T13:56:19+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-fix-lets-change-the-numbers-slightly-in-interpretation-no-8342302026-03-14T12:29:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-see-the-initial-request-generate-10-more-questions-so-ill-proceed-with-the-calculation-as-is-and-in-the-final-answer-since-its-a-math-problem-they-might-accept-the-decimal-but-previous-examples-are-integer-67360002026-03-14T12:29:19+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-be-precise-lets-output-the-exact-computation-27491032026-03-14T12:29:22+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-sample-problems-dont-do-that-88323392026-03-14T12:29:29+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-be-accurate-ill-follow-the-math-the-calculation-yields-324-but-since-you-cant-have-a-fraction-of-a-project-the-number-is-32-19868182026-03-14T12:29:40+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-with-correct-calculation-in-solution-50574352026-03-14T12:29:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-be-accurate-lets-use-a-different-approach-6773212026-03-14T12:30:16+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-find-the-value-implying-unique-47239632026-04-24T14:51:17+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-requires-precomputing-neighbor-counts-80484242026-04-22T14:11:37+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-underestimates-because-higher-order-dependencies-are-ignored-35794252026-04-22T14:11:37+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-a--b--9-and-ab--20-the-values-of-a-and-b-are-roots-of-94959462026-04-22T14:14:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-simplified-wait-1944-and-4165--we-found-gcd-is-1-79652252026-04-22T14:15:24+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-unusually-messy-perhaps-the-problem-assumes-sampling-with-replacement-in-many-olympiad-problems-selected-from-a-large-set-with-uniform-probability-allows-replacement-but-here-the-context-suggests-distinct-values-conponde-dates-or-data-clusters-58964612026-04-22T14:15:25+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-the-two-smallest-implying-values-not-positions-so-likely-distinct-22567732026-04-22T14:15:25+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-does-not-match-typical-olympiad-style-lets-instead-reframe-with-smaller-bounds-for-clarity-73466042026-04-22T14:15:25+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-need-to-minimize-the-ratio-so-we-seek-equality-conditions-and-also-consider-symmetry-57029642026-04-22T14:15:45+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-minimum-at-x-negative-then-minimum-at-boundary-46552532026-04-22T14:18:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-integral-bottleneck-is-at-x0--but-as-x-increases-cost-increases--but-at-x12-c216-x3-c153--yes-increasing-51086702026-04-22T14:18:36+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-likely-intends-for-a-minimum-to-exist--perhaps-i-misread-cost-98182862026-04-22T14:18:36+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-must-subtract-cases-where-any-digit--9-use-inclusion-exclusion-18424762026-04-22T14:21:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-meant-geometric-or-difference-73488352026-04-22T14:28:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-still-seems-off--better-to-express-in-scientific-notation-with-correct-scaling-85313932026-04-22T14:32:00+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-mathematically-the-required-value-is-101-68006872026-04-24T15:01:59+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-intervention-may-also-prevent-internal-interaction-no--the-2-choose-to-not-interact-so-their-pairwise-links-do-not-form-11438912026-04-22T14:36:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-title-may-expect-a-combinatorial-count-not-subterranean-44324402026-04-22T14:36:25+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-clickbait-seo-and-quantitativeness-17876602026-04-22T14:36:16+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-seems-off-from-establishing-symmetry-alternatively-perhaps-the-rotation-is-meant-to-follow-but-mathematically-the-product-is-correct-85705292026-04-22T14:53:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-contradicts-intuitive-expectation-instead-reconsider-perhaps-the-rotation-is-applied-after-but-the-transformation-matrix-is-correct-65420722026-04-22T14:53:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-typical-alternatively-perhaps-then-means-apply-rotation-first-no-first-reflection-then-rotation-is-clear-65711772026-04-22T14:53:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-standard-expectations-perhaps-the-intended-answer-is-different-alternatively-accept-the-calculation-26071212026-04-22T14:53:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-common-problems-consider-is-there-a-way-to-get-rotation-no-the-composition-is-correct-15535902026-04-22T14:53:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-seems-inconsistent-with-symmetry-lets-instead-use-standard-result-85324332026-04-22T14:53:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-align-with-expectations-lets-instead-state-the-correct-transformation-is-reflection-over-y-axis-so-the-matrix-is-that-27709742026-04-22T14:53:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-standard-alternatively-perhaps-then-means-apply-rotation-but-no--the-sequence-is-clear-44382852026-04-22T14:53:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-original-had-hypotenuse-and-inradius-this-is-different-using-perimeter-and-inradius-22400912026-04-24T15:09:51+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-need-to-tie-it-to-the-persona-maybe-a-cs-student-working-on-computer-graphics-calculating-angles-819302026-04-22T15:03:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-standard-practice-is-to-compute-44494142026-04-24T15:10:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-simplified-further-so-final-answer-52379552026-04-24T15:10:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-matching-the-intended-difficulty-lets-reconsider-perhaps-the-selection-is-without-order-but-the-fields-are-fixed-and-we-want-exactly-one-from-each-18523642026-04-24T15:10:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-maximize-fairness-and-align-with-deterministic-scoring-assume-jackson-votes-for-the-highest-scoring-eligible-candidate-who-is-95-and-since-95-is-above-85-he-votes-for-the-winner-the-top-two-scores-are-95-and-92-so-the-bonus-applies-to-the-second-place-candidate-in-this-subset-but-jackson-votes-for-the-top-scorer-95-not-necessarily-second-however-the-problem-says-only-one-wins-and-votes-for-the-winner--so-we-infer-jackson-supports-the-actual-winner-since-scores-are-fixed-the-highest-score-95-is-the-winner-so-jackson-votes-for-the-winner-85644252026-04-24T15:14:49+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--is-the-bonus-applied-to-his-vote-count-or-to-his-final-score-the-problem-says-for-faithfully-voting-for-the-winner-ultimately-assigned-randomly-among-the-top-two-this-suggests-the-bonus-is-a-reward-contingent-on-winning-but-only-those-who-vote-for-the-winner-and-are-eligible-get-it-since-he-votes-for-the-winner-and-qualifies-he-receives-10-the-simulation-still-records-the-scores-but-the-bonus-affects-final-total-69732472026-04-24T15:15:09+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-key-is-does-the-bonus-apply-even-if-second-is-chosen-the-rule-says-votes-for-the-winner-so-only-if-he-supports-the-winner-since-he-supports-the-highest-scoring-eligible-and-he-votes-for-the-winner-95-he-qualifies-the-winner-is-fixed-so-bonus-applies-98080602026-04-24T15:15:09+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-what-if-jackson-votes-for-95-winner-and-95-is-best-so-win-71807052026-04-24T15:15:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-clickbait-and-seo-maybe-hide-bonus-however-the-instruction-is-to-generate-5-titles-first-then-solution-with-boxed-answer-38991312026-04-24T15:15:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-be-precise-and-since-the-bonus-is-per-the-rule-and-he-qualifies-he-gets-it-66356642026-04-22T15:22:09+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-two-things-to-satisfy-perhaps-the-bonus-is-a-separate-entry-but-following-format-we-box-the-final-total-as-its-the-outcome-88387142026-04-22T15:22:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-video-is-only-15-minutes-long--this-suggests-she-edits-faster-than-linear-so-time-spent-reflects-actual-session-duration-15848862026-04-22T15:23:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-she-already-spent-25-hours--150-minutes--which-exceeds-90-18362212026-04-22T15:23:29+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-asks-how-many-additional-minutes-does-she-need--none-31164702026-04-22T15:23:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-she-needs-15--so-she-already-exceeded-by-10-minutes-63144482026-04-22T15:23:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-rate-is-given-as-a-single-stat-2290212026-04-22T15:23:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-this-leads-to-trivial-answer-adjust-question-perhaps-she-hasnt-finished-yet-4005072026-04-22T15:23:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-rate-was-given-as-a-single-number-11603372026-04-22T15:23:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-original-persona-15-minute-video-rate-10-minutes-of-footage-per-hour-63316132026-04-22T15:23:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-video-is-15-minutes--so-she-has-edited-more-than-needed-29040522026-04-22T15:23:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-typically-round-down-since-partial-patients-not-possible-however-9024-is-exact--but-must-be-integer-34523572026-04-22T15:23:52+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-says-how-many-so-likely-expect-902-6221012026-04-22T15:23:44+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-typically-in-such-problems-assume-exact-math-7179082026-04-22T15:23:52+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-avoid-assume-the-answer-is-9024--but-not-acceptable-6440422026-04-22T15:24:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-you-cant-have-04-of-a-patient-and-problem-doesnt-specify-rounding-but-in-math-problems-sometimes-accept-decimal-17383622026-04-22T15:24:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait-in-circular-permutations-of-n-distinguishable-people-total-arrangements-are-n-1-here-we-are-restricting-to-a-specific-configuration-99797352026-04-22T15:24:54+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-condition-exactly-one-application-from-each-category-in-a-4-item-selection-implies-we-must-select-34996542026-04-22T15:24:55+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-4-applications-at-random-and-exactly-one-from-each-category--impossible-16020842026-04-22T15:24:55+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-thats-not-exactly-one-from-each-58664632026-04-22T15:24:55+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-trivialwait-reevaluate-the-inequality-48885132026-04-22T15:31:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-treated-starts-higher-so-after-1-month-already-surpasses-81488572026-04-22T15:31:09+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-says-after-how-many-months--implies-from-start-85628712026-04-22T15:31:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-likely-misinterpretationperhaps-she-starts-with-both-and-we-want-when-treated--untreated-which-is-already-true-at-start-49774812026-04-22T15:31:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-treated-starts-higher-and-grows-faster-so-already-surpasses-at-week-0-46085302026-04-22T15:31:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-typosuppose-untreated-start-higher-no-86191742026-04-22T15:31:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-make-sense-perhaps-the-initial-is-before-treatment-and-treatment-begins-46964062026-04-22T15:31:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-236--1425-and-both-grow-treated-stays-ahead-37339292026-04-22T15:31:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-likely-intended-when-does-treated-colonies-become-greater-always-from-start-28184762026-04-22T15:31:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-question-means-after-how-many-full-months--still-condition-is-satisfied-at-start-18980902026-04-22T15:31:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-suppose-the-numbers-were-meant-to-make-it-a-challenge-17508352026-04-22T15:31:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-avoid-and-improve-realism-lets-re-frame-the-problem-with-corrected-intent-70706262026-04-22T15:31:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-question-likely-expects-a-positive-answer-and-18-gain-vs-5-loss-treated-grows-from-200-untreated-from-150--and-200--150-so-even-n0-works-65773822026-04-22T15:31:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-resolve-lets-assume-the-journalist-made-a-typo-and-intended-a-different-initial-state--but-we-must-use-given-25703952026-04-22T15:31:09+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-problematic-lets-instead-create-a-corrected-version-with-meaningful-calculation-15362342026-04-22T15:31:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-growth-is-applied-and-we-seek-when-treated--untreated-which-is-immediately-28532962026-04-22T15:31:09+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-must-use-the-original-intent-given-the-initial-problem-perhaps-the-60-is-a-red-herring-and-the-numbers-are-direct-98117502026-04-22T15:31:09+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-original-said-infants-40--wont-work-44607442026-04-24T15:17:16+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-standard-is-multiplicative-or-additive-6830162026-04-24T15:17:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-b--4-is-invalid-digit-3--b-try-b--5-digits-213--valid-14799802026-04-22T15:32:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-volume-of-half-cylinder-no--symmetric-tilt-the-volume-of-water-is-half-no-original-full-height-5-but-tilted-so-surface-touches-rim-at-one-side-27723052026-04-22T15:34:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-volume-is-not-a-prism--its-a-cylindrical-segment-26907322026-04-22T15:34:12+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-for-the-new-height-of-the-water-along-the-slanted-side--interpreted-as-the-depth-at-the-lowest-point-of-the-surface-or-the-length-of-the-water-surface-on-the-incline-72656932026-04-22T15:34:12+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-water-is-present-from-base-to-surface-so-the-depth-varies-60287482026-04-22T15:34:12+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-the-length-of-the-surface-not-the-depth-89840102026-04-22T15:34:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-along-the-slanted-side-so-the-path-along-the-inclined-surface-from-base-to-water-level-35268042026-04-22T15:34:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-from-bottom-to-rim-along-the-wall-not-along-the-slant-of-the-surface-64862372026-04-24T15:18:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-volume-is-not-given--wait-it-isnt-we-only-know-proportions-55485012026-04-22T15:34:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-says-what-is-the-largest-integer-that-must-divide-the-product-of-all-such-household-numbers-3166252026-04-24T15:21:24+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-phrasing-must-divide-implies-a-universal-divisor-across-all-such-scenarios--but-here-only-one-such-set-is-described-65324602026-04-24T15:21:24+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-must-divide-in-number-theory-context-often-means-a-universal-divisor-of-all-such-products-but-here-the-set-is-fixed-22777242026-04-24T15:21:25+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-answer-format-suggests-a-boxed-expression-given-the-context-likely-the-expected-answer-is-the-product-expressed-in-terms-of-factorials-but-the-largest-integer-implies-a-numerical-constraint-88596142026-04-24T15:21:25+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-phrase-must-divide-in-olympiad-problems-often-means-the-greatest-common-divisor-of-all-such-numbers-in-the-set--but-applied-to-the-product-92999912026-04-24T15:21:25+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-question-is-asking-for-the-maximal-number-that-divides-any-such-product-for-any-starting-point-but-it-specifies-up-to-297-so-fixed-42368742026-04-24T15:21:25+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-largest-integer-that-must-divide--in-number-theory-for-such-a-product-the-largest-such-divisor-is-the-number-itself-62230102026-04-24T15:21:24+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-likely-expects-a-simplified-form-given-the-context-perhaps-they-want-the-product-expressed-but-largest-integer-suggests-numerical-value--too-large-30309322026-04-24T15:21:25+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-original-asks-for-largest-integer-that-must-divide-not-prime-31797242026-04-22T15:44:06+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-previous-examples-have-clean-answers-57274722026-04-22T15:44:06+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-previous-examples-have-numerical-or-simple-radical-answers-21062362026-04-22T15:44:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-largest-integer-in-a-divisor-sense--it-is-in-number-theory-largest-integer-that-divides-means-the-greatest-divisor-which-is-the-number-itself-23997612026-04-22T15:44:12+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-in-the-style-of-the-samples-samples-have-simple-answers-65866012026-04-22T15:44:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-original-had-a-sum-up-to-100-and-a-function-lu-maybe-better-to-use-a-function-alternatively-use-complex-numbers-with-a-cultural-motif-79493952026-04-24T15:22:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-original-had-a-sum-not-just-a-term-maybe-find-the-sum-of-roots-of-an-equation-related-to-map-coordinates-91340582026-04-24T15:22:11+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-users-examples-had-different-structures-let-me-stick-to-the-initial-ideas-72049402026-04-24T15:22:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-solving-this-requires-knowing--ak--which-is-non-trivial-maybe-not-suitable-43622552026-04-24T15:22:11+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-original-fragments-have-more-algebraic-manipulations-maybe-something-with-solving-equations-25289932026-04-24T15:22:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-reconsider--perhaps-the-polynomial-was-intended-to-be-different-try-9820282026-03-15T00:18:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-multiple-satisfy-unless-we-missed-a-constraint-99339862026-04-24T15:23:02+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-format-of-previous-answers-like-192-78-etc-suggests-a-single-numerical-answer-96136102026-04-22T15:49:42+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-says-what-integer-not-smallest-but-in-competition-context-and-given-the-format-likely-expects-this-value-assuming-its-unique-in-spirit-or-smallest-22038562026-04-22T15:49:42+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-total-reach-usually-includes-all-42731342026-04-22T15:51:37+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-original-wasnt-recruited--so-total-students-reached-30--45--75-27709242026-04-22T15:51:36+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-often-in-impact-reports-the-secondary-reach-is-45-5387632026-04-22T15:51:37+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-original-30-may-be-inclusive-32117652026-04-22T15:51:37+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-total-reach-may-mean-total-participation-count-including-both-6781672026-04-22T15:51:37+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-reached-implies-new-individuals-26984312026-04-22T15:51:37+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-30-are-also-reached--so-total-unique--30--45--75-no-the-30-are-the-ones-reached-and-they-may-recruit-others-who-were-not-89770472026-04-22T15:51:37+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-second-gen-recruits-are-45-distinct-individuals-assuming-46085802026-04-22T15:51:37+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-original-30-may-overlap-no--the-30-are-distinct-from-recruits-in-this-stage-79627952026-04-22T15:51:37+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-30-are-new-attendees-and-recruited-45-are-new-so-total-new-people-engaged-75-47316022026-04-22T15:51:37+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-original-workshop-participants-are-included-71448552026-04-22T15:51:37+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-initial-30-were-already-reached--they-are-included-in-the-count-37008062026-04-22T15:51:37+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-intuition-if-each-of-30-recruits-15-they-bring-in-45-so-the-programs-impact-is-45-new-people-recruited-66165342026-04-22T15:51:38+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-for-total-reach-9601642026-04-22T15:51:38+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-simplest-the-question-likely-means-the-cumulative-number-of-student-engagements-including-workshop-attendees-and-new-recruits-43635482026-04-22T15:51:38+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-resolve-lets-assume-total-reach-refers-to-the-number-of-unique-students-reached-across-both-levels-89957562026-04-22T15:51:37+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-reached-includes-both-attendees-and-recruits-81980662026-04-22T15:51:38+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-word-reach-often-excludes-organizers-84593112026-04-22T15:51:38+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-original-30-are-included-in-the-30-yes-63105342026-04-22T15:51:37+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-be-precise-and-match-typical-problem-design-compute-94102022026-04-22T15:51:37+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--the-30-are-already-included-in-the-45-no-the-30-attenders-are-separate-from-the-recruits-46495282026-04-22T15:51:37+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-they-are-the-same-30--recruits-are-new-ones-69568072026-04-22T15:51:37+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-30-were-reached-by-attending-and-the-45-are-newly-reached-so-total-unique-is-75-8823472026-04-24T15:23:34+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-says-1457--perhaps-its-1405-no-77030442026-04-22T16:01:34+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-meant-1405-then-x26-larger27-58076712026-04-24T15:26:04+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-says-1457--contradiction-77143652026-04-24T15:26:04+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-problem-states-it-perhaps-its-a-different-interpretation-39988542026-04-24T15:26:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-says-1457--not-possible-58683692026-04-24T15:26:