yourarray.shape or np.shape() or np.ma.shape() returns the shape of your ndarray as a tuple; And you can get the (number of) dimensions of your array using yourarray.ndim or np.ndim()..

The shape attribute for numpy arrays returns the dimensions of the array. If Y has n rows and m columns, then Y.shape is (n,m). So Y.shape[0] is n.

Shape n, expresses the shape of a 1D array with n items, and n, 1 the shape of a n-row x 1-column array. (R,) and (R,1) just add (useless) parentheses but still express respectively 1D and 2D array.

Understanding the Context

On the other hand, x.shape is a 2-tuple which represents the shape of x, which in this case is (10, 1024). x.shape[0] gives the first element in that tuple, which is 10. Here's a demo with some.

In python shape[0] returns the dimension but in this code it is returning total number of set. Please can someone tell me work of shape[0] and shape[1]? Code: m_train = train_set_x_orig.shape[0]

python list np.array ()nested list, shape,tuple int _0 nested list.

How can I find the input size of an onnx model? I would eventually like to script it from python. With tensorflow I can recover the graph definition, find input candidate nodes from it and then.

Key Insights

Shape (in the numpy context) seems to me the better option for an argument name. The actual relation between the two is size = np.prod(shape) so the distinction should indeed be a bit.

ValueError: shape mismatch: objects cannot be broadcast to a single shape It computes the first two (I am running several thousand of these tests in a loop) and then dies.

8 list object in python does not have 'shape' attribute because 'shape' implies that all the columns (or rows) have equal length along certain dimension. Let's say list variable a has following.