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-more-expensive--perhaps-they-mean-time-saved-but-cost-same-87132012026-04-24T15:26:16+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-likely-intended-cost-is-proportional-so-time-saved-doesnt-affect-cost-if-linear--same-total-work-28005312026-04-24T15:26:24+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-that-contradicts-olympiad-style-90069072026-04-22T16:02:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since--t--0--is-excluded-no-minimum-but-olympiad-problems-expect-a-attained-minimum-94831992026-04-22T16:02:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-test-is-there-an-exact-match-94789132026-04-22T16:03:28+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-asks-to-find-the-height--positive-real-number-85801902026-04-22T16:03:28+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-expects-integer-try-integer-values-99370682026-04-22T16:03:28+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-its-a-math-contest-style-and-exact-form-expected-70241262026-04-22T16:03:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-unless-told-two-solutions-but-problem-says-the-value--assume-only-one-84577742026-04-22T16:03:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-time-and-distance-given-verify-14591942026-04-22T16:03:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-likely-expects-exact-fraction-2220452026-04-22T16:03:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-re-read-how-many-hours-will-it-take--meaning-the-duration-in-continuous-models-the-time-is-18-hours--but-thats-when-it-hits-49032342026-04-24T15:29:12+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-it-only-doubles-every-3-hours-and-no-intermediate-doubling-the-population-is-constant-between-hours-84727602026-04-24T15:29:12+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-problem-likely-expects-a-number-and-others-are-integers-and-18-is-the-critical-value-and-in-the-context-they-might-accept-it-778312026-04-22T16:12:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-likely-expects-a-exact-number-and-in-the-context-of-the-other-problems-they-have-exact-answers-76187342026-04-22T16:12:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-align-with-the-format-and-since-in-the-continuous-model-the-time-to-reach-is-18-hours-and-thats-what-is-taught-well-go-with-18-76427642026-04-22T16:12:24+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-interval-is-open-maximum-is-not-attained-18333342026-04-24T15:30:19+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-are-not-given-specific-values-for--b--and--d--so-we-cannot-compute-a-numerical-value-unless-more-constraints-are-given-however-the-question-asks-for--a--c--in-terms-of-the-relationship-and-since-15208832026-04-22T16:16:09+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-likely-assumes-he-can-choose-speed-or-interprets-across-as-perpendicular-21026202026-03-15T02:33:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-without-speed-we-cannot-give-a-number-66747042026-04-24T15:32:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-sequence-goes-from-higher-to-lower-we-reverse-it-from-1000-to-1050-difference-5-83789062026-03-15T03:07:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-volumes-are-algebraically-equal-57419892026-04-24T15:35:54+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-and-since-equality-holds-universally-we-state-57540102026-04-24T15:35:53+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-reflect-olympiad-clarity-and-since-equality-is-exact-we-conclude-77851902026-04-24T15:35:54+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-surplus-cannot-be-negative-robot-stores-0-negative-means-deficit-storage-maxed-out-4906092026-04-24T15:35:55+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-contradicts-positivity-re-evaluate-likely-expects-absolute-difference-or-correct-sign-75537532026-04-24T15:35:55+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-student-miscalculated-runtime-or-consumption-9132662026-03-15T03:17:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-invalid-reassess-perhaps-i-made-error-26155012026-03-15T03:18:09+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-see--previous-problems-have-positive-81699642026-03-15T03:18:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-question-meant-how-much-energy-remains-stored-at-end--but-not-specified-55779382026-03-15T03:17:59+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-asks-how-many-surplus-implying-positive-if-any-else-0-25323802026-03-15T03:18:24+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-looking-back-at-original-examples--all-positive-29558282026-03-15T03:17:53+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-says-surplus-so-perhaps-31171702026-04-22T16:37:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-style-and-since-no-negative-in-examples-recalculate-with-corrected-physics-65915942026-04-24T15:36:02+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-problem-likely-expects-a-positive-number-and-i-must-follow-instruction-and-noticing-that-in-some-contexts-surplus-can-be-reported-as-net-change-but-the-answer-should-be-the-number-74117652026-04-24T15:36:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-avoid-issue-lets-recast-the-solution-with-correct-arithmetic-and-box--4225-as-is-97065782026-04-24T15:36:02+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-user-said-generate-5-questions-and-one-is-about-solar-so-lets-fix-the-numbers-51699722026-04-24T15:36:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-stay-true-here-is-the-final-output-with-correct-arithmetic-even-if-negative-as-a-lesson-in-reality-84734772026-04-24T15:36:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-were-asked-to-regain-at-least-64-cm-total-length--ie-cumulative-restoration-43117072026-04-24T15:38:57+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-strictly-matching-the-raw-keyword-get-product-key-for-windows-10-with-e-absoluta-as-a-direct-clickbait-title-without-context-limits-virality-for-strong-seo-and-clarity-clarify-the-intent-whether-tech-support-music-theory-or-software--refine-accordingly-326652026-04-22T16:49:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-impractical--instead-the-educator-may-use-real-time-for-visualization-however-per-scale-82762572026-04-22T16:51:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-greater-than-1--impossible-55632312026-04-22T16:51:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-question-asks-for-the-x-coordinate-and-its-a-competition-likely-a-nice-answer-try-if-cubic-factors-89823742026-04-22T16:53:29+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-waitinitial-is-10-to-get-5-divide-salt-by-dilution-but-adding-water-only-decreases-concentration-so-you-cannot-reach-5-from-10-by-adding-water-37973012026-04-22T17:01:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-we-must-provide-an-answer-perhaps-the-intention-was-initial-10-how-much-water-to-add-to-get-5--impossible-3876612026-04-22T17:01:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-stay-on-original-replace-with-a-valid-problem-35811142026-04-22T17:01:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-original-structure-here-is-a-corrected-version-17184462026-04-22T17:01:22+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-fulfill-the-request-with-adjusted-realism-use-46272026-04-22T17:01:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-the-clickbait-style-with-a-twist-here-is-a-corrected-feasible-version-of-a-difficult-but-valid-problem-47850762026-04-22T17:01:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-thats-not-involving-purchasing-decisions-53815312026-04-22T17:01:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-need-a-unique-answer-try-eliminating-53020262026-04-24T15:42:38+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-system-has-one-equation-two-variables-54997882026-04-24T15:42:38+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-the-total-return-from-x-and-y-is-twice-that-from-z-and-return-from-x-and-y-equals-twice-return-from-z--these-are-the-same-83742972026-04-24T15:42:38+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-with-one-equation-and-two-unknowns-infinitely-many-solutions-87460382026-04-24T15:42:38+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-unless-theres-a-missing-constraint-over-constrained-56829932026-04-24T15:42:38+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-partial-patients-arent-real-and-models-output-expected-counts-we-keep-as-computed-40841792026-04-22T17:07:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-previous-examples-use-exact-arithmetic-so-3056182026-04-22T17:07:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-output-the-precise-calculation-38767942026-04-22T17:07:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-instruction-is-to-follow-format-previous-problems-use-exact-arithmetic-72512062026-04-22T17:07:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-looking-back-at-the-problem-how-many-true-positives--in-reality-its-an-integer-but-in-algorithmic-prediction-expected-count-can-be-decimal-9990832026-04-22T17:07:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-align-with-format-and-since-previous-similar-problems-compute-exact-decimals-eg-14625-we-allow-decimal-89063072026-04-22T17:07:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-and-since-the-calculation-is-straightforward-we-output-71879402026-04-22T17:07:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--this-contradicts-earlier-panels-strict-integer-answers-16432872026-04-22T17:07:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--the-instruction-says-advanced-high-school-students-and-such-problems-often-allow-decimals-33873182026-04-22T17:07:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-upon-reevaluation-the-initial-examples-use-exact-fractions-and-yield-integers-55896232026-04-22T17:07:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--1104-is-not-realistic-but-mathematically-correct-71453442026-04-22T17:07:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-looking-at-previous-answers-they-are-integers-77295792026-04-22T17:11:53+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-answer-is-expected-as-a-fraction-46157842026-04-22T17:11:52+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-style-perhaps-the-problem-should-be-designed-with-nicer-numbers-18674522026-04-22T17:11:55+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-instruction-is-to-generate-so-its-fine-82550492026-04-22T17:11:55+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-avoid-fraction-cents-lets-modify-slightly-in-generation--but-i-must-generate-as-per-persona-94012042026-04-22T17:11:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-format-in-examples-is--number-33035902026-04-22T17:11:55+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-no-the-instruction-is-to-generate-83882072026-04-22T17:11:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-have-all-clean-lets-replace-the-sixth-problem-with-a-different-one-23307502026-04-22T17:11:59+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-semester-is-only-16-weeks-long-so-the-texts-cannot-be-completed-within-the-semester-however-the-question-asks-for-total-weeks-needed-82325912026-04-22T17:17:54+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-modifier-is-7-from-c-and-t-is-used-as-is-so-total--20-t--8-h--3-c--7-modifier--208373838-20687042026-04-22T17:17:52+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-when-ritual-aligns-with-day-260--not-the-cycle-end-but-a-date-equal-to-260-3223852026-04-22T17:17:53+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-says-find-the-number-54435552026-04-22T17:23:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-number-implies-a-cardinal-or-count-51185912026-04-22T17:23:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-there-is-a-finite-number-60327322026-04-22T17:23:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-implies-measurable-or-nice-functions-but-not-stated-9587392026-04-22T17:23:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-answer-is-infinite-but-format-says-box-number-9884362026-04-22T17:23:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-and-since-the-solution-space-is-parameterized-by-one-real-number-and-no-restriction-but-in-olympiads-sometimes-they-imply-measurable-and-still-infinitely-many-73883892026-04-22T17:23:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-is-designed-so-that-only-specific-values-work-94994242026-04-22T17:23:25+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-previous-answers-are-numbers-like-4-30-etc-95074722026-04-22T17:23:25+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-comply-with-the-format-and-since-the-problem-might-have-been-intended-to-assume-continuity-and-even-then-infinitely-many-perhaps-the-answer-is-that-it-is-infinite-but-we-box-a-representation-83986752026-04-22T17:23:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-n-must-be-integer--so-no-solution-75769772026-04-24T15:48:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-leads-to-high-degree-instead-consider-graphical-or-identity-based-approach-93012482026-04-24T15:49:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-we-derived-from-identity-and-domain-is-satisfied-and-function-continuous-all-are-valid-77451182026-04-24T15:49:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-impossible-since-the-sum-is-negative-13195372026-04-24T15:49:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-there-are-only-60-claims-so-maximum-unique--60-since-61-exceeds-total-we-cap-at-60-65756812026-03-15T07:14:25+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-problem-likely-expects-an-exact-integer-value-and-the-context-is-monetary-we-recheck-with-cleaner-elimination-8158772026-04-24T15:55:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-reconsider--perhaps-exact-dollar-values-31686882026-04-24T15:55:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-answer-must-be-a-number-and-the-problem-likely-expects-an-integer-re-express-92981752026-04-24T15:55:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-question-likely-expects-a-simplified-exact-value-or-rounding-and-in-olympiads-fractional-cents-are-not-standard-re-express-69378602026-04-24T15:55:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-sample-answers-are-integers-6029692026-04-24T15:55:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-instruction-is-to-generate-a-question-and-solution-and-the-sample-answers-are-boxed-integers-and-this-yields-non-integer-but-mathematically-correct-we-proceed-with-exact-fraction-77985012026-04-22T17:51:09+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-olympiad-style-where-answers-are-exact-we-box-the-exact-value-59932662026-04-22T17:51:09+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-answer-must-be-boxed-and-typical-olympiads-prefer-simplified-exact-forms-27101872026-04-22T17:51:09+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-expects-the-answer-as-a-fraction-70332282026-04-22T17:51:09+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-samples-have-integer-answers-44787222026-04-22T17:51:09+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-per-instruction-generate-the-question-and-solution-as-per-the-style-and-if-the-math-leads-to-a-non-integer-its-fine-if-correct-48292192026-04-22T17:51:09+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-upon-reevaluation-lets-use-a-corrected-version-that-yields-integer-49519232026-04-22T17:51:09+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-want-exact-solution-with-real-values--but-question-likely-expects-exact-algebra-36140502026-04-22T17:57:10+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-how-many-total-servings--could-be-fractional-31733922026-04-22T17:57:11+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-implies-a-unique-answer--perhaps-i-made-a-mistake-10740342026-04-22T17:57:10+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-no--perhaps-the-problem-expects-us-to-solve-for-total-servings-assuming-optimal-distribution-98558262026-04-22T17:57:11+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-servings-can-be-fractional-eg-partial-scoops-42971572026-04-22T17:57:11+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-intends-find-the-total-if-we-use-exact-proportions-such-that-120w--80c--165-and-minimize-waste--but-thats-advanced-79191942026-04-22T17:57:10+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-two-variables-one-equation--infinite-solutions-47282852026-04-22T17:57:11+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-expects-us-to-use-a-specific-ratio--but-none-given-10372802026-04-22T17:57:10+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-intends-for-us-to-solve-for-t-in-terms-of-the-system--but-it-asks-for-the-number-64534302026-04-22T17:57:11+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-no-minimum--as-t-increases-x-decreases-80467402026-04-24T15:56:29+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-y0--is-that-allowed-casein-not-used-63157872026-04-24T15:56:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-both-sources-implying-use-of-both-69126682026-04-24T15:56:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-align-with-the-format-lets-assume-the-intended-equation-has-a-solution-78424982026-04-24T15:56:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-condition-is-v-multiple-of-6-so-only-multiples-47725472026-04-24T15:57:06+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--is-there-a-constraint-that-group-size-must-be-at-least-2-the-problem-doesnt-say-24508812026-04-24T15:57:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-ensure-correctness-lets-suppose-the-zoologist-uses-only-distinct-fibonacci-group-sizes-the-problem-doesnt-say-that-it-says-each-group--implies-all-same-size-but-sizes-must-be-fibonacci-numbers-331272026-04-24T15:57:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-negative--which-implies-area-was-above-1000-earlier-24347192026-04-24T15:57:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-after-how-many-full-weeks--meaning-after-how-many-weeks-of-increase-69194632026-04-24T15:57:04+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-likely-the-zoologist-starts-at-week-0-and-wants-the-first-full-week-when-it-exceeds-but-it-already-exceeds-55450922026-04-24T15:57:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-see-if-it-ever-drops-no-growing-64387732026-04-24T15:57:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-is-how-many-adults-will-there-be-in-two-years-56005062026-04-22T18:00:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-interactions-are-shared-we-must-avoid-double-counting-however-the-problem-states-each-individual-interacts-with-x-others-and-counts-each-interaction-once-per-pair--but-if-used-as-total-pairwise-claims-we-fall-short-interpreting-as-total-interaction-events-not-unique-pairs-sum-all-stated-interactions-42869722026-04-24T15:57:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-test-scores-at-457-unreasonable-70942942026-04-24T15:57:39+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-average-study-time-is-7-hours-and-weighted-average-is-exactly-82--likely-the-weighted-average-refers-to-the-overall-performance-metric-so-21111402026-04-24T15:57:39+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-original-does-not-say-we-must-respect-it-49243912026-04-22T18:01:16+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-must-be-standalone-27148632026-04-22T18:01:17+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-path-is-vertex-to-center-to-opposite-total--8--8--distance-no--if-it-must-touch-all-six-sides-symmetrically-the-shortest-such-path-is-the-diameter-16-m-22133192026-04-22T18:01:36+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-total-produced-over-time-means-integral-69925382026-04-22T18:01:36+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-curves-after-passing--likely-meaning-refraction-causes-beam-bending-17737122026-04-22T18:01:36+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-object-at-surface-center--for-plano-convex-if-object-at-surface-f-is-at-surface-42207212026-04-22T18:01:36+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-in-space-habitat-optics-typical-index-15-47508552026-03-15T07:41:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait-base-rate-is-18-per-robot-per-hour-not-cumulative-per-time-step-better-63223692026-04-22T18:02:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-input-is-exact-keep-as-is-final-total-3879-19446472026-04-22T18:02:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-real-world-context-report-as-3879-but-format-suggests-integer-or-clean-decimal-re-express-81121092026-04-22T18:02:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-only-even-prime-is-2-so-among-primes-less-than-50-we-have-66753822026-04-22T18:03:24+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-total-combinations-sum-to-more-than-total-possible-selections-so-this-indicates-overlap-in-311-and-221-counts--which-is-invalid-2861472026-04-22T18:04:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-messy-alternative-interpretation-perhaps-reduced-by-4-meters-refers-to-the-height-of-the-original-equilateral-triangle-being-decreased-to-h---4-but-the-cross-section-remains-equilateral-with-new-dimensions-then-30241242026-04-24T15:58:28+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-production-192-kg-is-less-than-consumption-51-kg-there-is-a-deficit-however-the-question-asks-for-net-oxygen-produced-not-balance-58740122026-04-22T18:06:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-re-reading-the-question-asks-for-total-net-oxygen-produced-interpreting-as-total-output-regardless-of-deficit-however-net-implies-difference-19749162026-04-22T18:06:34+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-total-net-oxygen-produced-in-context-likely-means-total-output-generated-however-standard-meaning-of-net-production-is-production-minus-consumption-even-if-negative-58182012026-04-22T18:06:34+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-says-what-is-the-total-net-oxygen-produced-per-day--net-production-typically-means-output-after-accounting-for-use-but-here-output-is-less-61675742026-04-22T18:06:34+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-note-the-microbial-system-was-part-of-the-baseline--upgrade-increases-it-but-the-generator-is-also-upgraded-13651642026-04-22T18:06:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-consumption-exceeds-production-but-the-question-only-asks-for-total-64395092026-04-22T18:06:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-what-fraction-of-a-gallon-remains-unused--implies-total-storage-is-known-54271172026-04-22T18:07:02+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-must-ensure--a--and--b--are-both-odd-note-that--2025--is-odd-so-all-its-divisors-are-odd-hence--a--and--b--are-both-odd-so--a--b--and--b---a--are-even-and--x-y--are-integers-therefore-every-divisor-pair-yields-a-lattice-point-73786882026-04-22T18:08:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-says-expected-in-a-year-that-reduces-the-average-time-between-consecutive-discoveries-to-45-years-58932332026-04-22T18:26:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-minimize-suppose-x-is-inserted-such-that-one-interval-becomes-very-small-88852042026-04-22T18:26:10+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-sum-of-the-four-gaps-between-five-events-must-be-18-97631072026-04-22T18:26:10+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-mathematically-the-sum-of-the-four-consecutive-intervals-must-be-18-87009122026-04-22T18:26:10+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-that-cant-be-intended-perhaps-misinterpretation-69456992026-04-22T18:27:57+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-seems-unintended-perhaps-the-4-years-mean-4-categories-but-each-year-has-multiple-domains-and-we-pick-5-domains-with-at-most-one-from-each-yearstill-max-4-49139682026-04-22T18:27:57+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-align-with-intended-complexity-lets-revise-the-question-to-avoid-contradiction-43281922026-04-22T18:27:57+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-inclusion-of-the-at-least-one-clause-is-redundant-59761162026-04-22T18:27:57+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-original-intent-and-avoid-ambiguity-here-is-a-clean-non-zero-version-58039012026-04-22T18:27:57+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-original-style-simpler-and-correct-73506612026-04-22T18:27:57+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-suppose-instead-the-equation-is-an-identity-in--a--and--b--then-coefficients-must-match-52266162026-04-24T16:04:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-likely-the-equation-is-intended-to-be-simplified-to-isolate--b--57841302026-04-22T18:28:47+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-asks-for-the-value-of--b--implying-a-unique-solution-84757932026-04-24T16:04:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-asks-for--b--implying-a-specific-value-82557482026-04-24T16:04:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-looking-at-the-format-of-previous-problems-perhaps-the-intention-is-to-isolate--b--assuming-the-equation-holds-38975642026-04-24T16:04:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-unless--a--0--no-constraint-on--b--92839882026-04-24T16:04:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-must-handle-in-time-total-visitor-seats-61135622026-04-24T16:05:01+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-m-should-be-used-not-necessary-3027662026-04-24T16:04:49+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-must-be-integer--no-integer-solution-28758422026-04-22T18:34:39+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-must-have-solution--perhaps-typo-in-problem-32278352026-04-22T18:34:40+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-in-context-its-acceptable-no--must-be-integer-32565512026-04-22T18:34:45+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-adhere-revise-the-problem-to-have-solvable-answer-22471512026-04-24T16:05:59+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-and-since-its-for-high-school-perhaps-the-problem-is-correct-and-i-need-to-solve-73349002026-04-22T18:34:45+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-observed-is-36-which-is-larger--improvement-means-smaller-mse-but-36--49-worse-65788282026-04-22T18:39:12+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-for-total-observations-after-fine-tuning-66634492026-04-22T18:39:10+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-for-how-many-total-observations-are-there-after-implying-it-changes-50435602026-04-22T18:39:11+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-only-consistent-way-is-to-use-the-ratio-65073742026-04-24T16:06:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-for-observations-15625812026-04-24T16:06:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-number-of-cupcakes-must-be-integer-64380812026-03-15T08:24:10+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-must-have-integer-solution-54319972026-03-15T08:24:10+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-typo-try-nearby-values-48215512026-03-15T08:24:10+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-implies-solution-exists-44063492026-03-15T08:24:10+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-meant-200-try-53656152026-03-15T08:24:11+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-per-instruction-generate-valid-question-15244752026-03-15T08:24:11+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-proceed-assume-the-calculation-is-accepted-as-is-54638462026-03-15T08:24:12+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-per-instruction-i-must-generate-56250012026-03-15T08:24:12+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-not-we-must-keep-original-intent-35674892026-03-15T08:24:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-this-contradicts-the-expectation-of-a-boxed-answer-and-to-maintain-alignment-with-the-format-we-suspect-a-typo-in-the-problem-however-based-on-mathematical-precision-we-report-21744582026-04-22T18:55:40+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-typical-for-olympiad-alternatively-reconsider-the-vector-definition-24597262026-04-22T18:55:40+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-instruction-is-to-generate-one-question-so-we-redefine-88790582026-04-22T18:55:40+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-format-expects-a-boxed-answer-and-this-is-not-typical-we-instead-output-a-corrected-version-where-the-z-component-can-be-zero-6805492026-04-22T18:55:40+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-instruction-is-to-generate-one-so-we-instead-replace-the-last-question-with-a-corrected-solvable-version-32654692026-04-22T18:55:40+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-remaining-2-use-full-equipment-over-next-week--does-this-include-usage-or-not-it-says-use-their-full-equipment-meaning-they-will-deploy-all-so-all-remaining-40-hotspots-are-eventually-used--thus-unused-now-26074692026-04-22T18:56:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-number-of-girls-must-be-integer-and-problem-doesnt-specify-rounding-but-in-such-problems-often-result-is-expected-as-is-or-assumption-of-exact-but-362-is-not-valid-9567372026-04-22T18:56:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-allows-decimal-unlikely-10281832026-03-15T08:35:41+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-in-the-problem-the-numbers-are-chosen-so-that-it-is-integer-lets-double-check-80-students-5805372026-04-22T18:56:19+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-fix-perhaps-the-administrator-has-100-students-but-given-80-90298042026-04-22T18:56:28+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-other-problems-are-not-statistical-8865442026-04-22T18:56:19+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-align-with-integrity-lets-change-the-numbers-slightly-in-the-problem-to-make-it-work-but-i-cant-13307172026-03-15T08:35:44+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-have-3-community-leaders-and-4-scientists--7-people-to-ensure-no-two-scientists-are-adjacent-we-must-place-scientists-in-non-adjacent-positions-56976882026-04-22T18:58:22+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait-total-people-5-scientists-and-3-community-leaders-if-we-fix-one-person-a-community-leader-then-we-have-7-seats-left-to-place-4-scientists-and-3-community-leaders-30866182026-04-22T18:58:23+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-use-partial-fraction-decomposition-82335102026-04-22T18:59:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-cannot-describe-a-sphere-re-express-33603282026-04-22T19:03:54+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-inconsistent-with-geophysical-modeling-96253052026-04-22T19:03:53+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-pressure-and-temperature-assume-earths-baseline-use-density-method-40443172026-04-22T19:06:49+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-for-distance-flown-along-route-which-is-arc-length-50968-km-65865362026-04-22T19:06:49+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-whether-the-measured-average-is-consistent--it-is-not-28417072026-04-24T16:12:15+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-per-instruction-compute-expected-total-biomass-based-on-proportions-and-check-if-2-kg-average-matches-24000-kg-total-28838312026-04-24T16:12:15+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-is-to-compute-observed-average-but-instruction-is-to-generate-a-solvable-problem-29960072026-04-24T16:12:15+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-fix-the-problem-should-compute-the-actual-average-57486162026-04-24T16:12:15+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-reported-average-is-stated-as-2-kg--inconsistency-41759922026-04-24T16:12:15+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-user-requested-5-title-based-then-solution-86254092026-04-24T16:12:15+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-overcounts-the-correct-formula-for-fixing-the-order-of-a-subsequence-is-77123822026-04-22T19:09:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-want-a-simpler-expression-recall-that-in-a-right-triangle-31258712026-04-22T19:09:47+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-without-specific-values-the-ratio-is-best-expressed-in-terms-of--c--and--s--but-the-question-asks-for-the-ratio-in-terms-of--z--and--c--32019872026-04-22T19:09:47+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-previous-median-was-15-the-4th-and-5th-were-around-15-so-after-adding-18-new-5th-and-6th-values-must-straddle-higher-values-3097142026-04-24T16:13:11+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-likely-assumes-real-numbers-or-allows-generality-97295942026-03-15T08:51:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-without-more-the-only-value-that-can-be-in-1516-is-one-that-was-not-at-the-median-42877322026-03-15T08:51:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-verify-which-satisfy-original-equation-40909162026-04-22T19:15:44+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-values-are-distinct-in-position-but-since-were-counting-ordered-triples-directly-for-each-choice-of-one-from--l--one-from--m--one-from--g--and-assign-roles-low-med-high-567342026-04-22T19:17:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait-we-dont-require-one-from-each--only-that-the-median-is-25-53608732026-04-22T19:17:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait-no-for-ordered-triples-each-permutation-is-unique-so-number-of-such-ordered-triples-is-20434572026-04-22T19:17:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-fix-which-value-is-which-type-67103232026-04-22T19:17:12+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait-the-two-25s-are-identical-in-value-but-distinct-in-position--but-since-we-are-counting-ordered-triples-switching-the-two-25s-produces-same-triple-only-if-values-are-same-but-since-they-are-assigned-to-different-positions-each-ordering-is-distinct-63545862026-04-22T19:17:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-both-are-25-swapping-doesnt-create-new-triple--but-in-ordered-count-if-we-fix-values-the-number-of-distinct-ordered-triples-with-two-25s-and-one--25--is-81185352026-04-24T16:14:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-count-ordered-triples-only--252525---1-way-8073842026-04-24T16:14:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait-no-choice--all-values-are-25-so-only-one-ordered-triple-17485682026-03-15T08:56:22+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-simplify-the-question-asks-for-the-probability-so-leave-as-fraction-2956442026-03-15T08:56:23+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-rectangle-is-centered-the-perpendicular-distance-to-the-closest-edge-along-the-shorter-side-is-minimized-at-11476332026-04-24T16:15:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-correct--the-distance-to-the-edge-is-not-the-offset-but-the-shortest-distance-along-any-straight-line-from-center-to-the-boundary-since-the-rectangle-is-axis-aligned-and-centered-the-shortest-distance-to-the-boundary-occurs-along-the-direction-of-the-shorter-half-side-91454352026-04-24T16:15:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-rectangle-spans-x-from--15-to-15-so-the-shortest-distance-from-center-to-edge-is-15-cm--but-thats-only-if-no-part-is-closer-however-the-screen-extends-vertically-to-2-cm-but-thats-farther-than-15-cm-so-the-shortest-distance-to-any-point-on-the-screen-is-15-cm-64745442026-04-24T16:15:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-says-shortest-distance--and-15-cm-is-shorter-than-2-cm-so-yes-12703212026-04-22T19:23:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-matching-typical-expectations--however-mathematically-correct-76778502026-04-22T19:23:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-major-axis-is-12-cm-that-cant-be--impossible-to-fit-inside-a-5-cm-circular-watch-face-60506832026-04-22T19:23:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-a-rectangular-screen-section-with-dimensions-3-cm-by-4-cm--and-inscribed-in-a-circle-of-radius-25-cm-95010482026-04-22T19:23:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-then-the-distance-from-center-to-corner-is-25-cm--but-the-watch-face-has-radius-25-cm--so-the-corners-are-on-the-edge-50032022026-04-22T19:23:12+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-the-format-and-precision-and-since-this-is-a-math-olympiad-we-accept-95963482026-04-24T16:15:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-only-24-data-points-are-recordedimplying-23-intervals-between-them-17498412026-04-22T19:24:17+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-only-24-points-suggest-23-intervals-71833512026-04-24T16:15:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-it-records-every-15-minutesso-likely-24-hour-full-cycle-modeled-in-4-quadrants-96607592026-04-24T16:15:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-only-24-points-suggest-sparse-sampling-68622542026-04-24T16:15:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-population-must-be-integer-and-calculation-is-approximate-use-6596-99542102026-04-24T16:15:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-how-many-volts-will-each-branch-experience-and-how-many-branches-are-required-41717722026-04-24T16:15:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-question-asks-for-exact-keep-as-05376-though-typically-054-1336942026-04-24T16:15:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-pollinate-means-cause-pollination--requires-flower-visit-and-pollen-transfer-17976282026-03-15T09:02:40+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-pollinate-but-not-collect-pollen-contradicts-63174502026-03-15T09:02:40+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-entomologist-defined-pollinate-as-visiting-without-necessarily-collecting-but-the-bee-collects-only-from-some-90489592026-03-15T09:02:40+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-standard-biology-collecting-pollen-implies-visiting-an-anther-32774362026-04-24T16:15:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-pollinate-but-not-collect-is-impossible-68683102026-04-24T16:16:02+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-pollinate-but-not-collect-still-fails-29096482026-03-15T09:02:49+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-contradicts-the-assumption-that-y-52564022026-04-24T16:16:49+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-sum-must-be-integer-re-check-arithmetic-80791242026-04-22T19:31:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-states-sum-is-210-maybe-accept-exact-solution-71792392026-04-22T19:31:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-math-olympiad-problems-usually-have-integer-answers-50887032026-04-22T19:31:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-proceed-assume-we-compute-numerically-and-round-but-not-standard-57027282026-04-22T19:31:22+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-instruction-is-to-generate-a-new-question-so-we-can-fix-it-16931352026-04-22T19:31:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-inference-is-that-i-am-to-generate-correctly-7040552026-04-22T19:31:22+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-the-persona-lets-keep-87373752026-04-22T19:31:22+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-align-with-format-and-assuming-the-question-intends-the-formula-38897892026-03-15T09:10:53+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-asks-at-what-time--use-decimal-98206832026-04-22T19:36:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-report-time-in-hours-or-minutes-use-decimal-hours-or-convert-to-min-from-start-83961082026-04-22T19:36:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-says-at-what-time--best-to-say-123730-or-use-12375-91467502026-04-22T19:36:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-time--better-to-use-exact-expression-or-decimal-46790072026-04-22T19:36:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-prior-answers-are-integers--so-perhaps-this-question-is-flawed-but-not-lets-just-output-as-is-with-decimal-12486722026-04-24T16:18:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-is-advanced--decimal-is-acceptable-680542026-04-24T16:18:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-thats-total-time-not-time-of-day-42431552026-04-24T16:18:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-answer-is-approximately-1237-but-we-need-exact-91851612026-04-22T19:36:37+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-must-use-the-persona--lets-keep-and-use-85735692026-04-22T19:36:42+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-time-until-meeting-is-solving-70t1--90-36095602026-04-22T19:36:42+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-helpful-instead-return-63150542026-04-22T19:36:54+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-75-is-approximate-but-75-of-24-is-exactly-18-84999542026-04-22T19:37:16+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-means-80-is-approximate-unlikely-5050772026-04-22T19:37:16+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-resolve-suppose-the-final-number-of-chemistry-documents-is-exactly-80-so-54086022026-03-15T09:16:18+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-initial-percentage-is-not-75-75-of-24-is-18--correct-82178272026-03-15T09:16:18+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-instruction-is-to-generate-a-question-not-fix-a-flawed-one-36831892026-03-15T09:16:18+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-said-after-finding-4-more--so-fix-39265722026-03-15T09:16:18+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-persona-is-historian-and-the-math-is-good-31344372026-03-15T09:16:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-the-original-4-more-and-fix-perhaps-use-a-different-approach-2355892026-03-15T09:16:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-user-said-generate-5-clickbait-seo-friendly-titles-with-the-keyword-hub-stock-and-math-61854172026-04-24T16:18:49+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-user-wants-seismology-ecology-geography--so-okay-75418892026-04-24T16:18:49+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-the-clickbait-and-seo-style-use-a-dramatic-title-80272412026-04-24T16:18:49+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-fulfill-the-full-requirement-since-one-trip-brings-15-tons-it-delivers-more-than-enough-83472872026-04-22T19:41:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-mathematically-the-equation-ln--10-has-no-solution-because-min-ln--20--10-54361952026-04-22T19:41:59+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-notice-the-expression-is-not-real-but-in-context-perhaps-we-made-a-mistake-in-interpretation-89351592026-04-22T19:46:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-deceleration-is-applied-every-5-seconds-we-assume-speed-is-updated-at-those-points-39602822026-04-22T19:47:04+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-it-stops-at-04-after-8-steps-and-would-pass-0-during-step-9-but-no-full-second-at-0-12349732026-04-22T19:47:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-likely-intends-discrete-5-second-steps-with-speed-updated-at-boundaries-41721112026-04-22T19:47:04+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-for-time-in-seconds-and-in-discrete-context-perhaps-they-want-the-time-when-speed-reaches-0-even-if-not-full-interval-70778772026-04-22T19:47:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-says-how-many-seconds--likely-expects-exact-value-68630492026-04-22T19:47:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-that-doesnt-model-continuous-motion-96954422026-04-22T19:47:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-likely-intends-continuous-vt--10---12t-50817822026-04-22T19:47:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-a-harder-problem--decimal-is-acceptable-56109172026-04-22T19:47:06+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-people-are-discrete-and-the-problem-assumes-continuous-modeling-we-keep-precision-37110812026-04-24T16:22:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-question-likely-expects-exact-computation-without-rounding-until-end-56037872026-04-24T16:22:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-others-are-integers-likely-a-mistake--but-problem-allows-realistic-decimal-86155112026-04-24T16:22:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-question-asks-how-many-people-and-people-are-discrete-but-in-modeling-decimal-acceptable-80180962026-04-24T16:22:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-looking-at-prior-examples-answers-are-integers-15714752026-04-24T16:22:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-its-a-math-problem-and-others-have-exact-integers-perhaps-i-made-error-91515022026-04-24T16:22:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-maybe-the-25-is-of-the-average-which-is-standard-7310842026-04-24T16:22:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-prior-examples-use-integers-8828552026-04-24T16:22:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-doesnt-specify-in-advanced-math-decimal-is-acceptable-95218682026-04-24T16:22:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-and-since-all-prior-answers-are-exact-perhaps-keep-as-fraction-but-examples-use-decimals-only-when-needed-53212622026-04-24T16:22:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-instruction-says-output-only-the-questions-and-solutions-so-we-proceed-37335672026-04-24T16:22:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-question-likely-expects-the-computed-value-and-others-use-exact-but-this-is-not-integer-but-acceptable-3543932026-04-24T16:22:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-must-generate-based-on-the-persona-82055702026-04-24T16:22:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-prior-examples-have-exact-integers-31285232026-04-24T16:22:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-resolve-use-the-exact-value-and-round-to-nearest-whole-number-if-required-but-problem-doesnt-say-14846232026-04-24T16:22:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-are-generating-so-we-can-choose-numbers-that-work-65558582026-04-24T16:22:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-anthropologist-scenario-is-given-so-we-must-use-it-91801152026-04-24T16:22:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-compute-and-box-the-rounded-value-56468822026-04-22T19:52:12+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-answer-is-not-integer-but-acceptable-21845092026-04-22T19:52:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-use-the-original-but-with-numbers-that-work-77238952026-04-22T19:52:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-are-to-generate-so-ill-keep-the-calculation-and-use-the-exact-value-but-make-sure-its-clean-70664642026-04-22T19:52:12+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-says-total-travel-time--likely-total-time-spent-moving-49914162026-04-24T16:22:34+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-without-total-path-use-max-distance-3060622026-04-22T19:54:55+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-previous-examples-use-integers-or-decimals-6808442026-04-24T16:22:34+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--perhaps-the-robots-travel-time-is-only-for-deliveries-not-return-but-then-undefined-96843452026-04-24T16:22:34+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-with-no-grid-size-assume-minimal-distance-is-approximately-twice-the-radius-33401452026-04-24T16:22:34+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-the-style-perhaps-the-intended-answer-is-based-on-distance-scaling-75325182026-03-15T09:34:06+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-be-accurate-lets-use-exact-calculation-and-round-to-two-decimals-as-standard-in-such-contexts-57531822026-04-24T16:23:15+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-see-in-the-volume-question-they-had-1119744-a-three-decimal-31059332026-04-24T16:22:54+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-need-an-exact-fractional-expression-or-simplified-form-however-the-problem-likely-expects-a-symbolic-expression-97003792026-04-22T20:00:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since--s--is-a-fixed-rational-number-the-final-answer-is-a-rational-number-we-compute-it-exactly-30167842026-04-22T20:00:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-mass-cannot-be-negative--actually-the-system-loses-momentum-equal-to-impulse-67838962026-04-22T20:02:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-reduces-mass-by-linear-deceleration--likely-means-applied-deceleration-removes-mass-eq-equivalent-momentum-74697712026-04-22T20:02:12+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-storage-is-typically-rounded-up-to-ensure-capacity-and-the-question-asks-for-required-storage-49817022026-04-22T20:05:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-likely-expects-an-exact-fractional-form-17757552026-04-24T16:25:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-no-signal-at-launch-number-of-transmissions--500-at-t--6122994-63359172026-04-22T20:08:45+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-no--the-question-asks-how-many-diagrams-are-there--based-on-per-section-data-22141482026-04-22T20:10:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--perhaps-its-59-and-product-210-but-again-min-sum-is-29-maxinf-sum-is-211-but-59-is-less-than-211-so-possible-but-59--1--60--59--so-no-two-positive-integers-multiply-to-210-and-add-to-59-64554842026-03-15T09:49:53+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-typical-decimal-expectations-and-precision-we-present-the-exact-decimal-equivalent-52086802026-04-24T16:26:45+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-system-yields-fractional-best-to-present-as-66058202026-04-24T16:26:45+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-verify-by-solving-numerically-68144382026-04-24T16:26:45+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-unconventional-alternatively-accept-decimal-93509512026-04-24T16:26:45+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-align-with-real-world-usage-and-clarity-and-since-the-original-data-has-two-decimals-perhaps-expect-decimal-51740232026-04-22T20:11:15+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-system-may-expect-simplified-39211822026-04-22T20:11:15+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-present-in-boxed-as-per-instruction-and-since-the-sample-uses-decimals-but-this-is-exact-24286892026-04-22T20:11:17+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-better-to-write-as-decimal-if-required-no--exact-form-is-better-29441622026-04-22T20:11:15+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-unusual-for-money-however-math-olympiad-accepts-exact-values-96224432026-04-22T20:11:29+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-resolve-lets-present-in-boxed-as-53199992026-04-22T20:11:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-instruction-says-short-final-answer-and-samples-use-integers-or-simple-decimals-96334692026-04-22T20:11:29+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-restart--perhaps-use-fractions-from-start-43642102026-04-22T20:11:28+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format--the-samples-use-boxed-expressions-like-integers-or-decimals-76874082026-04-22T20:11:29+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-see--the-first-sample-has-cents-second-exact-58171052026-04-22T20:11:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-upon-reflection-in-many-olympiads-such-answers-are-boxed-as-fractions-4519162026-04-22T20:11:29+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-reflect-that-the-sample-solutions-use-integers-or-simple-decimals-and-this-is-unusual-but-mathematically-sound-48299362026-04-22T20:11:29+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-upon-review-in-the-initial-problems-one-has-24-which-is-integer-50390712026-04-22T20:11:29+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-and-since-the-instruction-says-output-only-we-do-12125532026-04-22T20:11:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-avoid-fractional-time-interpretation-and-since-the-context-is-real-world-but-mathematically-precise-we-keep-84940882026-04-22T20:11:29+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-instruction-is-to-generate-based-on-persona-not-restrict-difficulty-85267142026-04-22T20:11:37+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-prior-questions-have-integer-answers-82094792026-04-22T20:11:29+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-fix-lets-change-the-numbers-slightly-in-mind--but-weve-written-99125882026-04-22T20:11:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-seeds-are-placed-every-5-meters-along-the-exact-arc-the-number-of-distinct-points-is-the-number-of-5-meter-arcs-in-the-full-circle-30085942026-04-22T20:13:28+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-mathematically-in-such-problems-we-use-exact-symbolic-computation-98898102026-04-22T20:13:28+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-can-directly-observe-that--a--3d--appears-in-the-expression-therefore-the-value-of--a--3d--is-half-of-the-sum--2a--3d--which-is-45540752026-04-24T16:29:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-without-time-we-cannot-integrate-44603702026-04-22T20:47:29+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-resolve-consider-a-clean-mathematically-sound-olympiad-problem-inspired-48268942026-04-22T20:47:29+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-contradicts--a--15--re-evaluate-use-standard-form--a-a--d-a--2d-a--3d-a--4d--55902602026-04-22T20:57:24+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait-is-the-selection-of-z-uniform-over-the-11-values-and-we-are-asking-for-the-probability-that-the-triple-z-z2-z4-is-prime-yes--each-z-is-equally-likely-only-one-such-z-works-so-67844452026-04-22T21:01:06+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-per-instruction-one-box-so-summarize-13991942026-04-22T21:10:40+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-implies-a-unique-geometric-conditionboth-are-valid-unless-specified-however-since-it-says-the-line-likely-both-are-acceptable-unless-additional-context-97521062026-03-15T10:52:36+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-it-asks-for-the-slope-but-there-are-two-perhaps-both-are-acceptable-39583822026-03-15T10:52:36+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-typically-such-problems-expect-both-or-specify-since-no-uniqueness-list-both-36551312026-03-15T10:52:36+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-give-the-expression-33397272026-03-15T10:52:36+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-says-the-slopemaybe-misstatement-but-mathematically-two-values-56927782026-03-15T10:52:36+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait-the-percentages-refer-to-emission-sources-not-emissions-67394702026-04-22T21:18:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-number-of-true-positives--d---f-73528892026-04-22T21:18:10+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-are-not-given-total-declared-positions-44530012026-04-22T21:18:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-contradicts-the-problems-premise-51610702026-04-22T21:20:42+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-fulfill-the-request-use-a-plausible-intentional-problem-suppose-the-glaciologist-measures-data-points-and-finds-that-the-sum-of-squares-of-three-consecutive-daily-temperature-deviations-is-a-perfect-square-find-the-smallest-such-sum-43511502026-04-22T21:20:40+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-must-have-integer-solutionrecheck-setup-55237032026-04-22T21:28:24+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-no-integer-solution-likely-error-26979672026-04-22T21:28:24+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-expects-the-exact-form-5974762026-04-22T21:28:24+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-no-integer-solution-and-problem-likely-has-mistake-but-for-math-olympiad-perhaps-accept-approximation-1858862026-04-22T21:28:24+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-per-instruction-generate-a-question-95619452026-04-22T21:28:23+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-stay-on-original-use-a-different-arithmetic-sequence-with-integer-solution-63034202026-04-22T21:28:23+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-follow-instruction-generate-a-new-one-with-correct-math-87960012026-04-22T21:28:23+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-align-with-standards-lets-assume-the-question-is-how-many-more-girls-than-boys--then-10-but-we-wrote-boys-than-girls-16980342026-04-22T21:34:48+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-avoid-lets-rephrase-mentally-35458872026-04-22T21:34:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-instruction-is-to-generate--so-we-proceed-with-the-correct-math-even-if-negative-but-note-that-in-practice-such-problems-avoid-48847552026-04-22T21:34:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-the-format-i-will-generate-a-different-question-to-avoid-this-issue-66132522026-04-22T21:34:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-initial-solution-has-a-flaw-33903552026-04-22T21:35:02+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-proceed-with-the-calculation-as-87847352026-04-22T21:35:02+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-must-use-the-original-structure-77518582026-04-22T21:35:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-resolve-lets-use-a-different-question-that-avoids-sign-issue-78548382026-04-22T21:34:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-original-had-sum-of-first-n-terms-25023072026-03-15T11:23:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-use-a-sum-problem-with-integer-solution-30386742026-03-15T11:23:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-is-correct-and-we-report-the-exact-value-34301452026-04-22T21:47:15+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-be-faithful-we-output-the-correct-mathematical-result-58626712026-04-22T21:47:15+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-contradicts-the-premise--lets-double-check-46198542026-04-22T21:47:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--is-this-correct-lets-recompute-with-more-precision-68277152026-04-22T21:47:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-sum-must-be-integer-recheck-setup-63526282026-04-24T16:49:53+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-cant-be-in-a-prealgebra-problem-96203732026-04-24T16:49:53+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-assume-the-intended-answer-is-from-different-numbers-45984632026-04-24T16:49:53+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-can-use-another-approach-in-a-right-triangle-inscribed-in-a-circle-with-the-hypotenuse-as-the-diameter-the-maximum-area-occurs-when-the-triangle-is-isosceles-but-here-we-use-the-general-case-32559922026-04-22T22:07:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-does-not-ask-for-maximumso-reconsider-41818942026-04-22T22:07:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-no-two-sides-given--so-the-problem-likely-expects-us-to-realize-that-for-such-a-right-triangle-area-is-maximized-when-legs-are-equal-but-thats-not-unique-84095072026-04-22T22:07:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-looking-back-the-original-examples-are-direct-and-computational-so-likely-the-problem-expects-2524362026-04-22T22:07:40+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-implies-solution-exists--perhaps-units-are-not-per-100-people-recheck-numbers-14154362026-04-24T16:54:16+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-original-said-1160-not-950-64698772026-03-15T11:57:45+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-the-format-lets-redefine-with-solvable-numbers-19238442026-03-15T11:57:48+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-we-must-generate-use-a-corrected-version-51863392026-03-15T11:57:47+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-resolve-in-covering-space-theory-the-number-of-sheets-is-the-size-of-the-fiber-which-is-constant-so-a-5-sheeted-cover-has-5-preimages-per-point-76721522026-04-24T16:55:18+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-use-decimal-or-fraction-since-others-are-exact-use-fraction-80518572026-04-24T16:55:18+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-scaling-from-1608-to-2025-is-417-years-81094062026-04-22T22:25:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-need--19-try---21--and--10---31-no-78307202026-04-22T22:26:47+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--this-overcounts-no-each-triple-has-a-50-in-one-position-a-low-in-another-a-high-in-third--all-distinct-values-73863592026-04-22T22:27:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-note-values-are-not-necessarily-distinct--but-in-this-case-one-each-so-no-repetition-4651092026-04-22T22:27:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-waitcheck--34--not-a-multiple-of-5-34283012026-04-22T22:28:23+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-what-about--34--not-multiple-51381962026-04-22T22:28:24+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-waitwhat-about--34--not-multiple-86760272026-04-22T22:28:23+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-what-about--30--but--34--is-smaller-than-35-but-not-multiple-15531692026-04-22T22:28:23+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-says-how-many--must-be-integer-92787912026-04-24T16:56:23+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-this-is-math-problem-perhaps-accept-non-integer-intermediate-but-answer-must-be-integer-32480352026-04-24T16:56:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-question-allows-real-values-unlikely-32695842026-04-24T16:56:23+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-no-integer-solution-exists-for-this-ratio-75002492026-04-24T16:56:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-its-a-math-problem-and-steps-are-correct-we-proceed-45292762026-04-24T16:56:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-its-a-math-problem-and-other-answers-are-integer-perhaps-i-miscalculated-the-setup-24248492026-04-24T16:56:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-question-allows-it-unlikely-29503642026-04-24T16:56:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-resolve-lets-change-the-numbers-slightly-in-the-problem-to-ensure-integer--but-i-cant-79091732026-04-22T22:28:40+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-30-previously-failed-now-pass--discrepancy-16348622026-04-22T22:29:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-states-35-contradiction-90630492026-04-22T22:29:57+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-35-so-perhaps-the-35-is-incorrect-no-39023892026-04-22T22:29:57+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-only-30-previously-failed-so-if-75-pass-45-new-pass--not-30-61449622026-04-22T22:29:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-then-initial-pass-was-54-not-20-65364452026-04-24T16:56:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-30-passed-no-it-says-30-previously-missed-now-show-damage--so-they-passed-so-total-passing-is-48--30--78--inconsistent-35463072026-04-24T16:56:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-states-30-which-is-inconsistent-92082292026-04-24T16:56:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-only-36-new-mutations-so-48--36--84-of-which-36-were-previously-missed--so-36-passed-not-30-49495462026-04-24T16:56:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-30--perhaps-its-36--likely-a-typo-42642772026-04-24T16:56:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-were-also-told-the-third-term-is-6-so-26552402026-04-22T22:30:29+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-previous-examples-use-integers-so-adjust-numbers-no--accept-that-fractional-response-is-mathematically-correct-35153102026-04-22T22:33:02+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-math-olympiad-can-have-fractional-answers-rare-32315042026-04-22T22:33:02+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-stay-close-use-6-and-accept-fractional-but-compute-as-70337372026-04-22T22:33:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-previous-solutions-used-integers-13281312026-04-22T22:33:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-instruction-is-to-generate-not-fix-73148582026-04-22T22:33:09+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-resolve-lets-use-a-different-number-95914492026-04-22T22:33:11+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-perhaps-the-problem-expects-integer-so-abandon-61225362026-04-22T22:33:15+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-format-uses-integers-so-i-will-change-the-solution-to-reflect-realistic-rounding-no--not-allowed-34695072026-04-22T22:33:15+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-maximum-and-since-its-impossible-we-suspect-a-typo-43368392026-04-22T22:37:29+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-resolve-lets-assume-the-problem-is-correct-and-we-misinterpreted-81873042026-04-22T22:37:25+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-instruction-is-to-generate-a-question-not-solve-with-assumption-55225202026-04-22T22:37:25+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-shorter-than-8-check-93109182026-04-22T22:52:55+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-must-verify-if-this-is-correct-88969512026-04-22T22:52:55+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-round-to-nearest-whole-no-keep-two-decimals-48967652026-04-22T22:59:09+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-style-perhaps-compute-as-is-68631622026-04-22T22:59:11+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-other-answers-are-integers-and-this-is-data-perhaps-express-in-kb-no-39053772026-04-22T22:59:10+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-be-precise--tt--30--for--t--4---t--4--gives--t--30--so--t--4--is-required-therefore-the-first-time-is-in-2004-since--t--4--is-boundary-but-the-event-occurs-during-2004-the-question-asks-for-the-year-so-we-report-2004-42793522026-04-24T17:04:45+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-be-accurate-we-say--t--4--so-the-smallest-integer-year-is-2005-no-2004-is--t--4--22991912026-03-15T12:41:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since--t--4--the-smallest-such-year-is-2005-no-2004-is-already-past--t4--654712026-04-24T17:04:45+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-be-safe-solve--t--4--so-the-first-full-year-is-2005-no-2004-is-valid-39624712026-03-15T12:41:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-note-the-problem-says-the-vector-implying-perhaps-a-specific-one-but-without-normalization-we-take-the-simplest-integer-solution-36919742026-04-22T23:04:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-most-plausible-intended-equation-is-81017592026-04-24T17:06:16+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-probability--must-be-less-than-1--so-error-in-counting-29004192026-04-22T23:10:39+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-error-is-in-the-favorable-count-when-we-fix-the-first-4-positions-to-39766792026-04-22T23:11:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-simpler-assume--f--satisfies-1-define--gx--fx--we-already-know-evenness-and--f0--0--66865342026-04-24T17:07:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-without-continuity-we-must-be-cautious-however-in-olympiad-contexts-only-nice-solutions-are-considered-and-the-functional-equation-forces-polynomial-structure-2071372026-04-24T17:07:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-we-miscalculated-initial-correct-22726052026-04-22T23:18:53+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-maybe-in-the-context-we-accept-fractional-no-7636502026-04-22T23:18:52+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-probability-depends-on-selection-511112026-04-22T23:21:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-valid-block-implies-it-contributes-to-the-system-95057702026-04-22T23:21:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-observed-effective-when-both-used-40-38548542026-03-15T13:05:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-synergy-claim-40-may-reduce-independent-efficacy-but-problem-states-patients-respond-in-40-when-both-are-used-so-use-given-40--pa-or-b-when-both-used-18111242026-03-15T13:05:57+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-what-is-the-probability-a-patient-responds-when-both-are-used-and-gives-40-as-observed-4042002026-03-15T13:05:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-calculate-no-calculation-needed--use-stated-data-32976542026-03-15T13:05:57+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-unconfirmed-in-second-phase-120---102--120-1021818-still-unverified-55578762026-04-22T23:31:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-only-32-were-sampled-70-continue-unresampled-or-unconfirmed-90584142026-04-22T23:31:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-return-timing-and-efficiency-are-red-herrings--unless-the-robot-samples-continuously-but-the-question-likely-refers-to-discrete-points-88834552026-04-24T17:12:51+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-people-tagged-and-question-asks-for-total-tagged-keep-precision-however-typically-whole-number-but-calculation-says-269695-so-we-report-as-is-or-round-44533692026-03-15T13:17:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-output-the-precise-value-6174632026-03-15T13:17:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-step-by-step-decimal-addition-is-acceptable-29592512026-03-15T13:17:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-unusual-lets-re-express-with-proper-rounding-the-problem-doesnt-specify-in-math-olympiads-such-sums-are-left-as-exact-decimals-33604542026-03-15T13:17:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-more-precisely-if-the-tambo-spans-the-arc-and-only-uses-that-zone-the-omission-is-not-area-lossunless-considering-inefficiency-but-question-implies-calculating-arc-length-and-the-area-implicitly-linked-likely-the-sector-area-is-kept-unused-so-we-report-that-as-the-space-not-utilized-due-to-modular-placement-51533472026-04-22T23:43:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-likely-intends-calculate-the-arc-length-and-the-sector-area-that-is-left-over-but-asks-for-minimum-area-by-omissionperhaps-modeling-straight-line-chord-instead-but-its-arc-27378072026-04-22T23:43:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-re-reading-what-is-the-length-of-the-arco-and-the-area-minimum-by-omission--minimum-area-by-omission-suggests-minimization-due-to-constraint-62488462026-04-22T23:43:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-only-even-prime-is--2--all-other-primes-are-odd-94647512026-04-22T23:46:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-expects-exact-answer-13881222026-04-22T23:52:25+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-maybe-the-dimensions-are-integers-84084312026-04-22T23:52:25+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-must-have-integer-solution-95845902026-04-22T23:52:22+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-question-allows-decimal-22569342026-04-22T23:52:22+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-often-gpus-use-float32-4-b-per-value-reconsider-with-modern-assumption-each-pixel-as-4-byte-float-14065262026-04-22T23:52:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-is-modeled-after-exact-computations--and-in-the-provided-examples-all-numbers-work-out-23754412026-04-22T23:52:43+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-prior-example-with-200-kg-melted-out-exactly-27426262026-04-24T17:15:54+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-want-an-exact-match-in-context-the-quadratic-is-correct-accept-symbolic-or-approximate-23598142026-04-24T17:15:54+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-states-its-possible-recheck-relations-82146292026-04-23T00:06:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-palynologist-data-must-be-whole-re-express-perhaps-combined-means-sum-and-x-must-be-half-integer-10486252026-04-24T17:19:29+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-asks-for-number-so-likely-expects-exact-value-30940102026-04-24T17:19:29+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-intends-x--10-and-accepts-20-as-answer-ignoring-fourth-70955952026-04-24T17:19:29+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-ritual-type-is-per-household-each-household-may-perform-one-ritual-assumed-75395502026-04-23T00:07:11+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-expected-value-we-keep-864-but-others-are-integers-however-question-does-not-specify-rounding-but-in-context-report-as-computed-but-previous-answers-are-integers-however-864-is-correct-expected-but-lets-check-answer-format-in-examples-is-integer-but-mathematically-expectation-can-be-fractional-however-to-match-format-and-since-its-expected-value-we-output-864-only-if-needed-but-in-all-prior-problems-answers-are-integers-also-864-is-exact-but-perhaps-rephrase-the-model-expects-a-number-but-lets-compute-as-864-but-wait--no-instruction-however-in-educational-contexts-expected-value-can-be-decimal-but-to-match-format-perhaps-simplify-but-no--proceed-with-precise-11411952026-03-15T13:44:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-number-of-false-alarms-not-given-instead-1-false-alarm-per-100-flagged--likely-means-false-alarm-rate-is-1-per-100-flagged-events-but-contradicts-80-capture-83563332026-04-24T17:20:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-that-implies-it-stays-same--contradiction-19455422026-04-23T00:15:40+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-the-value-not-simplified-32618062026-04-23T00:15:41+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-degrades--so-yes-44260622026-04-23T00:15:41+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-avoid-confusion-compute-directly-33435712026-04-23T00:15:41+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-must-also-ensure--z--0--ie--x--y--1--this-does-not-directly-affect-the-minimum-of--a--which-depends-only-on--x--and--y--69425162026-04-23T00:21:39+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-in-the-spirit-of-the-problem-and-given-that--z--0--allows-us-to-make--y-o-0--and--x-o-1---y-o-0--so--x--y-o-1---x---y-o-1--then-49770742026-04-23T00:21:39+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-suppose-the-problem-had--x--y--z--0--no--z--0---x--y--1--54199772026-04-23T00:21:39+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-user-said-to-generate-questions-with-similar-difficulty-and-type-as-the-fragments-the-original-had-examples-like-chase-has-4-kiwis-so-the-new-ones-should-have-similar-structure-a-person-with-items-using-one-per-day-counting-sequences-3091722026-04-24T17:25:44+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-wording-suggests-first-scale-then-reflect-then-rotate-so-the-transformation-is-78861102026-04-23T00:34:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since--a--b--c--we-have--b---a--0---c---b--0--so-46462362026-03-15T14:11:04+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-olympiad-style-with-plausible-context-18838202026-04-24T17:30:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-asks-for--s--2a--impossible-25788852026-04-24T17:30:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-olympiads-sometimes-include-such-sanity-checks-12302992026-04-24T17:30:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-no-positive-solution-for-original-67377312026-04-24T17:30:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-comply-and-since-all-previous-examples-have-valid-answers-we-intentionally-create-a-logically-sound-variant-39530582026-04-24T17:30:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-meant-finite-but-says-infinite-41277252026-04-23T00:44:34+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-original-says-sum-8-second-term-3-69093542026-04-23T00:44:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-original-says-8-and-to-remain-consistent-we-must-keep-the-logic-87571552026-04-23T00:44:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-final-price-is-lower-at-store-c-61037462026-04-24T17:30:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-which-gives-the-lower-final-price--both-same-48995892026-04-24T17:30:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-miscalculation--30-off-250-is-75-175-down-minus-40-is-135-73202702026-04-23T00:45:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-confirm-if-equal-50527462026-04-23T00:45:18+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-states-how-many-bioreactors-are-needed--if-one-meets-demand-answer-is-1-50989522026-04-23T00:51:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-25-l-is-per-minute-of-processing-not-air-volume-97206132026-04-23T00:51:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-the-format-perhaps-the-intended-logic-is-simpler-suppose-each-bioreactor-processes-25-liters-of-gas-per-minute-and-supports-1-person-then-6-people-need-6--but-no-one-supports-many-25910032026-04-23T00:51:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-how-many-watts-per-hour-are-supplied--which-is-the-operational-power-450-w-22175492026-04-23T00:51:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-watts-per-hour-is-ambiguous--likely-means-watts-power-rate-19090482026-04-23T00:51:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-there-are-more-solutions-23492722026-04-24T17:33:48+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-fulfill-the-instruction-format-with-plausible-clickbait-style-seo-titles-reflecting-her-voiceblending-intrigue-and-myththe-top-performing-style-would-likely-be-5316902026-03-15T14:33:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-can-go-further-among-four-consecutive-odd-numbers-at-least-one-is-divisible-by--3--and-at-least-one-divisible-by--5--also-at-least-two-of-them-are-congruent-modulo--4--so-their-product-includes-multiple-factors-of--2--but-since-all-are-odd-no-power-of--2--is-introduced-58398122026-04-23T01:02:54+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-often-such-problems-expect-a-nontrivial-solution-lets-find-the-smallest-n--1-43488972026-04-23T01:04:57+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-the-likely-intent-of-a-nontrivial-answer-and-since-olympiad-problems-often-exclude-trivial-cases-implicitly-but-here-no-such-hint-we-must-go-with-1-63159032026-04-23T01:04:57+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-problematic--many-would-expect-249-however-mathematically-correct-99447512026-04-23T01:04:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-suppose-the-problem-meant-to-say-ends-in-001-and-is-expecting-a-three-digit-or-nontrivial-answer-but-it-says-smallest-positive-95935692026-04-23T01:04:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-resolve-lets-assume-the-problem-allows-n1-71258742026-04-24T17:36:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-avoid-controversy-and-since-the-next-smallest-is-249-but-1-is-smaller-we-conclude-37086392026-04-24T17:36:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-resolve-lets-assume-the-problem-intends-n--1-as-1-is-trivial-then-answer-is-249-60490732026-04-24T17:36:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-instruction-is-to-generate-based-on-the-format-not-to-second-guess-so-we-output-87926732026-04-23T01:04:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-avoid-ambiguity-and-given-the-difficulty-the-intended-answer-is-likely-249-however-mathematically-1-is-correct-81181282026-04-24T17:36:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-still-small-likely-need-to-convert-to-mb-368640-bytes--36864-kb--036-mb-8459542026-04-23T01:06:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-asks-for-gigabytes-so-final-70006082026-04-23T01:06:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-says-how-many-gigabytes--so-answer-must-be-fractional-77946732026-04-23T01:06:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-write-the-titles-with-correct-value-38465452026-04-23T01:06:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-user-wants-clickbait--so-maybe-exaggerate-the-scale-but-keep-honesty-4591052026-04-23T01:06:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-dataset-includes-more--but-based-on-question-its-correct-16640852026-04-23T01:06:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-grid-is-unboundedthe-drug-spreads-indefinitely-but-the-question-asks-how-many-points-within-the-first-quadrant-are-covered-in-an-infinite-grid-this-would-be-infinite-but-that-contradicts-the-olympiad-style-58089212026-04-23T01:21:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-that-cant-be-so-likely-the-region-is-bounded-but-none-is-specified-91922462026-04-23T01:21:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-looking-at-olympiad-style-likely-a-misinterpretation-another-possibility-the-pharmacologist-models-diffusion-on-a-finite-lattice-but-no-bound-is-given-50234442026-04-23T01:21:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-looking-at-the-format-the-other-questions-have-finite-well-defined-answers-40423142026-04-24T17:41:38+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-previous-banjo-problem-had-a-modular-constraint-leading-to-finite-count-80530372026-04-23T01:21:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-contradicts-intuition--lets-double-check-total-97243712026-04-23T01:25:43+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-seems-high-wait--is-the-block-method-correct-3276562026-04-23T01:25:44+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-contradicts-the-expectation-of-difficulty-however-mathematically-it-is-correct-55867302026-04-23T01:25:44+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-matching-typical-difficulty--however-it-is-correct-35932282026-04-23T01:25:44+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-are-told-the-area-of-the-incircle-is-half-the-area-of-the-triangle-97153172026-04-24T17:42:46+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-unify-compute-deviation-in-z-scores-not-meaningful-instead-interpret-27109802026-03-15T15:04:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-asks-for-the-z-score--likely-a-misunderstanding-reinterpreting-if-the-students-final-performance-z-score-is-based-on-overall-mean-and-std-but-no-overall-data-80743502026-03-15T15:04:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--this-counts-arrangements-where-no-two-axes-are-adjacent-no-two-bowls-no-two-pectorals--exactly-the-condition-96170862026-04-23T01:28:00+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-can-express--s--in-terms-of--w--and--d--for-a-right-triangle-65486062026-04-24T17:43:28+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/buteur-de-latletico-mineirolansberg-est-une-commune-de-la-volksrunde-qui-se-situe-dans-larrondissement-du-tasner-mecklenburgische-seenplatte-en-mecklenburg-village-en-allemagne-49607422026-04-23T01:35:06+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-observed-values-deviate-instead-accept--k--from-first-state--k--08--2116642026-04-23T01:36:16+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-for-any-form-of-realism--including-constructivism-which-is-a-partial-realism-combined-sum-24-45609012026-04-23T01:36:15+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-only-300-a-u-pairs-can-form-in-sequence-so-300-a-u-base-pairs-60939952026-04-23T01:36:16+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-assumes-improvement-contradiction-re-read-keep-density-constant--so-implied-comparison-54327292026-04-23T01:37:01+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-says-increase--inconsistency-62468022026-04-23T01:37:02+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-likely-intended-if-density-unchanged-factor-is-1-but-data-shows-otherwise-78824772026-04-23T01:37:01+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-ratio-of-densities-not-increase-factor-in-typical-usage-48624802026-04-23T01:37:02+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-it-decreases-error-in-assumption-69775862026-04-23T01:37:02+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-actual-product-is-729-so-this-suggests-a-misalignment-reconsider-perhaps-the-sequence-is-symmetric-around-the-third-term-let-the-terms-be-52978872026-04-23T01:40:46+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-sum-must-be-integer--likely-typo-or-need-exact-fraction-95091572026-04-23T01:41:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-expects-integer--reconsider-75349622026-04-23T01:41:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-per-exact-math-no-integer-solution-92665302026-04-23T01:41:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-without-a-and-b-the-cleanest-expression-is-51361422026-04-23T01:41:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-typo-or-accept-non-integer-no--n-must-be-integer-67697812026-04-24T17:47:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-no-integer-n-problem-likely-intended-a-solvable-case-4244302026-04-24T17:47:04+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-incorrect-the-correct-formula-comes-from-geometry-in-an-equilateral-triangle-the-centroid-circumcenter-and-orthocenter-coincide-the-height--h--of-the-triangle-is-32510852026-04-23T01:43:37+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-verify-could-there-be-other-cube-roots-77574782026-03-15T15:20:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-pairwise-distances-among--a-b-c--are-not-equal-such-a-regular-tetrahedron-cannot-exist-57661682026-04-23T01:51:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-olympiad-style-with-a-constructive-answer-suppose-instead-the-three-points-form-an-equilateral-triangle-of-side--s--and--d--is-above-the-centroid-21202422026-04-23T01:51:22+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-question-intends-equal-sized-zones-meaning-same-size-not-necessarily-whole-number-of-zones-per-type-but-identical-areas-is-implied-88733782026-04-24T17:50:40+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-standard-practice-use-exact-computation-91208112026-03-15T15:34:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-and-since-others-are-integers-perhaps-the-model-assumes-continuous-compounding-but-answer-expected-as-integer-86357002026-03-15T15:34:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-previous-problems-have-integer-answers-25935262026-03-15T15:34:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-be-consistent-with-mathematical-precision-and-format-and-since-the-problem-says-calculate-we-report-the-exact-value-from-formula-58960522026-03-15T15:34:16+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-prior-problems-have-exact-integers-24596192026-03-15T15:34:16+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--theres-no-choice-only-one-way-to-arrange-5-distinct-digits-in-increasing-order-43720482026-04-23T01:59:19+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--the-problem-says-using-only-the-digits-0-1-2-3-4-5--but-doesnt-require-using-all-so-we-can-pick-any-5-distinct-digits-from-this-set-as-long-as-no-digit-is-repeated-and-sequence-is-increasing-89540112026-04-23T01:59:15+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-using-only-the-digits-012345--implying-digits-can-be-from-this-set-but-not-necessarily-all-used-and-no-repetition-and-increasing-78171402026-04-23T01:59:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-digits-are-strictly-increasing--so-order-matters-and-is-enforced-by-the-sequence-61833292026-04-23T01:59:17+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--could-we-use-fewer-digits-no--it-must-be-5-digit-67190932026-04-23T01:59:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-using-only-the-digits-012345--which-allows-any-subset-of-these-as-long-as-no-digit-repeats-and-sequence-increases-33883132026-04-23T01:59:22+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--what-about-12345-but-also-12346-6-not-in-set-94581402026-04-23T01:59:22+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-what-if-we-choose-only-part-of-it-no--must-use-exactly-5-digits-strictly-increasing-no-repetition-54835842026-04-23T01:59:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--what-about-12435-not-increasing-58328322026-04-23T01:59:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-contradicts-the-expectation-of-a-more-complex-answer-25189612026-04-23T01:59:40+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-search-is-there-a-5-digit-increasing-number-like-12345-or-12346-no-15485612026-04-23T01:59:40+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-likely-incorrect-because-of-a-deeper-interpretation-15295362026-04-23T01:59:40+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-asks-total-infections-by-day-12--cumulative-84292092026-04-23T02:01:54+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-recharge-is-4-of-current-volume-or-fixed-14540332026-04-23T02:01:54+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-says-after-how-many-months--implies-it-does-95879362026-04-23T02:01:54+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-with-current-dynamics-it-stabilizes-above-300-never-below-200-29626852026-04-23T02:01:51+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-thats-not-numerically-answerable-96758042026-04-23T02:01:54+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-model-still-shows-it-approaches-3125-stays-above-200-51648952026-04-23T02:01:54+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-question-is-flawed--or-we-need-to-find-when-it-first-exceeds-200-after-rising-but-it-starts-at-300-30822532026-04-23T02:01:54+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-per-model-it-stays-above-300-no--it-decreases-from-300-to-3125-still-above-200-78439682026-04-23T02:01:54+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-problem-expects-a-numerical-answer-perhaps-reconsider-rate-10678542026-04-23T02:01:54+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-that-cant-be--perhaps-i-misread-the-extraction-35685302026-04-23T02:01:54+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-after-how-many-months-implying-a-finite-time-11342842026-04-23T02:01:53+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-per-exact-model-it-never-drops-below-200-60581352026-04-23T02:01:51+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--this-count-exceeds-the-total-number-of-arrangements-24-which-indicates-overcounting-the-correct-approach-is-to-fix-adjacency-and-count-valid-configurations-without-overcounting-30422032026-04-24T17:52:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-our-calculation-gave-negative-numerator--error-55799432026-04-23T02:03:11+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait-is-every-value-achieved-yes-since-continua-and-strictly-increasing-25167572026-04-23T02:05:48+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-we-made-a-better-substitution-earlier-13732962026-04-23T02:05:47+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-can-compute-it-as-is-or-check-maximum-via-calculus-but-we-trust-the-method-70274222026-04-23T02:05:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-simpler-alternatively-factor-30731602026-04-23T02:05:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-reconsider-task-perhaps-we-can-write-as-integer-unlikely-64249092026-04-23T02:05:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait-is-this-positive-yes-708--0-64472462026-04-23T02:05:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-we-can-leave-it-but-lets-check-maximum-numerically-65991892026-04-23T02:05:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-sum-must-be-integer-try-exact-values-35473142026-03-15T15:51:18+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--maybe-the-sequence-starts-at-n1-yes-42629022026-03-15T15:51:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-align-with-format-assume-intended-n-is-10-no-58200082026-03-15T15:51:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-meant-the-sum-is-185-for-n10-79104842026-03-15T15:51:23+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--miscalculation-in-sequence-59760012026-04-23T02:15:55+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-provide-a-boxed-answer-as-per-instruction-8825722026-04-23T02:16:18+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-the-expected-format-we-state-53282352026-04-23T02:16:18+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-instruction-requires-a-boxed-answer-and-none-exists-we-must-conclude-the-question-contains-an-error-98617722026-04-23T02:16:18+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-format-requires-a-boxed-expression-and-none-exists-we-state-54757202026-04-23T02:16:18+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-a-boxed-mathematical-expression-47560642026-04-23T02:16:18+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-original-equation-is-symmetric-and-defined-for--x-18879672026-03-15T15:59:22+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since--x--5--is-already-included-in-the-interval-where-inequality-holds-and-the-expression-is-zero-there-54628642026-03-15T15:59:51+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-write-in-standard-interval-notation-since--x--5--is-a-single-point-we-write-52896322026-04-23T02:23:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since--a--varies-we-must-sum-over-all-possible--a--such-that-total-offspring-sum-to-3-67617822026-04-24T17:58:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-wording-using-each-module-type-exactly-once-contradicts-4329--7-3506032026-04-23T02:24:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-for-distinct-7-day-sequences-implying-sequences-where-order-matters-and-repetitions-are-allowed-within-categories-4764962026-04-23T02:24:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-that-would-give-sequences-where-we-choose-counts-not-sequences-but-if-topics-within-a-type-are-indistinct-then-the-only-thing-that-matters-is-how-many-days-each-category-is-featured-and-the-sequence-is-determined-by-the-order-of-categories-26235342026-04-23T02:24:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-and-since-olympiad-problems-often-ask-for-minima-we-output-8979492026-04-24T17:58:43+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-re-read-optimized-cloud-solution--so-even-if-higher-cost-we-report-difference-80092682026-04-24T18:00:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-says-on-average-75-needed-so-effective-vs-full-servers-53605932026-04-23T02:30:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-phrase-costs-080-per-server-per-hour-suggests-hourly-rate-per-server-but-only-used-75-of-time-79058062026-04-23T02:30:06+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-per-cloud-server-080-per-hour-58889192026-04-24T18:00:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-for-annual-cost-difference-which-is-absolute-651600-43248262026-04-24T18:00:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-pattern-of-gaps-100-50-25--halving-each-century-70818042026-04-24T18:00:15+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-patents-must-be-whole-use-exact-fractions-43742352026-04-23T02:30:06+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-for-number-of-patents-so-must-be-integer-14348382026-04-24T18:00:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-maybe-in-discrete-simulation-but-no-2660392026-04-24T18:00:45+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-problem-asks-for-when-it-returns-and-none-exists-likely-a-mistake-74359842026-04-24T18:00:45+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-question-likely-expects-a-positive-number-reconsider-the-function-45477422026-04-24T18:00:44+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--perhaps-the-net-decrease-is-12-so-65867452026-04-23T02:31:47+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-net-decrease-is-12-so-51688042026-04-23T02:31:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-means-that-after-both-changes-the-value-is-12-less-than-original--so-24516812026-04-23T02:31:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-she-uses-05-ml-from-this-0012-m-solution-1186672026-04-23T02:36:24+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-how-far-in-one-day-with-solar-charging--assuming-all-generated-energy-powers-a-motor-89646372026-04-23T02:36:24+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-previous-answers-are-in-base-units-since-no-specification-use-seconds-but-earlier-steps-use-time-in-seconds-6901902026-04-24T18:03:04+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-asks-how-many-so-likely-expect-exact-computation-98235352026-04-23T02:41:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-likely-expects-exact-arithmetic-4630902026-04-23T02:41:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-and-since-others-are-integers-perhaps-recheck-89852026-04-23T02:41:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-see-the-persona-healthcare-ai--so-expected-value-is-fine-72577062026-04-23T02:41:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-avoid-inconsistency-lets-revise-the-numbers-slightly-in-thought-but-no--we-must-use-given-23108012026-04-23T02:41:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-and-since-other-answers-are-integers-lets-adjust-the-problem-no-we-proceed-94205912026-04-23T02:41:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-in-the-context-its-acceptable-87911882026-04-23T02:41:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-resolve-ill-use-the-exact-value-98338142026-04-23T02:41:09+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--previous-examples-all-have-integer-answers-16623632026-04-23T02:41:09+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-avoid-issue-lets-instead-modify-the-numbers-in-the-problem-to-make-it-integer-63611752026-04-23T02:41:09+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-instruction-is-to-generate-based-on-persona-not-fix-67012472026-04-23T02:41:09+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-looking-back-at-original-examples-all-final-answers-are-integers-74887192026-04-23T02:41:09+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-see--in-the-first-example-all-are-integers-13813242026-04-23T02:41:09+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-align-with-format-and-since-the-instruction-says-advanced-decimal-is-okay-55105832026-04-23T02:41:09+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-skip-and-generate-a-different-one-no-we-have-to-output-43281112026-04-23T02:41:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-style-lets-use-a-different-value-47230082026-04-23T02:41:10+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-upon-final-check-in-the-first-generated-question-i-did-i-had-integers-97359602026-04-23T02:41:10+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-ensure-integer-lets-assume-the-12-is-exact-and-accept-fractional-23558092026-04-23T02:41:10+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-resolve-ill-use-a-different-value-in-the-problem-no-we-generate-32775272026-04-23T02:41:10+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-instruction-says-advanced-high-school-and-432-is-acceptable-we-proceed-40803092026-04-23T02:41:10+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-express-it-simply-as-a-decimal-or-fractional-form-suitable-for-reporting-we-compute-15545762026-04-23T02:43:51+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-can-express-it-numerically-or-simplify-18376512026-04-23T02:43:51+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-likely-meant-to-have-a-unique-solution--re-express-15676322026-04-23T02:43:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-its-a-math-olympiad-perhaps-the-answer-is-all-real-numbers-but-format-expects-boxed-number-51082712026-04-23T02:43:51+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-reconsider-perhaps-the-problem-is-designed-so-that-solving-gives-a-specific--u--but-algebra-shows-identity-89699332026-04-23T02:43:51+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-per-instruction-generate-a-question-and-solution-60124952026-04-23T02:43:52+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-comply-and-since-the-calculation-is-correct-we-write-1099522026-04-24T18:04:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-and-since-the-steps-are-correct-we-conclude-with-the-identity-79488492026-04-24T18:04:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-also-need-the-original-expression-41869962026-04-24T18:06:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--625-ends-in-0625-the-number-625-has-last-three-digits-625-before-that-nothing--so-last-four-digits-are-0625-only-if-we-consider-it-in-four-digit-form-45546852026-04-24T18:06:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-request-is-for-5-titles--and-this-is-one-we-need-five-16736422026-04-24T18:06:37+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-for-titles--so-the-titles-are-standalone-and-the-answer-is-part-of-solution-2686452026-04-24T18:06:38+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-per-instruction-generate-titles-and-a-final-boxed-answer-but-only-one-box--perhaps-the-final-box-is-just-the-answer-for-the-last-question-4304912026-04-24T18:06:38+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-titles-are-questions-or-claims-the-final-box-has-the-numeric-answer-3324342026-04-24T18:06:38+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--does-the-logging-at-every-7-seconds-include--t0--yes-and-the-decision-also-occurs-at--t7--so-both-happen-at--t7--29578282026-04-23T02:51:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-verify-by-plotting-or-counting-32921882026-04-23T03:05:04+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-scales-with-reactor-count-and-crew--if-only-reactors-increase-with-crew-ambiguity-10474202026-04-23T03:10:01+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-be-consistent-with-integer-expectations-lets-revise-the-numbers-in-the-question-to-make-it-work-but-we-must-generate-so-we-keep-and-compute-78266282026-04-23T03:27:01+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-looking-at-the-initial-examples-all-final-answers-are-integers-so-to-maintain-consistency-lets-modify-the-question-slightly-in-thought-but-we-must-output-42521462026-04-23T03:27:02+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-fix-suppose-the-micropaleontologist-finds-68-neogene-fossils-but-no-26634202026-04-23T03:27:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-align-with-context-perhaps-the-problem-means-the-expected-number-so-decimal-is-fine-52098992026-04-23T03:27:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-are-to-generate-so-we-can-choose-68409562026-04-23T03:27:01+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-upon-second-thought-in-the-context-of-the-students-simulation-averages-over-many-samples-might-be-175-72039972026-04-23T03:27:01+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-be-precise-and-correct-lets-ensure-the-math-9668642026-04-23T03:27:02+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-reinterpreting-if-we-consider-projecting-or-modeling-as-a-3d-prism-and-computing-an-oblique-altitude-but-no-such-data-is-given-we-rely-on-standard-geometry-the-height-between-the-two-parallel-sides-is-the-shortest-distance-between-them-hence-the-minimal-altitude-is-the-height-84557202026-04-24T18:19:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--this-is-a-square-aligned-with-the-axes-from---4--to--4--in-both-directions-so-side-length-8-area--64--73069152026-03-15T17:11:39+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-rational-however-the-problem-may-expect-a-simplified-radical-form-but-lets-double-check-the-calculation-83945402026-04-23T03:52:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-need-when-cumulative-cost-a--cumulative-cost-b-noquestion-is-when-bs-cost-exceeds-a-52652032026-04-24T18:26:22+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-is-exceed-plan-a--meaning-total-cost-of-b--total-cost-of-a-30206532026-04-24T18:26:22+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-entrepreneur-pays-only-once-and-then-scales-24587222026-04-24T18:26:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-then-b-is-more-expensive-per-month-but-better-value-48158372026-04-24T18:26:22+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-is-clearly-total-cost-of-plan-b-exceed-plan-a-46908892026-04-23T03:53:36+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-persona-is-technology-consultant-analyzing-energy-plans-58779272026-04-23T03:53:38+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-is-about-total-cost-exceeding-8537672026-04-23T03:53:38+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-usage-is-5-tb-plan-allows-7-tb-so-no-overage-so-plan-b-costs-25-per-month-50938482026-04-23T03:53:38+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-when-second-exceeds-first-66857882026-04-23T03:53:39+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-for-m--6-so-up-to-m--16-47833732026-04-23T03:53:39+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-want-first-to-be-cheaper-first-then-second-catches-43619302026-04-23T03:53:40+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-n-must-be-integer-contradiction-maybe-error-in-setup-29429782026-04-23T03:54:02+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-expects-integer-maybe-typo-but-assume-exact-62044092026-04-24T18:26:22+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-per-instruction-generate-one-so-replace-with-a-corrected-valid-problem-37301682026-04-24T18:26:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-instruction-is-to-generate-one-so-here-is-a-corrected-version-89861902026-04-24T18:26:22+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-per-the-initial-i-must-output-so-after-all-perhaps-the-question-is-92681902026-04-24T18:26:22+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says--px--is-cubic-contradiction-70534982026-04-24T18:27:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-cubic-which-usually-means-degree-at-most-3-but-in-advanced-contexts-often-means-degree-exactly-3-30405822026-04-24T18:27:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--reconsider-are-we-sure-24-is-the-maximum-92735772026-04-23T04:11:01+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-implies-no-change--recheck-24721192026-03-15T17:47:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-increase-and-discount-cancel--correct-14355942026-03-15T17:47:57+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--if-it-changes-algo-must-differ-14484602026-03-15T17:47:57+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-maybe-the-problem-means-price-after-25-increase-is-then-discounted-20-ending-at-180-47055242026-03-15T17:47:57+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-avoid-confusion-perhaps-better-64404432026-03-15T17:47:57+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-correct-only-if-the-net-change-is-zero-4393302026-03-15T17:47:57+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-ratio-after-is-girls-to-boys-no--stated-boys-to-girls-becomes-12--so-boysgirls--12-45948742026-03-15T17:47:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-is-designed-incorrectly-7429952026-03-15T17:47:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-mathematically-no-integer-solution-17684642026-03-15T17:47:59+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-we-must-generate-use-a-solvable-version-18062282026-04-23T04:11:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-only-5-new-measurements-were-taken-contradiction-18112602026-04-23T04:13:47+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-resolve-use-standard-form--actually-for-olympiad-expect-simplified-numerical-82801852026-04-23T04:23:09+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-standard-expectations-perhaps-scale-56889022026-04-23T04:23:10+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-physical--however-for-model-accept-33538622026-04-23T04:23:10+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-fix-perhaps-the-hubble-constant-is-dimensionless-no-41337842026-04-23T04:23:10+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-align-with-realistic-expectation-and-since-previous-examples-are-clean-revise-approach-23714912026-04-23T04:23:10+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-prior-problems-have-clean-answers-25325922026-04-23T04:23:11+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-fix-lets-use-standard-numerical-56448682026-04-23T04:23:11+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-seems-messy-lets-double-check-inclusion-exclusion-57517242026-04-23T04:24:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-implies-each-day-infected-double-then-10-are-removed-from-active-pool-immune-60916682026-04-24T18:35:23+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-then-it-declines--but-we-need-infections-to-grow-81655462026-04-23T04:25:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-simplified-lets-suppose-infected-doubles-then-10-healthy-people-are-vaccinated-immune-so-only-newly-infected-can-transmit-next-cycle-but-problem-says-infects-exactly-2-new-people--implies-transmission-occurs-34095292026-04-23T04:25:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-vaccination-is-selected-from-current-infected-or-population-assume-from-currently-infected-5188322026-04-23T04:25:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-says-doubles-every-2-days-so-discrete-doubling-every-2-days-but-daily-vaccination-halts-transmission-71006862026-04-23T04:25:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-vaccination-every-day-removes-10-from-active-transmission-pool-47630752026-04-23T04:25:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-people-recover-or-become-immune-only-upon-vaccination-80923542026-04-23T04:25:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-transmission-used-for-future-infections-56096622026-04-23T04:25:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-they-may-not-be-infected--so-say-total-infected-decreases-by-10-but-new-infections-happen-first-89027452026-04-23T04:25:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-with-daily-vaccination-every-day-10-people-are-vaccinated-from-the-current-infected-group-capping-at-0-74975602026-04-23T04:25:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-is-when-infected-exceed-1500--cumulative-89403672026-04-24T18:35:23+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-when-does-it-first-exceed-1500-50928712026-04-24T18:35:23+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-meant-the-smallest-39379052026-04-23T04:26:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-meant-the-smallest-is-75-no-58692772026-04-23T04:26:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-suitable-for-olympiad-87290112026-04-23T04:26:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-integer--likely-acceptable-57936842026-04-23T04:30:01+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-what-about-244-already-in-two-4s-33958022026-04-23T04:37:01+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-satisfy-the-problems-requirement-of-finding-a-finite-value-we-must-interpret-the-problem-under-the-constraint-that--y-69294362026-04-23T04:38:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-1-q-and-5-cs-are-distinct-individuals-so-total-11833222026-04-23T04:38:23+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-most-accessible-and-correct-final-answer-derived-from-identities-is-4709392026-04-24T18:41:48+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-cleanest-final-answer-accepted-in-such-contexts-is-77288232026-03-15T18:26:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-a-number-however-the-problem-asks-for-a-ratio-so-this-is-acceptable-79700552026-04-23T04:52:28+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-the-expected-format-and-since-no-simpler-form-exists-and-this-is-widely-accepted-in-geometric-derivations-we-conclude-90925932026-03-15T18:26:57+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-must-consider-the-domain--x-8682892026-03-15T18:38:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-likely-expects-a-specific-vectorperhaps-from-context-however-without-additional-conditions-the-solution-is-not-unique-but-in-olympiad-problems-often-the-form-is-expected-with-free-parameters-or-minimal-norm-given-the-format-we-report-the-components-constrained-55474702026-04-23T05:05:51+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-resolve-suppose-the-vector-is-not-unique-but-the-problem-expects-the-general-form-but-olympiad-problems-usually-have-unique-answers-62133232026-04-23T05:05:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-proceed-with-precise-decimal-arithmetic-and-round-to-nearest-whole-number-35297722026-03-15T18:51:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-function-exceeds-any-bound-the-maximum-value-is-not-finite-37642922026-04-23T05:21:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-that-equation-was-derived-from-a-quadratic-but-the-angle-condition-gave-a-rational-equation-24074462026-04-23T05:27:53+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-neither-satisfies-angle-condition-53445672026-04-23T05:27:53+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-proceed-assume-the-question-is-to-solve-the-quadratic-regardless-40973052026-04-23T05:28:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-contradicts-the-given-total-of-65-meters-so-we-re-evaluate-the-problem-states-the-total-retreat-is-65-meters-so-we-must-use-the-sum-formula-correctly-32711712026-04-23T05:29:18+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-within-the-block-a-and-a-are-indistinct-so-no-extra-factor-91667482026-03-15T19:04:42+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-simplify-divide-numerator-and-denominator-by-check-gcd-82326892026-04-24T18:52:00+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-messy-alternatively-accept-symmetry-since-the-three-dice-are-symmetric-and-the-sum-mod-3-is-uniformly-distributed-under-uniform-independent-choices-not-quite-because-residue-counts-are-not-equal-98946022026-04-24T18:52:00+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-elegant-recompute-numerator-96540532026-04-24T18:51:44+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-simplify-by-dividing-numerator-and-denominator-by-no-common-factors-so-24291572026-04-23T05:31:23+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-standard-lets-instead-recompute-with-correct-counting-4087402026-04-24T18:52:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-an-integer--contradiction-73723072026-04-23T05:36:12+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-using-exact-sum-without-early-rounding-18982672026-04-23T05:37:52+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-sample-counts-are-discrete-and-question-asks-for-total-keep-precise-91663252026-04-23T05:37:52+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-reevaluate-reduces-by-5-percentage-points--already-at-34-so-cannot-go-below-0-9543572026-04-23T05:37:52+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-asks-for-number-of-users-so-likely-453-12565142026-04-23T05:37:51+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-be-precise-use-exact-computation-as-per-math-sequence-73682542026-04-23T05:37:51+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-user-asked-for-fourth-power-alternatively-use-a-modulus-where-solutions-exist-16340222026-04-24T18:54:12+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-the-original-intention-and-maintain-difficulty-here-is-a-valid-solvable-version-14755842026-04-24T18:54:12+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-stay-on-the-original-path-and-fix-a-feasible-problem-73893312026-04-24T18:54:12+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-align-with-geology-and-vision-themes-and-maintain-difficulty-20168622026-04-24T18:54:12+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-only-480-acres-exist-so-coverage-is-limited-to-480-8467942026-04-23T05:51:46+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-per-instruction-to-align-with-format-and-focus-on-calculation-the-chromosome-count-in-a-tetraploid-is-56-62652962026-04-23T05:51:44+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-that-cant-be--perhaps-error-in-model-3548712026-04-23T05:54:39+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-implies-it-does--so-perhaps-the-regeneration-is-not-multiplicative-in-that-way-or-the-12-heals-a-proportion-of-the-damaged-area-not-12-of-total-84561632026-04-23T05:54:39+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-operational-time-is-15-times-longer-so-daily-coverage-becomes-12367592026-03-15T19:42:48+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-instruction-is-to-generate-instead-use-valid-math-97852792026-03-15T19:42:54+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-follow-format-revise-question-54650892026-04-24T19:00:42+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-says-at-what-time-so-both-6751272026-03-15T19:42:55+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-assignment-must-preserve-the-maximal-total-which-is-forced-by-using-the-7-largest-weights-and-the-condition-specifies-only-that-the-highest-feature-has-the-largest-weight-we-must-count-the-number-of-permutations-of-7-weights-chosen-from-10-where-the-largest-of-the-selected-7-is-assigned-to-position-7-the-highest-indexed-feature-62586102026-04-23T06:06:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-attracting-from--c1--09--instead-solve--fx--x--properly-96558812026-04-23T06:08:37+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-is-sum-is-420-then-n20-54275222026-04-23T06:10:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-resolve-lets-assume-a-typo-and-its-420-71922412026-04-23T06:11:00+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-be-accurate-lets-use-a-different-problem-33624412026-04-23T06:11:01+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-keep-the-original-persona-lets-use-a-correct-one-54108442026-04-23T06:11:01+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-stay-close-use-the-phenomenologist-one-32966142026-04-23T06:11:00+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-for-n-the-number-of-terms-41565952026-04-23T06:11:02+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-sum-equals-240-and-n-is-count-4964372026-04-23T06:11:01+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-are-told--hx1---hx--is-linear--which-is-always-true-for-quadratic-polynomials-so-that-doesnt-help-distinguish-however-note-if--hx1---hx--is-linear-and--h--is-quadratic-this-is-consistent-but-we-have-two-equations-and-three-unknowns-but-we-can-use-the-structure-34749922026-04-23T06:19:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-only-have--h2024--2024---h2025--2025--compute--h2026--h2025--d2025--2025--2a2025--a--b--96993032026-04-23T06:19:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-notice-that-among-any-four-consecutive-odd-numbers-at-least-one-is-divisible-by--3--and-at-least-one-is-divisible-by--5--in-most-cases-but-not-always-46740402026-04-23T06:21:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-zones-are-fixed-a-and-b-specified-so-binomial-coefficient-counts-selection-31453992026-04-23T06:34:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-we-are-computing-a-probability-over-uniformly-random-orderings-of-the-5-transitions-with-fixed-distinct-timing-positions-we-can-instead-consider-the-5-possible-orderings-of-the-transitions-with-each-ordering-equally-likely-under-the-uniform-model-35745502026-04-23T06:34:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait-in-circular-arrangements-fixing-one-non-birch-to-break-rotational-symmetry-and-arranging-the-rest-relative-to-it-is-equivalent-to-the-above-method-since-the-grains-are-otherwise-indistinct-by-type-and-we-are-counting-distinct-circular-configurations-up-to-rotation-the-above-count-is-valid-70023672026-04-24T19:06:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-expects-integer--likely-typo-but-assume-exact-28347492026-04-23T06:39:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-number-of-terms-must-be-integer-and-sum-not-integer-at-integer-n-likely-problem-error-31333072026-04-24T19:08:06+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-find--n--implying-integer-65438912026-04-24T19:08:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-comply-here-is-a-corrected-version-with-solvable-integer-67978162026-04-24T19:08:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-stay-true-lets-use-a-different-initial-sum-9554262026-04-24T19:08:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-in-context-report-the-floor-or-ceiling-not-specified-42366262026-04-24T19:08:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-the-persona-use-the-original-with-corrected-sum-44414062026-04-24T19:08:08+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-fulfill-here-is-a-corrected-solvable-question-16279482026-04-23T06:39:52+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-more-importantly-consider-cases-based-on-the-sign-of-each-expression-44418162026-03-15T20:32:28+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-accept-approximate-no--likely-typo-in-problem-or-in-expectation-67962132026-03-15T20:34:18+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-is-unsolvable-as-is-13502112026-03-15T20:34:19+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-question-allows-approximate-unlikely-33692052026-04-24T19:11:59+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-is-is-124-but-given-120-32583262026-04-24T19:11:59+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-instruction-is-to-generate-a-question-not-solve-one-with-existing-numbers-10553062026-03-15T20:34:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-users-instruction-is-to-generate-a-new-question-so-i-can-ensure-it-has-a-clean-answer-50185482026-03-15T20:34:29+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-thats-not-based-on-arithmetic-sequence-24840172026-03-15T20:34:29+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-must-subtract-the-cases-where-one-or-more-ai--100-use-inclusion-exclusion-356362026-04-23T06:55:46+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-contradicts-the-spirit-of-the-indistinguishable-clause-40497522026-04-23T06:57:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-seems-inconsistent-with-the-indistinguishable-clause-8277652026-04-23T06:57:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-honor-the-problems-intent-perhaps-only-identical-types-are-indistinct--but-since-values-are-different-they-are-not-93418122026-04-23T06:57:24+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-contradicts-the-indistinguishable-clause-18330992026-04-23T06:57:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-list-shows-m-v--different-so-likely-distinct-27917002026-04-23T06:57:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-align-with-the-spirit-of-the-problem--perhaps-the-datasets-are-collected-but-within-type-order-doesnt-matter-but-the-problem-says-analyzes-one-sample-per-day-and-sequences-matter-73892602026-04-23T06:57:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-honor-the-indistinguishable-clause-suppose-that-within-motion-related-only-the-two-observations-m-and-v-are-indistinct--but-that-contradicts-the-labeling-72835252026-04-23T06:57:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-lists-m-v-as-two-downtimes--so-likely-distinct-42496292026-04-23T06:57:24+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-what-the-instruction-says-59246412026-04-23T06:57:25+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-that-doesnt-match-expected-difficulty-53732952026-04-23T06:57:24+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-previous-logic-says-max-comparisons-was-105--maybe-conflating-24746322026-04-24T19:12:18+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-recurrence-max-comparisons-was-105--maybe-link-back-56223692026-04-24T19:12:19+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-no--it-says-they-record-a-measurement--one-per-pair-62338312026-04-24T19:12:19+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-restart-with-a-better-version-55356602026-04-23T06:57:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-not-involving-sql-or-plant-biology-55805172026-04-23T06:57:25+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-maximum-possible--if-all-300-are-unique-then-300-20516542026-04-23T06:57:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-student-might-expect-62000-no--because-of-row-limit-39812132026-04-23T06:57:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-with-only-pairwise-limits-minimum-is-when-overlaps-are-maximized-50452502026-04-23T06:57:25+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-for-combined-power-usage-instantaneous-not-energy-40049132026-04-23T07:13:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-write-as-constants-satisfying-the-condition-rationalize-10631392026-04-23T07:15:18+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-says-after-how-many-hours-implying-a-future-time-but-numerically-a-is-already-greater-3276982026-04-23T07:16:34+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-logically-since-a-starts-at-500--300-and-grows-faster-a-is-always-greater-91432812026-04-23T07:16:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-says-after-how-many-hours--implying-a-specific-number-98686432026-04-24T19:17:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-logically-the-first-time-a-exceeds-b-is-immediately-but-not-after-87380262026-04-24T19:17:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-make-it-work-perhaps-the-values-are-reversed-13605892026-04-23T07:16:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-question-asks-for-after-how-many-hours-and-its-already-exceeded-at-t0-but-after-implies-t--0-18002502026-04-23T07:16:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-proceed-with-a-valid-question-lets-assume-the-values-are-correct-and-the-intent-is-to-find-when-a-first-surpasses-b-after-t0-but-since-it-already-has-but-for-the-sake-of-a-meaningful-problem-suppose-type-b-starts-with-more-62960042026-04-24T19:17:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-maybe-after-how-many-hours-means-the-first-time-it-exceeds-and-since-at-t0-its-already-500--300-and-no-equilibrium-a-is-always-ahead-455292026-04-23T07:16:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-create-a-solvable-problem-lets-reframe-with-corrected-logic-142792026-04-23T07:16:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-stay-close-lets-keep-the-growth-idea-but-adjust-initial-values-73551292026-04-23T07:16:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-implies-such-a-group-exists--reconsider-perhaps-the-teacher-adjusted-and-the-largest-valid-prime-that-can-divide-360-is-not-applicable-18130472026-04-24T19:18:59+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-suppose-the-teacher-uses-355-students-no--stated-360-70137512026-04-23T07:24:54+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-resolve-perhaps-the-teacher-meant-prime-divisor--but-primes-dividing-360-are-235--none-5-56403602026-04-23T07:24:57+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-suppose-the-question-means-what-is-the-largest-prime-number-such-that-it-divides-360-and-is-greater-than-5-3993872026-04-23T07:24:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-provide-a-numerical-answer-and-considering-common-olympiad-trick-maybe-the-intended-number-is-363-or-352-85347802026-04-23T07:24:59+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-align-with-format-assume-the-question-meant-what-is-the-largest-prime-factor-of-360--answer-is-5--but-not-5-58682292026-04-23T07:25:02+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-persona-and-context-are-fixed-83506482026-04-23T07:25:02+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--360-is-not-prime-but-lets-compute-all-possible-group-sizes-that-are-prime-and-5--but-none-divide-360--so-answer-is-0-66226102026-04-23T07:25:41+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-increases-which-is-illogical-83094202026-04-24T19:20:59+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-that-would-allow-merging-into-fewer-effective-groupings-however-this-leads-to-equivalence-under-symmetry-18346282026-04-23T07:34:39+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-waiteach-path-is-assigned-to-a-layer-and-layers-are-fixed-categories-but-not-labeled-so-if-we-swap-the-labels-of-two-layers-is-it-a-different-assignment-nothe-problem-says-indistinguishable-beyond-type-so-we-treat-them-as-unordered-66299522026-04-23T07:34:38+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-3-unique-geological-layers-but-indistinguishable-beyond-typethis-suggests-that-although-they-are-unique-in-nature-for-grouping-only-the-count-per-type-matters-and-since-they-are-indistinct-we-identify-assignments-that-are-permutations-of-each-other-47742842026-04-23T07:34:39+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-layers-are-unlabeled-the-partition-is-determined-by-the-multiset-of-sizes-including-zeros-and-non-decreasing-order-89305032026-04-23T07:34:39+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-says-sum-is-210--must-have-solution-37596602026-04-24T19:22:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-problem-meant-geometric-no-arithmetic-91784382026-04-24T19:22:23+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-seems-inconsistent-with-the-intended-interpretation-99691952026-04-23T07:37:16+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-states-a-mapping-results-in--x--degrees--a-specific-value--not-reduced-so-perhaps-the-mapping-is-linear-9688272026-04-23T07:37:16+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-contradicts-offset-unless-defined-that-way-20753602026-04-23T07:37:18+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-mapping-is-direct-the-physical-angle--x--satisfies-96969872026-04-23T07:37:16+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-need-to-express-in-terms-of--z--and--c--only-91274012026-04-23T07:37:16+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-you-cant-have-06-of-a-farmer-but-the-question-is-based-on-averages-so-we-take-the-exact-value-as-per-calculation-but-in-the-format-previous-examples-use-whole-numbers-so-perhaps-adjust-but-no--the-math-is-correct-as-756-but-final-answer-must-be-integer-alternatively-the-problem-expects-76-but-we-follow-math-68763412026-04-23T07:49:55+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--perhaps-the-anthropologist-found-that-108-farmers-grow-maize-and-70-of-them--so-756--but-in-real-world-its-76-but-for-the-purpose-of-this-math-problem-we-output-the-exact-computed-value-as-756-but-thats-not-acceptable-81543092026-04-23T07:49:55+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-looking-at-the-initial-examples-all-answers-are-integers-so-likely-this-question-should-yield-integer-64598832026-04-23T07:50:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-fix-perhaps-change-the-percentages-but-we-follow-the-instruction-53750042026-04-24T19:25:18+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-final-answer-is-likely-expected-to-be-one-number-no--the-question-has-two-questions-but-in-the-format-the-final-answer-is-boxed-singular-22775382026-04-23T07:50:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-instruction-says-generate-5-questions-each-with-one-final-answer-14155062026-04-23T07:50:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-resolve-assume-the-problem-allows-the-exact-arithmetic-result-and-since-its-a-math-problem-report-756-but-that-breaks-format-64767372026-04-24T19:25:17+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-final-answer-must-be-a-whole-number-and-per-format-and-none-of-the-initial-examples-have-decimal-final-answers-this-is-problematic-55817752026-04-23T07:50:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-instruction-is-to-generate-based-on-the-personas-not-to-perfect-25380932026-04-24T19:25:17+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-this-is-a-hypothetical-and-to-match-format-we-output-the-exact-calculation-as-per-math-and-since-previous-adelphi-problems-have-integer-answers-we-revise-the-numbers-slightly-in-the-solution-to-ensure-integer-27162612026-04-24T19:25:17+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-instruction-is-to-generate-so-i-can-adjust-20547402026-04-24T19:25:17+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-follow-lets-assume-the-question-is-correct-and-the-answer-is-756-but-thats-not-correct-for-the-context-76682492026-04-24T19:25:17+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-looking-at-the-initial-problems-all-final-answers-are-integers-89350382026-04-24T19:25:17+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--perhaps-the-problem-allows-for-a-correction-lets-double-check-the-cross-product-16371522026-04-23T07:55:46+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-seems-odd-for-a-problem-perhaps-the-dot-product-condition-is-misread-48644402026-04-23T07:55:46+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-aim-to-identify-the-surface-start-by-squaring-both-sides-72349492026-04-24T19:27:23+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-substitution-may-be-messy-instead-express-everything-in-terms-of-multiple-angles-40984942026-04-24T19:27:23+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-standard-math-competition-solution-compute-numerically-47641022026-04-23T08:04:06+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-trivial-change-numbers-71437712026-04-23T08:10:51+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-likely-expects-exact-computation-93466632026-04-23T08:15:24+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-for-the-maximum-number-or-the-percentage-wait--what-is-the-annual-percentage-decline--so-a-percentage-62338142026-04-23T08:15:24+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-reconsider-perhaps-the-sum-is-not-2024-in-base-10-unlikely-70753462026-04-24T19:33:40+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-suppose-the-problem-meant-a--b--2016-but-it-says-2024-5197712026-04-24T19:33:41+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-suppose-exact-solution-use-precise-value-76096252026-04-23T08:28:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-implies-integer-solution-16359382026-04-23T08:28:29+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-per-instruction-generate-correct-problem-68632932026-04-23T08:28:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-meet-instruction-use-a-correct-solvable-problem-36497152026-04-23T08:28:28+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-stay-on-track-here-is-a-corrected-solvable-version-26834682026-04-23T08:28:28+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-original-asks-for-210-and-no-integer-solution-we-must-pick-a-value-that-works-6717092026-04-23T08:28:28+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-marbles-are-indistinguishable-and-urns-are-distinguishable-we-model-this-by-counting-integer-solutions-to-27545382026-03-15T22:13:46+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-instruction-is-to-generate-questions-so-perhaps-use-a-different-approach-58806082026-04-23T08:31:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-adhere-lets-create-a-version-that-works-994572026-04-23T08:31:49+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-upon-reevaluation-perhaps-the-intended-solution-is-56339562026-04-23T08:31:51+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-difficulty-lets-keep-the-original-structure-and-fix-the-numbers-73923072026-04-23T08:31:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-instruction-is-to-generate-based-on-persona-so-ill-create-a-valid-one-80500582026-04-23T08:31:51+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-initial-question-was-correct-in-form-but-the-solution-hit-a-snag-60386302026-04-23T08:31:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-user-asked-for-10-questions-and-one-of-them-must-be-like-that-53354022026-04-23T08:31:51+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-users-instruction-is-to-generate-so-ill-proceed-with-a-corrected-version-that-works-93219322026-04-23T08:31:51+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-save-time-here-is-a-valid-challenging-version-9695752026-04-23T08:31:51+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-user-asked-for-a-question-with-layla-and-tls-encryption-in-the-persona-but-tls-is-network-security-so-lets-integrate-25826492026-04-24T19:36:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-need-a-uniform-lower-bound-try-using-67048912026-04-24T19:43:12+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-degree-of-the-numerator-is-one-more-than-the-denominator-the-limit-does-not-approach-a-finite-number--it-grows-without-bound-however-for-rational-functions-with-higher-degree-in-numerator-the-limit-at-infinity-is-determined-by-leading-coefficients-26856572026-04-24T19:43:19+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-in-the-context-the-closest-integer-is-11-but-sum-is-220-40857692026-04-23T08:59:48+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-resolve-lets-use-a-corrected-version-34074442026-04-23T08:59:48+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-instruction-is-to-generate-so-lets-replace-with-a-valid-one-36212222026-04-23T08:59:48+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-terms-must-be-integer-so-likely-the-sum-is-meant-to-be-achieved-65386622026-04-23T08:59:57+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-says-is-1200-so-perhaps-accept-the-equation-and-find-positive-root-12718452026-04-23T09:00:01+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-number-of-terms-must-be-integer-4051482026-04-23T08:59:57+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-intends-the-equation-and-expects-the-exact-value-but-number-of-terms-must-be-integer-89883452026-04-23T09:00:04+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-no-integer-n-gives-exactly-1200-50055272026-04-23T09:00:16+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-has-a-typo-or-we-accept-the-floor-91660582026-04-23T09:00:18+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-1200-is-not-achievable-likely-error-2439702026-04-23T09:00:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-instruction-is-to-generate-based-on-persona-so-i-can-adjust-12870402026-04-23T09:00:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-is-1200-so-perhaps-make-it-1150-31119712026-04-23T09:00:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-proceed-lets-use-a-different-sum-64975552026-04-23T09:00:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-fix-lets-use-a-new-sequence-29774312026-04-23T09:00:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-persona-includes-finance-so-okay-8588332026-04-23T09:00:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-lets-create-a-new-one-58414152026-04-23T09:00:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-a-cumulative-effect-across-area--however-expected-rise-is-proportional-14011262026-04-24T19:44:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-allows-non-integer-use-35243672026-04-24T19:44:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-be-precise-use-fraction-but-examples-use-integers-47278252026-04-24T19:44:37+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-must-have-clean-answer-change-76310072026-04-24T19:44:37+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-for-minutes--may-accept-decimal-99891132026-04-24T19:44:37+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-use-exact-computation-87334482026-04-24T19:44:37+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-comply-adjust-the-capture-time-no-5982102026-04-24T19:44:41+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-prior-solutions-use-exact-expressions-25320522026-04-24T19:44:42+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-question-means-round-to-nearest-minute-but-not-specified-99053722026-04-24T19:44:42+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-and-since-other-answers-are-exact-use-52927792026-04-24T19:44:48+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-see-in-the-first-solution-4-is-exact-84732642026-04-23T09:04:50+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-use-the-exact-value-as-per-math-83432082026-04-23T09:04:48+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-be-precise-and-consistent-with-format-use-53461252026-04-23T09:04:48+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-system-expects-a-clean-answer-34124002026-04-23T09:04:46+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-no--we-proceed-with-the-intended-95238132026-04-23T09:04:49+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-quadratic--yet-it-satisfies-the-values-86308012026-04-24T19:46:53+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--are-there-other-cubic-polynomials-passing-through-these-points-no--a-cubic-is-determined-uniquely-by-four-points-so-even-if-its-technically-quadratic-the-cubic-coefficient-happens-to-be-zero-so-f5--26-1939772026-04-23T09:11:48+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-suppose-the-problem-has-a-typo-and-we-proceed-with-consistent-values-44405262026-04-24T19:47:55+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait-are-the-vowels-always-distinct-and-clearly-identifiable-yes--a-i-o-are-all-distinct-and-appear-once-50769312026-04-23T09:21:49+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-contradicts-intuition--the-asian-biologist-has-a-1-hour-shift-from-830-to-930-while-european-has-only-1-hour-from-800-to-900-actually-the-overlap-in-time-windows-favors-earlier-arrival-but-lets-recompute-with-better-geometry-the-total-sample-space-is-a-rectangle-of-width-1-european-time-and-height-1-asian-time-so-area-1-the-region-x--y-85736002026-04-24T19:49:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-want-the-ratio-of-the-area-of-the-incircle-to-the-area-of-the-triangle-73682132026-04-23T09:29:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-can-express-this-ratio-more-elegantly-using-known-identities-alternatively-recall-54217392026-04-23T09:29:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-is-not-simplified-however-from-the-example-63628142026-04-23T09:29:58+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-can-write-it-in-terms-of-r-and-d-only-not-uniquely-57133262026-04-23T09:29:59+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-condition-cannot-be-satisfied-that-suggests-an-error-in-assumption-78766162026-04-24T19:55:10+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-must-check-for-extraneous-solutions-introduced-by-squaring-2138342026-04-23T09:47:40+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-may-expect-us-to-conclude-no-solution-92923842026-04-23T09:47:37+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-likely-expects-a-solution-perhaps-i-made-a-mistake-in-setup-48512352026-04-23T09:47:41+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-avoid-assumption-reframe-the-question-to-eliminate-unknown-instead-use-proportional-reasoning-no-better-to-rework-logic-actually-original-version-is-flawed-instead-regenerate-with-fixed-distance-but-instruction-says-to-generate-not-fix-so-here-is-corrected-versions-20207702026-04-24T19:56:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-per-original-instruction-generate-only-5-so-replace-with-better-crafted-one-with-full-context-25285622026-04-24T19:56:32+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-only-even-prime-is-2-all-other-primes-are-odd-61715672026-03-15T23:35:28+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--from-2u--2--3u---3-subtract-2u-15305082026-04-23T09:52:00+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-recurrence-is-exact-and-were-to-report-the-value-we-compute-numerically-74593542026-04-23T09:52:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-cannot-exceed-the-sum-300-because-of-the-order-72118952026-04-23T09:54:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-that-would-be-increasing-not-reducing--intentional-59546562026-04-23T09:54:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-tripling-is-prior-to-intervention-70201642026-04-23T09:54:28+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-only-one-day-assume-the-growth-factor-for-the-next-two-days-is-such-that-at-the-end-of-day-6-it-doubles-from-day-4-77287992026-03-15T23:39:45+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-from-day-4-so-likely-the-doubling-rule-is-active-from-day-4-onward-for-new-intervals-69123462026-04-24T19:57:28+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-output-is-a-number-and-question-says-how-many-weeks-likely-expects-decimal-54216492026-04-23T09:54:36+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-question-asks-both-but-final-answer-likely-total-58087612026-04-23T09:54:36+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-overlap-is-negligible-not-that-there-is-no-overlap-but-we-assume-no-wasted-coverage-the-minimal-number-such-that-total-area-covered-is-at-least-10000-95408752026-04-23T10:01:12+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-is-from-a-source-that-expects-integer-answer-21529572026-04-23T10:01:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-vertex-is-at-25-and-since-concave-up-minimum-realized-at-nearest-integers-give-lower-value-59122452026-04-23T10:03:48+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-says-pure-sand--so-adding-sand-increases-sand-percentage-61028702026-04-23T10:10:35+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-salvage-lets-assume-the-target-is-55-sand--common-in-soil-amendments-38789402026-04-23T10:10:39+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-may-expect-the-exact-expression-or-rounded-since-education-context-likely-decimal-80549252026-04-24T20:04:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-sample-answers-are-integers-or-simple-decimals-here-its-not-integer-but-acceptable-10064972026-03-16T00:04:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-lets-see-the-initial-samples-they-are-exact-here-we-write-74632162026-04-24T20:04:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-compute-precisely-5156682026-04-23T10:33:56+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-context-implies-nontrivial-however-problem-doesnt-specify-624542026-04-24T20:09:38+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-seems-too-trivial-perhaps-the-problem-intends-for-a-nontrivial-automorphic-number-9656382026-04-24T20:09:38+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-confirm-are-there-smaller-positive-integers-no-45744612026-04-24T20:09:38+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-the-spirit-perhaps-the-intended-answer-is-376-but-mathematically-1-is-correct-65423272026-04-24T20:09:39+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-conflicts-with-expectations-67682552026-04-24T20:09:39+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-both-sign-combinations-work-but-sequence-is-ordered-both-are-mathematically-valid-however-to-match-standard-progression-and-positivity-we-take-the-increasing-case-19554622026-04-23T10:46:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-for-values--likely-expects-expression-12075222026-04-23T10:46:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-both-satisfy-and-no-restriction-but-convention-is-to-list-one-61088782026-04-23T10:46:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-problem-does-not-specify-increasing-both-valid-but-to-pick-one-assume-increasing-20550402026-04-23T10:46:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-likely-expects-the-expression-83872002026-04-23T10:46:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-likely-expects-the-expressions-97951912026-04-23T10:46:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-per-instruction-final-answer-in-box-56021652026-04-23T10:46:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-typically-in-such-problems-they-expect-the-increasing-sequence-915842026-04-23T10:46:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-be-exact-we-note-both-are-solutions-30640572026-04-23T10:46:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-when-solved-the-other-is-analogous-55186532026-04-23T10:46:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-be-accurate-the-solution-is-two-pairs-1780412026-04-23T10:46:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-efficiency-cannot-exceed-100-the-final-efficiency-is-limited-to-100-29919812026-04-23T10:46:59+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-states-sum-is-210-so-must-be-consistent-39004422026-04-24T20:14:20+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-model-assumes-positive-domain-and-we-seek-the-vertex-to-find-peak-efficiency-but-question-says-minimizes-90771872026-04-23T11:06:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-strictly-for-minimization-unless-domain-limits-35350652026-04-23T11:06:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-standard-interpretation-in-such-models-is-to-find-the-vertex-for-peak-efficiency-71057062026-04-23T11:06:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-fix-lets-re-express-the-solution-with-correct-logic-43804832026-04-23T11:06:05+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-only-physical-velocities-still-without-bounds-no-minimum-30541172026-04-23T11:06:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-suggests-an-error-in-model-interpretation-32298042026-04-23T11:06:06+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-mathematically-unless-constrained-min-does-not-exist-13354342026-04-23T11:06:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-resolve-lets-assume-the-model-is-correct-and-they-mean-the-velocity-at-which-fuel-consumption-is-minimized--but-since-its-a-downward-parabola-it-has-no-global-minimum-unless-bounded-3870492026-04-23T11:06:07+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-wait--this-gives-3-but-if-we-consider-the-magnitude-orthogonal-vectors-in-3d-space-can-sum-to-a-larger-magnitude-however-since-we-are-in-a-plane-three-unit-vectors-can-only-be-mutually-orthogonal-if-two-are-perpendicular-and-the-third-must-lie-in-the-plane--but-orthogonality-in-2d-allows-at-most-two-pairwise-perpendicular-vectors-81290952026-04-23T11:06:29+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-usage-is-irrelevant-if-fully-charged-53476732026-04-23T11:07:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-is-to-solve-for--b--in-terms-of--a--but-equation-is-given-as-equality-43568032026-04-23T11:10:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-its-a-different-interpretation-29271002026-04-23T11:10:34+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-is-to-find--b--in-terms-of--a--but-it-says-the-value-70139102026-04-23T11:10:34+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-doesnt-specify-for-all--a--so-for-a-fixed--a---b--can-be-any-number-39240452026-04-24T20:17:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-states-sum-is-420-solve-exactly-26683612026-04-23T11:11:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-implies-a-solution-exists-recheck-perhaps-typo-94692422026-04-23T11:11:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-allows-non-integer-no-70780742026-04-23T11:11:39+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-problem-meant-quarters-are-40-more-try-37127182026-04-23T11:14:23+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-each-flower-can-only-be-pollinated-once-and-visits-may-exceed-we-compute-unique-flower-coverage-703872026-04-23T11:14:23+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-with-1638-visits-and-1200-flowers-average-overlap-but-best-to-compute-expected-unique-not-required-4011792026-04-24T20:18:04+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-without-overlap-structure-impossible-to-compute-46211902026-04-24T20:18:04+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-you-cant-pollinate-a-fraction-of-a-flower-and-the-question-likely-expects-a-whole-number-and-11466-is-very-close-to-1147-we-report-69052782026-04-24T20:18:04+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-be-precise-the-expected-number-is-11466-but-final-boxed-should-be-integer-per-style-77519702026-04-24T20:18:04+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-exceeds-total-capacity-1000-tons-wait--864--1000-so-its-acceptable-44239772026-04-23T11:17:01+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-mean-is-not-fixed-or-misread-9491292026-04-24T20:20:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-must-ensure-no-character-repeats-so-we-proceed-carefully-28391532026-03-16T01:13:34+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-mathematically-the-smallest-integer-x-such-that-the-mean--60-and-variation-allows-closure-6938752026-03-16T01:19:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-logically-we-only-need-enough-so-that-in-expectation-effect-is-detectable-17011482026-04-24T20:22:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-mathematically-the-minimum-x-such-that-the-lower-end-of-treatment-group-exceeds-40-and-the-mean-is-63-68696852026-04-24T20:22:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-outcome-depends-on-actual-values-69761132026-04-24T20:22:01+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-observed-is-significant-so-at-least-one-must-have-35564482026-04-24T20:22:03+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-question-asks-for-time-to-test-all--so-total-time-is-2500-minutes--4167-hours-44833812026-04-24T20:23:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-format-output-the-time-in-minutes-as-computed-48626752026-04-24T20:23:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-usage-exceeds-budget-no-additional-anchors-can-be-added-81770722026-04-23T11:35:37+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-problem-doesnt-specify-smallest-however-in-olympiad-style-often-the-answer-is-unique--so-perhaps-theres-a-misinterpretation-17667172026-04-24T20:24:29+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-olympiad-precision-perhaps-re-express-44647662026-03-16T01:28:44+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-orientations-the-ellipse-is-symmetric-11797592026-03-16T01:28:44+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-number-of-terms-must-be-integer-contradiction-97839702026-04-24T20:26:22+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-instruction-is-to-generate-a-question-not-solve-an-invalid-one-95100012026-04-24T20:26:22+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-we-must-output-as-per-instruction-68704022026-04-24T20:26:22+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-waitwhat-if-the-sum-is-390-but-problem-says-210-22176842026-04-24T20:26:22+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-stay-true-lets-assume-a-different-setup-8981132026-04-24T20:26:22+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-instruction-is-to-generate-a-new-question-not-fix-i-meant-to-generate-5-new-ones-the-sixth-is-a-correction-92852012026-04-24T20:26:22+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-task-said-generate-5-clickbait-seo-friendly-and-output-only-those-35261222026-04-24T20:26:22+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-the-instruction-is-to-output-only-the-questions-and-solutions-in-format-with-fifth-clickbait-corrected-86956392026-04-24T20:26:22+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-says-15-days--implies-inconsistency-85427572026-04-23T11:58:01+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-strictly-if-20--50--70-then-30--135-days-65016472026-04-23T11:58:01+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-says-15-days--contradiction-5010812026-04-23T11:58:01+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-says-15-days--impossible-48470392026-04-23T11:58:01+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-explicitly-says-15-days--so-perhaps-50-is-not-of-total-but-of-remaining-after-research-97142562026-04-23T11:58:01+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-this-contradicts-50-build--50-of-45--225-not-30-99482682026-04-23T11:58:01+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-then-remaining--45---9---225--135-days-44642042026-04-23T11:58:02+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-says-the-rest-15-days--so-discrepancy-of-25-days-51091982026-04-23T11:58:02+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-50-for-build-means-50-of-the-non-research-time-65415862026-04-23T11:58:02+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-says-50--clearly-error-25660632026-04-23T11:58:02+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-says-the-rest-15-days--so-unless-rest-is-not-30-its-wrong-99278632026-04-23T11:58:01+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-says-rest-is-15--so-perhaps-20--50--15--85--missing-15-47624342026-04-23T11:58:02+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-problem-says-15-days-and-205070-then-30--135--not-15-46705922026-04-23T11:58:01+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-answer-use-the-explicitly-stated-84057542026-04-23T11:58:02+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-rest-is-45---9---225--135--contradict-15-5528112026-04-23T11:58:01+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-problem-says-15-days-likely-typo-in-50--should-be-333--but-not-27703682026-04-23T11:58:02+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-the-problem-explicitly-states-the-rest-is-15-days-we-must-conclude-its-a-different-allocation-40648902026-04-23T11:58:01+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-the-50-is-a-mistake-and-should-be-50-of-the-remaining--but-no-27853672026-04-23T11:58:02+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-15-days-is-corrupted--but-must-use-53495902026-04-23T11:58:02+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-says-15-so-perhaps-its-135--but-written-as-15-32373432026-04-23T11:58:02+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-says-15-so-perhaps-its-15-days-for-something-else--no-99011672026-04-23T11:58:02+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-problem-says-15-and-15-is-given-perhaps-the-50-is-not-of-total--but-the-text-says-for-build--ambiguous-3664682026-04-24T20:30:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-likely-intends-exact-values-92706672026-04-24T20:30:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-match-the-format-compute-the-rest-as-91842182026-04-24T20:30:13+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-typo-lets-assume-its-solvable-85822652026-04-24T20:30:31+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-i-made-a-mistake-in-setup-15569122026-04-23T11:59:34+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-to-fix-perhaps-the-intended-answer-is-n10-10598972026-04-23T11:59:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-perhaps-3769-is-not-a-perfect-square-49086252026-04-23T11:59:34+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-153-is-closest-and-9-gives-153-perhaps-intended-153-6006242026-04-23T11:59:33+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-reduction-applies-only-during-12-operational-hours-no--of-the-15-12-are-full-or-12-normal-3-off-peak-26945902026-04-23T12:10:16+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-problem-says-operates-for-15-hours-and-energy-reduced-by-20-during-off-peak-6-pm-to-6-am--so-likely-12-hours-at-full-3-hours-at-reduced-27022902026-04-23T12:10:16+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-since-its-a-math-problem-accept-exact-computation-87637932026-04-23T12:10:17+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-likely-expects-expression-or-simplified-but-output-must-be-number-95482402026-04-23T12:10:16+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/but-original-instruction-generate-solvable-not-requiring-unspecified-data-29670032026-03-16T04:06:30+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/butler-nj-county-87076992026-04-12T08:37:09+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/butler-software-mac-11291712026-04-25T03:07:45+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/butler-for-mac-48382182026-04-24T06:40:27+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/butch-lesbian-meaning-59368672026-04-25T04:16:38+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/butch-lesbian-70866552026-04-25T04:27:39+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/butch-women-70100262026-04-25T04:33:21+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/butchery-roblox-74785422026-04-12T08:37:14+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/butt-knight-72198722026-04-25T08:25:26+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/butcher-the-game-22648182026-04-12T08:37:15+00:00daily0.8https://deploy.ibuildnew.com.au/reviews/butchers-creek-58926472026-04-12T08:37:15+00:00daily0.8